WANG Yafeng, YU Guodong. Category Construction and Orientation in Parent/Child Interaction[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(3): 267-276. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022110092
Citation: WANG Yafeng, YU Guodong. Category Construction and Orientation in Parent/Child Interaction[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(3): 267-276. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022110092

Category Construction and Orientation in Parent/Child Interaction

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022110092
  • Received Date: 2022-11-22
  • Accepted Date: 2023-03-06
  • Publish Date: 2023-06-25
  • Parent/Child interaction as a type of talk-in-interaction is fundamentally a participant-produced interactive achievement. Taking video recordings and transcripts of parent/kid interactions from four families as its data, and integrating Conversation Analysis (CA) with Membership Categorisation Analysis (MCA), we propose to understand categorisation as constructed by social actions. Data analyses show three relation pairs, namely, guardian/kid, friend/friend, and teacher/pupil, are co-constructed and oriented to by relevant parties with social actions executed at specific sequential positions by parents and children, evoking three different member categorisation devices. This research not only innovates MCA studies, but also showcases the necessity and possibility of integrating CA with MCA. Research findings have deepened our understanding of parent/child interaction and might be applied in social practice.

     

  • [1]
    GOFFMAN E. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-face Behaviour [M]. New York: Doubleday Anchor, 1967.
    [2]
    GARFINKEL H. Studies in Ethnomethodology [M]. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1967.
    [3]
    GOODWIN M H & CEKAITE A. Embodied Family Choreography: Practices of Control [M]. London & New York: Routledge, 2018.
    [4]
    SACKS H. Lectures on Conversation (Vols I and II) [M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.
    [5]
    HOUSLEY W & FITZGERALD R. Introduction to membership categorisation analysis [C] // FITZGERALD R & HOUSLEY W. Advances in Membership Categorisation Analysis. London: Sage, 2015: 1-21.
    [6]
    TAJFEL H & TURNER J C. The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour [C] // WORCHEL S & AUSTIN W G. Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1986: 7-24.
    [7]
    TURNER J, Hogg M, Oakes P, et al. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-categorisation Theory [M]. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell, 1987.
    [8]
    EDWARDS D. Categories are for talking:on the cognitive and discursive bases of categorisation [J]. Theory & Psychology, 1991, 1(4):515-542.
    [9]
    YU G & WU Y. Managing expert/novice identity with actions in conversation:identity construction and negotiation [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2021, 178:273-286. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.03.021
    [10]
    SACKS H. On the analysability of stories by children [C] // GUMPERZ J J & HYMES D. Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. New York: Rinehart and Winston, 1972: 325-345.
    [11]
    SCHüTZ A. The Structures of the Life-world (Vol. 1) [M]. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973.
    [12]
    SACKS H. Hotrodder: a revolutionary category [C] // PSATHAS G. Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers Inc, 1979: 7-14.
    [13]
    SACKS H. On the analysability of stories of children [C] // TURNER J J. Ethnomethodology. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1974: 216-32.
    [14]
    WATSON R. De-reifying categories [C] // FITZGERALD R & HOUSLEY W. Advances in Membership Categorisation Analysis. London: Sage, 2015: 23-49.
    [15]
    DREW P. Conversation analysis and social action [J]. 外国语,2013,36(3):2-19.
    [16]
