WANG Yafeng, YU Guodong. Category Construction and Orientation in Parent/Child Interaction[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(3): 267-276. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022110092
Citation: WANG Yafeng, YU Guodong. Category Construction and Orientation in Parent/Child Interaction[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(3): 267-276. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022110092

Category Construction and Orientation in Parent/Child Interaction

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022110092
  • Received Date: 2022-11-22
  • Accepted Date: 2023-03-06
  • Publish Date: 2023-06-25
  • Parent/Child interaction as a type of talk-in-interaction is fundamentally a participant-produced interactive achievement. Taking video recordings and transcripts of parent/kid interactions from four families as its data, and integrating Conversation Analysis (CA) with Membership Categorisation Analysis (MCA), we propose to understand categorisation as constructed by social actions. Data analyses show three relation pairs, namely, guardian/kid, friend/friend, and teacher/pupil, are co-constructed and oriented to by relevant parties with social actions executed at specific sequential positions by parents and children, evoking three different member categorisation devices. This research not only innovates MCA studies, but also showcases the necessity and possibility of integrating CA with MCA. Research findings have deepened our understanding of parent/child interaction and might be applied in social practice.

     

  • [1]
    GOFFMAN E. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-face Behaviour [M]. New York: Doubleday Anchor, 1967.
    [2]
    GARFINKEL H. Studies in Ethnomethodology [M]. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1967.
    [3]
    GOODWIN M H & CEKAITE A. Embodied Family Choreography: Practices of Control [M]. London & New York: Routledge, 2018.
    [4]
    SACKS H. Lectures on Conversation (Vols I and II) [M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.
    [5]
    HOUSLEY W & FITZGERALD R. Introduction to membership categorisation analysis [C] // FITZGERALD R & HOUSLEY W. Advances in Membership Categorisation Analysis. London: Sage, 2015: 1-21.
    [6]
    TAJFEL H & TURNER J C. The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour [C] // WORCHEL S & AUSTIN W G. Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1986: 7-24.
    [7]
    TURNER J, Hogg M, Oakes P, et al. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-categorisation Theory [M]. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell, 1987.
    [8]
    EDWARDS D. Categories are for talking:on the cognitive and discursive bases of categorisation [J]. Theory & Psychology, 1991, 1(4):515-542.
    [9]
    YU G & WU Y. Managing expert/novice identity with actions in conversation:identity construction and negotiation [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2021, 178:273-286. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.03.021
    [10]
    SACKS H. On the analysability of stories by children [C] // GUMPERZ J J & HYMES D. Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. New York: Rinehart and Winston, 1972: 325-345.
    [11]
    SCHüTZ A. The Structures of the Life-world (Vol. 1) [M]. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973.
    [12]
    SACKS H. Hotrodder: a revolutionary category [C] // PSATHAS G. Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers Inc, 1979: 7-14.
    [13]
    SACKS H. On the analysability of stories of children [C] // TURNER J J. Ethnomethodology. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1974: 216-32.
    [14]
    WATSON R. De-reifying categories [C] // FITZGERALD R & HOUSLEY W. Advances in Membership Categorisation Analysis. London: Sage, 2015: 23-49.
    [15]
    DREW P. Conversation analysis and social action [J]. 外国语,2013,36(3):2-19.
    [16]
    SACKS H,SCHEGLOFF E A & JEFFERSON G A. Simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation [J]. Language, 1974, 50(4):696-735. doi: 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    [17]
    HEPBURN A & BOLDEN G. Transcribing for Social Research [M]. London: Sage, 2017.
    [18]
    SACKS H. Lectures on Conversation (Vols I and II) [M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.
    [19]
    TANNEN D. Power maneuvers or connection maneuvers? Ventriloquizing in family interaction [C] // TANNEN D & ALATIS J E. Linguistics, Language, and the Real World: Discourse and Beyond. Washington, D. C. : Georgetown University Press, 2003: 50-62.
    [20]
    TANNEN D. Abduction and identity in family interaction: ventriloquizing as indirectness [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2010, 42(2): 307–316.
    [21]
    SCHEGLOFF E A,JEFFERSON G & SACKS H. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation [J]. Language, 1977, 53(2):361-382. doi: 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
    [22]
    向大军. 现代汉语“让”字的功能视角研究[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2019,35(6):10-17.
    [23]
    WATSON R. Categorization,authorization and blame-negotiation in conversation [J]. Sociology, 1978, 12(1):105-113. doi: 10.1177/003803857801200106
    [24]
    HERITAGE J. Action formulation and its epistemic (and other) backgrounds [J]. Discourse Studies, 2002, 15(10):551-78.
    [25]
    何伟,安德鲁·格特力. 生态语言学的学科属性及其分支生态文体学−安德鲁·格特力教授访谈录[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020,36(1):1-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2689.2020.01.001
  • Relative Articles

