Mathematics in the Post-modern Perspective

ZHANG Jun-qing; WANG Bao-hong

Volume 26 Issue 1

Jun. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2010 > 26(1): 138-143

ZHANG Jun-qing, WANG Bao-hong. Mathematics in the Post-modern Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(1): 138-143.

Citation:

ZHANG Jun-qing, WANG Bao-hong. Mathematics in the Post-modern Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(1): 138-143.

ZHANG Jun-qing, WANG Bao-hong. Mathematics in the Post-modern Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(1): 138-143.

Citation:

ZHANG Jun-qing, WANG Bao-hong. Mathematics in the Post-modern Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(1): 138-143.

PDF( 235 KB)

Mathematics in the Post-modern Perspective

ZHANG Jun-qing¹,
WANG Bao-hong²

1. Changzhi College, Changzhi 046011, China;
2. Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China

Received Date: 2009-12-01
Available Online: 2021-06-26

Abstract

Abstract

Through a unique dialogue perspective on post-modernism, we find that mathematics both in content and ideas has experienced a process of fission and polymerization from reflecting, going beyond and gradually reconstructing.In this process, the mathematical function has gone down from interpretation system with the natural world to the logical system, and further complete rational basis self-deconstruction on rational basis.Contemporary mathematics and mathematical ideas show more obvious features of post-modernism.
- the post-modern mathematics,
- mathematical function,
- mathematical rationality,
- philosophy of mathematics

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	YAN Shiqing. On the Philosophical Implications of the Semogenesis Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(2): 70-77. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023020064
[2]	ZHANG Jian-xiu, LI Guo-qing. An Analysis and Discussion on Retranslation of Classics from the Perspective of Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(2): 38-46.
[3]	XIANG Da-jun. A Functional Approach to “Rang” in Modern Chinese[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(6): 10-17.
[4]	HE Zhong-qing, WANG Ke-yuan. A Functional Language Analysis Approach to the Cohesive Features in Mathematical Discourse[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(5): 1-6.
[5]	DAN Xiao-hong. The Study of Independent “de” Nominal Group in Modern Chinese: A Functional Approach[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(1): 37-43.
[6]	AI Shi-wei. On the Mathematical Foundation of Alain Badiou’s Philosophical Thoughts[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(4): 104-111.
[7]	HE Wei, GAO Jian-hui. Phase in Modern Mandarin Chinese: A Systemic Functional Approach[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(6): 26-36.
[8]	HE Wei, LV Yi. Chinese Tense: A Systemic Functional Approach[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(4): 9-18.
[9]	HE Wei, FU Li. Modern Chinese Aspect: A Systemic Functional Linguistic Approach[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(3): 10-19.
[10]	LIU Da-chun, WU Zhan-zhao. On the Rationality of Scientific Theory Choice from the Perspective of Historical Turn——By Comparing the Standard of Theory Choice of Kuhn and Lakatos[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(3): 87-92,108.
[11]	WANG Kun. Postmodern Thought Challenges and Intensional Changes in the Literary Theoretical Core Category[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(1): 39-44.
[12]	ZHU Hai-lin. Possibility: the Realization Realm of Post-modern Moral Freedom[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 154-159.
[13]	LIU Guang-xin, HU You-feng. Rational Reflections on the Textbooks of Literature Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 114-117.
[14]	WANG Hong-zhe. The Legal Philosophy of Critical Rationalism: Albert's Opinions and Method[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(4): 74-79.
[15]	XU Ke. The Problem of Reasonableness Spirit in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(4): 127-131.
[16]	WANG Zhuo, SUN Xiao-zhen. Postmodernist Poetry in America[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(2): 38-42.
[17]	ZHANG Hong-gen, DOU Lan-feng. Philosophical Perspective on Modern Scientific Methodology[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(3): 31-36.