Study on Einstein’s Concept of Free Human Conscience

ZHOU De-hai

Volume 34 Issue 1

Jun. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2018 > 34(1): 79-87

ZHOU De-hai. Study on Einstein’s Concept of Free Human Conscience[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(1): 79-87.

Citation:

ZHOU De-hai. Study on Einstein’s Concept of Free Human Conscience[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(1): 79-87.

ZHOU De-hai. Study on Einstein’s Concept of Free Human Conscience[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(1): 79-87.

Citation:

ZHOU De-hai. Study on Einstein’s Concept of Free Human Conscience[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(1): 79-87.

PDF( 454 KB)

Study on Einstein’s Concept of Free Human Conscience

ZHOU De-hai

Scientific Research Office, Hefei Administration College, Chaohu 238000, China

Received Date: 2017-11-21
Available Online: 2021-06-01
Publish Date: 2021-06-01

Abstract

Abstract

At present, there is few research on Einstein’s concept of conscience. Einstein’s concept of free human conscience stems from belief in moral religion. Belief in the universal religion of god brings about such a high of human conscience. His pursuit of personal freedom brings about such a state of free conscience. Einstein’s concept of free human conscience has many positive effects on the developments of human society, logical socialism, the reform of state laws and the alignment of social and individual morality. But there are also many limitations in Einstein’s concept of free human conscience. It is extremely fragile in front of brutal tyranny and it can not exist without abundant material conditions. It is also lack of capricious and random nature.
- Einstein,
- concept of free human conscience,
- positive effects,
- limitations

FullText(HTML)

References(33)

References

[1]	广东, 广西, 湖南, 河南辞源修订组, 商务印书馆编辑部.辞源(合订本)[Z].北京:商务印书馆, 1988.
[2]	杨伯峻.孟子译注(下)[M].北京:中华书局, 1960.
[3]	张秋梅.当代西方天主教自然法学派的良心观[J].宗教学研究, 2006, (1):202-205.
[4]	徐贲.当代犬儒主义的良心与希望[J].读书, 2014, (7):29-37.
[5]	胡耀祖.“良心”应该正本清源[J].读书, 1981, (4):43.
[6]	桐志.“万元肚”与不昧“良心”[J].道德与文明, 1995, (6):42.
[7]	柴芳幽.我凭良心挣钱[J].光彩, 1996, (9):20-21.
[8]	陈相, 何芝莹.记者的良心[J].新闻窗, 2010, (2):124-125.
[9]	唐映红.用心理学来分析:官员何以“听到真话”很难[N].报刊文摘, 2015-12-25(2).
[10]	李醒民.论科学家的科学良心:爱因斯坦的启示[J].科学文化评论, 2005, (2):92-99.
[11]	周德海.论爱因斯坦的科学技术与道德伦理思想——兼评学术界对爱因斯坦“科技伦理”思想的研究[J].伦理学, 2014, (2):74-81.
[12]	周德海.论爱因斯坦的两种性质不同的道德和伦理[J].重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, (4):51-61.
[13]	[美]爱因斯坦.爱因斯坦文集(增补本)第3卷[M].北京:商务印书馆, 2009.
[14]	张祎.美科学家发现动物也有道德观[EB/OL].新华网. 2009-05-25[2015-11 -21]. http://news.xinhuanet.com/world/2009-05/25/content_11428754.htm(/.
[15]	新华社北京10月23日专电.瑞士科学家:人脑有个“公平中心”[EB/OL].2006-10-24 [2015-11-21]. http://scitech.people.com.cn/GB/4951578.html.
[16]	[美]爱因斯坦.爱因斯坦文集(增补本)第1卷[M].北京:商务印书馆, 2009.
[17]	束美新口述. 许水涛采访.束星北的家人和友人[J].炎黄春秋, 2016, (6):18-23.
[18]	P.米切耳莫尔.阿耳伯特·爱因斯坦[A].纪念爱因斯坦译文集[C].上海:上海科学技术出版社, 1979.
[19]	[美]A.佩斯.“上帝是微妙的……”——爱因斯坦的科学与生平[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社, 1988.
[20]	周德海.有秩序的和谐社会——爱因斯坦的社会观[J].重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, (4):88-94.
[21]	华桂宏, 王小锡.四论道德资本[J].江苏社会科学, 2006, (6):223-228.
[22]	王海明.良心本性论[J].甘肃理论学刊, 2007, (4):29-33.
[23]	周德海.论“经济人”的道德——兼评目前学术界对“经济人”的研究[J].管理学刊, 2013, (2):12-16.
[24]	[美]海伦·杜卡斯, 巴纳希·霍夫曼编.爱因斯坦谈人生[M].北京:世界知识出版社, 1984.
[25]	C.弗吕克基格.爱因斯坦在伯尔尼[A].纪念爱因斯坦译文集[C].上海:上海科学技术出版社, 1979.138-139.
[26]	伊富.爱因斯坦途经上海的短暂旅程[J].纵横, 2005, (1):49-53.
[27]	聂世镛.崇拜自然尊仰生命——纪念爱因斯坦(1879—1955) 诞生123 周年[J].北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2002, (2):5 -10.
[28]	周德海.论黑格尔法哲学理论体系中的自由概念[J].中共济南市委党校学报, 2011, (1):19-24.
[29]	H.玻恩.谈谈与爱因斯坦的私人交往[A].纪念爱因斯坦译文集[C].上海:上海科学技术出版社, 1979.
[30]	萧剑.爱因斯坦与玛加丽达[J].档案春秋.2016, (6):47-51.
[31]	诚夫. 爱因斯坦的“三角恋情[J].世界文化.2003, (2):29-30,33.
[32]	小梅.爱因斯坦曾长期被“监控”[J].国家安全通讯.2002, (10):55-56.
[33]	资中筠.从“牢不可破”到反目成仇[J].炎黄春秋, 2014, (12):24-33.