    [1]LEI Yang, WANG Shuzhen, ZHANG Fangwen. Retrospect and Prospect of Chinese Farmers’ Behavior Based on CiteSpace Quantitative Analysis[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(5): 108-118. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022090018
    [2]LIU Qinyu, WU Yaxin. A Multi-modal Conversation Analytic Study on Child-initiated Directives in Family Iteractions[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(3): 289-298. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022110091
    [3]DONG Boyu. The Referential Repair in the Parent/Child Interaction: A Conversation Analysis Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(3): 277-288. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022110093
    [4]ZHAO Bo-wen. An Analysis of the Register Mechanism and Interaction of “NP Zhi AP”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(1): 59-66. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021050078
    [5]LI Jian-yong, ZHANG Jian-ying. Grass-roots Government Behavior in the Modernization of Rural Governance: An Analytical Perspective of Rural Tax Reform[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(3): 323-330.
    [6]CHEN Yu-juan, LIU Yu-jie. Appraisers and Attitude Categories in Novels[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(5): 20-27.
    [7]CHEN Yong. Try to Discuss the Dynamic Changes of Semantics under the Category of Language——Take Number-Categories in Chinese and English for Examples[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(3): 17-22,26.
    [8]LU Jun, DUAN Xiang-wei. On the Absolute Freedom of Network Behaviour——Analysis of Network Behavior Based on Marxism's View[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(2): 88-92.
    [9]SUN Yong-mei, XU Hao. Organizational and Institutional Discourse Studies: Significance, Problems and Reflections[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(1): 40-46.
    [10]WANG Kun. Postmodern Thought Challenges and Intensional Changes in the Literary Theoretical Core Category[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(1): 39-44.
    [11]HE Ke-tai, YANG Hai-na, LI Su-jian. Investigation and Analysis on Doctor Candidates' Academic Misconduct[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(1): 78-82.
    [12]ZHENG Rui-kun, ZHAO Xin. The Legal Definition and Regulation Analysis of the Behavior of Microsoft's “Blank Screen”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(2): 62-65,112.
    [13]MA Zhen-chao. Analysis of the Current Religion Activity and Its Negative Effect on Social Political Stability[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(3): 55-59.
    [14]ZHAO Zhi-yuan, LI Xue-mei, FU Lin. An Exploration of the Research Range of Chinese County Economy[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 23-28.
    [15]LI Rui, CONG Xiao-feng. A Historical Review of the Range of Social Law[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 74-80.
    [16]ZHANG Mei. ZHUANG Zi Kou Yi's Study of ZHUANG Zi's Literature[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(1): 13-17,45.
    [17]JIAO Xiao-nan. The Influence of Profit Sharing on Managers' Behavior[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(2): 29-33.
    [18]TIAN Song. An Analysis on the Behavior and Psychology of Civil Science Fans[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(1): 46-52.
    [19]HE Li-ping. Economic Analysis of Charity[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(2): 5-11.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 徐婧. 从“亲权”到“亲责”:家庭教育的司法介入. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2025(02): 97-106 .
    2. 于国栋,李珍. “合理化”作为抱怨第三方回应行为的会话分析研究. 外语教学理论与实践. 2023(04): 1-11+25 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0401020304050
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 24.4 %FULLTEXT: 24.4 %META: 66.5 %META: 66.5 %PDF: 9.0 %PDF: 9.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 21.3 %其他: 21.3 %上海: 0.5 %上海: 0.5 %临汾: 0.5 %临汾: 0.5 %十堰: 1.4 %十堰: 1.4 %南京: 0.9 %南京: 0.9 %哥伦布: 0.9 %哥伦布: 0.9 %嘉兴: 0.9 %嘉兴: 0.9 %天津: 3.2 %天津: 3.2 %太原: 0.9 %太原: 0.9 %常州: 0.9 %常州: 0.9 %平顶山: 0.5 %平顶山: 0.5 %广安: 0.5 %广安: 0.5 %广州: 0.5 %广州: 0.5 %张家口: 1.4 %张家口: 1.4 %扬州: 1.8 %扬州: 1.8 %杭州: 0.9 %杭州: 0.9 %温州: 2.3 %温州: 2.3 %湖州: 0.9 %湖州: 0.9 %漯河: 4.1 %漯河: 4.1 %石家庄: 0.5 %石家庄: 0.5 %芒廷维尤: 14.9 %芒廷维尤: 14.9 %苏州: 0.5 %苏州: 0.5 %衡水: 2.3 %衡水: 2.3 %衡阳: 1.8 %衡阳: 1.8 %西宁: 2.3 %西宁: 2.3 %邯郸: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.5 %郑州: 29.0 %郑州: 29.0 %重庆: 0.5 %重庆: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %阳泉: 3.6 %阳泉: 3.6 %其他上海临汾十堰南京哥伦布嘉兴天津太原常州平顶山广安广州张家口扬州杭州温州湖州漯河石家庄芒廷维尤苏州衡水衡阳西宁邯郸郑州重庆长沙阳泉

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(6)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (519) PDF downloads(32) Cited by(2)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return