    SACKS H,SCHEGLOFF E A & JEFFERSON G A. Simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation [J]. Language, 1974, 50(4):696-735. doi: 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    [17]
    HEPBURN A & BOLDEN G. Transcribing for Social Research [M]. London: Sage, 2017.
    [18]
    SACKS H. Lectures on Conversation (Vols I and II) [M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.
    [19]
    TANNEN D. Power maneuvers or connection maneuvers? Ventriloquizing in family interaction [C] // TANNEN D & ALATIS J E. Linguistics, Language, and the Real World: Discourse and Beyond. Washington, D. C. : Georgetown University Press, 2003: 50-62.
    [20]
    TANNEN D. Abduction and identity in family interaction: ventriloquizing as indirectness [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2010, 42(2): 307–316.
    [21]
    SCHEGLOFF E A,JEFFERSON G & SACKS H. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation [J]. Language, 1977, 53(2):361-382. doi: 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
    [22]
    向大军. 现代汉语“让”字的功能视角研究[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2019,35(6):10-17.
    [23]
    WATSON R. Categorization,authorization and blame-negotiation in conversation [J]. Sociology, 1978, 12(1):105-113. doi: 10.1177/003803857801200106
    [24]
    HERITAGE J. Action formulation and its epistemic (and other) backgrounds [J]. Discourse Studies, 2002, 15(10):551-78.
    [25]
    何伟,安德鲁·格特力. 生态语言学的学科属性及其分支生态文体学−安德鲁·格特力教授访谈录[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020,36(1):1-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2689.2020.01.001
  • Relative Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 徐婧. 从“亲权”到“亲责”:家庭教育的司法介入. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2025(02): 97-106 .
    2. 于国栋,李珍. “合理化”作为抱怨第三方回应行为的会话分析研究. 外语教学理论与实践. 2023(04): 1-11+25 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-05020406080
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 18.1 %FULLTEXT: 18.1 %META: 76.5 %META: 76.5 %PDF: 5.3 %PDF: 5.3 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 6.8 %其他: 6.8 %其他: 0.1 %其他: 0.1 %Canyon Country: 0.1 %Canyon Country: 0.1 %China: 0.1 %China: 0.1 %上海: 3.5 %上海: 3.5 %东莞: 0.4 %东莞: 0.4 %丹东: 0.1 %丹东: 0.1 %北京: 2.7 %北京: 2.7 %十堰: 0.7 %十堰: 0.7 %南京: 1.5 %南京: 1.5 %南宁: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南通: 0.3 %南通: 0.3 %合肥: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %吉林: 0.1 %吉林: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.5 %哥伦布: 0.5 %嘉兴: 1.1 %嘉兴: 1.1 %大同: 0.5 %大同: 0.5 %大连: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %天津: 2.8 %天津: 2.8 %太原: 0.4 %太原: 0.4 %威海: 0.3 %威海: 0.3 %宁德: 0.1 %宁德: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %安阳: 0.1 %安阳: 0.1 %宣城: 0.3 %宣城: 0.3 %常州: 0.4 %常州: 0.4 %平顶山: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %广州: 0.4 %广州: 0.4 %张家口: 1.2 %张家口: 1.2 %徐州: 0.1 %徐州: 0.1 %德阳: 0.3 %德阳: 0.3 %扬州: 2.4 %扬州: 2.4 %无锡: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %杭州: 1.2 %杭州: 1.2 %武汉: 0.3 %武汉: 0.3 %沧州: 0.1 %沧州: 0.1 %济南: 0.8 %济南: 0.8 %海东: 0.5 %海东: 0.5 %深圳: 0.5 %深圳: 0.5 %温州: 0.7 %温州: 0.7 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %漯河: 6.7 %漯河: 6.7 %潍坊: 0.3 %潍坊: 0.3 %烟台: 0.7 %烟台: 0.7 %爱丁堡: 0.3 %爱丁堡: 0.3 %珠海: 0.3 %珠海: 0.3 %石家庄: 1.9 %石家庄: 1.9 %芒廷维尤: 18.5 %芒廷维尤: 18.5 %芝加哥: 0.8 %芝加哥: 0.8 %苏州: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %莆田: 0.1 %莆田: 0.1 %莫斯科: 0.1 %莫斯科: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.3 %衡阳: 0.3 %西宁: 27.7 %西宁: 27.7 %许昌: 0.3 %许昌: 0.3 %邯郸: 1.2 %邯郸: 1.2 %郑州: 3.6 %郑州: 3.6 %鄂州: 0.1 %鄂州: 0.1 %金华: 0.3 %金华: 0.3 %长沙: 2.1 %长沙: 2.1 %阜阳: 0.4 %阜阳: 0.4 %青岛: 0.5 %青岛: 0.5 %马鞍山: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.1 %黄山: 0.1 %黄山: 0.1 %黔南: 0.1 %黔南: 0.1 %其他其他Canyon CountryChina上海东莞丹东北京十堰南京南宁南昌南通合肥吉林呼和浩特哥伦布嘉兴大同大连天津太原威海宁德宁波安阳宣城常州平顶山广州张家口徐州德阳扬州无锡昆明晋城杭州武汉沧州济南海东深圳温州湖州漯河潍坊烟台爱丁堡珠海石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州莆田莫斯科衡阳西宁许昌邯郸郑州鄂州金华长沙阜阳青岛马鞍山黄山黔南

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(6)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (572) PDF downloads(40) Cited by(2)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return