Relative Articles

[1]	ZHOU De-hai. Einstein's Outlook on Society[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(1): 107-118.
[2]	YANG Lin-xiu, ZHAO Hao. The Discourse of Hope: Review of Positive Discourse Studies in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(3): 35-41.
[3]	HU An-qi, WANG Qing-xia. An Exploration of the Foundation of Basil Bernstein’s Sociology of Language and Its Theoretical Significance[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(5): 14-19.
[4]	HU An-qi, WANG Qing-xia. An Overview of Halliday and Hasan's Studies on Basil Bernstein's Code Theory from the Perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(1): 26-32.
[5]	ZHANG You-guo, LIN Pei-yuan. Comparative Analysis and Enlightenment of Kazakhstan and Singapore’s Authoritarian Political System[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(2): 106-111.
[6]	SHI Li-rong, LIU Yu. The Limited Intervention and Reasonable Extension of the Supervisory Authority of Government by Organizational Boundary[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(3): 108-112.
[7]	JI Chao. Explanation of “Knowledge-Power” under State Intervention[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(2): 141-147.
[8]	CHENG Wei. Positive Discourse Analysis: Harmonious Attitudinal Prosody——A Study of Chinese Tour Guide Commentary[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(2): 113-118.
[9]	YE Zhi-peng. Liberty,Democracy and Rule of Law——On Hayeke's Liberty Thoughts[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(4): 61-66.
[10]	XIAO Fu-ping. On Kant's Freedom of Rational Being and Heidegger's Value of Dasein[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 142-145.
[11]	PANG Nan. The Logical End of Limitation for Public Freedom in Human Being—On Hannah Arendt's Theory of Political Action and Legal Institution[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(4): 145-149,153.
[12]	XU Ying. A Detailed Analysis of Metafunctions of “Education for Independent Thought”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 107-111,124.
[13]	SHEN Min-rong. Analysis on the Thoughts of Natural Person: Sources and Meaning[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 66-73,84.
[15]	LIU Hong-liang. Einstein's Thought Heritage and the Modern Time[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(2): 1-5.
[16]	WEI Zeng-chan. Research on the Judicial Activism in WTO Dispute Settlement[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(3): 28-36.
[17]	CENG Ji-mao. QIAN Mu's Research on Ancient Chinese Political Civilization and Its Defects[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(1): 69-72.
[18]	LIU Wen-xia. On Einstein's Idea of Unity[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(3): 81-83.
[19]	FENG Ying. The Explanation of YAN Fu's Definition about Liberty[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(4): 57-60.