On Kant's Freedom of Rational Being and Heidegger's Value of Dasein

XIAO Fu-ping

Volume 26 Issue 3

Jun. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2010 > 26(3): 142-145

XIAO Fu-ping. On Kant's Freedom of Rational Being and Heidegger's Value of Dasein[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 142-145.

Citation:

XIAO Fu-ping. On Kant's Freedom of Rational Being and Heidegger's Value of Dasein[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 142-145.

XIAO Fu-ping. On Kant's Freedom of Rational Being and Heidegger's Value of Dasein[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 142-145.

Citation:

XIAO Fu-ping. On Kant's Freedom of Rational Being and Heidegger's Value of Dasein[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 142-145.

PDF( 194 KB)

On Kant's Freedom of Rational Being and Heidegger's Value of Dasein

XIAO Fu-ping

Department of Foreign Language Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China

Received Date: 2010-08-20
Available Online: 2021-06-26

Abstract

Abstract

The actuality of freedom can only be demonstrated on the basis of rational being or of the process of "Dasein";the actuality of freedom is indicating necessary "factual acting" of existence of pure principles which determine the experiential objects;freedom, as the essence of human being, is both transcendental and active, and necessarily comes out in the unity of world centered by human being;every way to further study on freedom results from the new choice and deconstruction based on the old theories, this is true for both Kant and Heidegger;thus when we try to hold on freedom, we are in fact advancing towards the path of self-being, and insight the truth of "Dasein".
- reason,
- freedom,
- being,
- Dasein,
- practical reason

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	FENG Jun. Kant's Redefinition of Concept[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(6): 103-112.
[2]	DONG Jing-shu. On Puzzles in Basic Norm[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(5): 64-70.
[3]	LIU Chun-qiang. “Watch and See”: Chen Yinke's Educational Thoughts[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(2): 46-50.
[4]	SONG Ping-ming. Historical Evaluation of Chen Boda and the New Enlightenment Movement[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(5): 112-117.
[5]	SUN Bo. Between the “Speculativeness” and Contemplation of Nature——On the Natural Dialectics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(2): 13-17.
[6]	YE Zhi-peng. Liberty,Democracy and Rule of Law——On Hayeke's Liberty Thoughts[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(4): 61-66.
[7]	FANG Qing, SHA Zong-ping. Presence of God——An Analysis on the Role of God in the Thoughts of Locke[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(2): 160-164.
[8]	ZHANG Xiao-xi. Freedom and Equality Deduced in Logic——A Comparison between Rousseau's Thoughts and Ma Junwu's Perception[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(1): 46-50.
[9]	WANG Lian-wei, CHEN Man-qing. The Logic of Constitutionalism in the Context of Moral Philosophy——on Kant's Constitutional Thought[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(3): 34-37.
[10]	XU Ke. The Problem of Reasonableness Spirit in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(4): 127-131.
[11]	LI Rong. The Variation of Reason and Life——The Significance of Husseri's Life-world Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(4): 132-135.
[12]	XU Xiao-cun. The Rationally Objective Attitude in Acdenic Research——a flank of Wang Yao's research characteristics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(2): 58-61.
[13]	FENG Ying. To Achieve Liberty Step by Step——On YAN Fu's Thoughts of Social Change[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(4): 63-66.
[14]	ZHANG Wei-zhong. The Cultural Thihking of the Thirteen Books of Euclid's Elements[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(1): 70-73.
[15]	FENG Ying. The Explanation of YAN Fu's Definition about Liberty[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(4): 57-60.
[16]	YU Hui-yuan. “Nothing”——the Philosophical Dimension of Freedom --on Sartre's Thought of “Nothing”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(4): 52-56.
[17]	LI Wan-ping. Value and Fulfillment of the Right to Silence[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 76-79.