Volume 35 Issue 2
May  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition)  > 2019  >  35(2): 1-17
HE Wei, LIU Jia-huan. A Contrastive Study of the Logico-semantic Relations and Their Representations between English and Chinese Clauses[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(2): 1-17.
Citation: HE Wei, LIU Jia-huan. A Contrastive Study of the Logico-semantic Relations and Their Representations between English and Chinese Clauses[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(2): 1-17.
shu

A Contrastive Study of the Logico-semantic Relations and Their Representations between English and Chinese Clauses

  • The National Research Centre for Foreign Language Education, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing 100089, China

  • Received Date: 2019-01-16
    Available Online: 2021-05-24
    Abstract
  • This research contrasts the logico-semantic relations between English and Chinese clauses in the dimensions of types and representations of logico-semantic relations in order to reveal the differences between English and Chinese people in terms of cognition.The result shows that in terms of types of logico-semantic relations, in English the enhancement type is the most frequently used while in Chinese the extension type is the most frequently employed.And in English, the logico-semantic relations are often indicated by boundary markers while in Chinese, they are often implied by the semantic meanings between clauses.As for the representation of enhancement, reasons or conditions come after results in English while it is the other way round in Chinese.And as for the representation of extension, boundary markers play an important role in English, but temporal sequence is significant in Chinese.These differences can be attributed to different cognition and psychology between western and Chinese people.Western people lay emphasis on logical reasoning while Chinese on perception and intuition.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(0)
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHANG Yubo, YANG Bingjun, DONG Baohua. Towards the Lexical Realization and the Grammatical System of the Finiteness in the Chinese Clause: A Functional Typological Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(4): 63-74. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023090096
    [2]WU Suwei, GUO Ying. Gestural Representation of Vertical Metaphor of Moral Concept in Chinese[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(5): 574-582. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022080042
    [3]HE Wei, ZHONG Wei. Reconsideration of the Taxis between Clauses within the Framework of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(4): 431-437. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023030024
    [4]XU Hu-cheng, ZHU Ti-zheng. Legal Regulation of Malicious Payment with Large Amounts of Coins[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(4): 439-448. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022060005
    [5]WANG Zhu, ZHANG Tian-wei. Gapping in Mandarin Chinese: A Language Information Structure Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(4): 23-32.
    [6]XIONG Xue-liang. Vertical Extension Analysis of GIVE Di-transitive Construction[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(5): 6-11,18.
    [7]ZHONG Wei, HE Wei. Textual Metafunction of Nonfinite Clauses in Chinese[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(6): 25-30.
    [8]MIAO Xing-wei, LIU Li-hua. A Cognitive Semantic Study of Transitive Phrasal Verbs with Up[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(3): 20-25.
    [9]DU Juan. The Textual Organizing Functions of Text-final Answer-providing Questions in English Political Speeches[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(4): 19-25.
    [10]ZHANG Ke-ding. English Locative-Subject Clause: Its Formation Mechanism and Intrinsic Semantic Feature of Theme[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(4): 1-8.
    [11]WANG Gen-lian. An Interpretation of the Syntactics and Semantics of “Fact” Projection[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(3): 10-16.
    [12]XIA Hong. English Dynamic Modality for Logical Argumentation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(4): 50-53.
    [13]HE Qing-shun. A Non-finite Clausal Perspective to Textual Metaphor[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(6): 2-7.
    [14]ZHANG Chun-yan. Mood as the Key Criterion for Parataxis and Parataxis in Clause Complexes[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(4): 37-43.
    [15]ZHANG Chun-yan. A Systemic Functional Analysis of the “Preposition + Clause” Structure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(1): 48-55.
    [16]CHEN Yang. The Relationship between Elements of Clause Structure and Participant Roles[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(1): 33-38.
    [17]LU Guo-jun. An Overview of the Cognitive Research on Polysemous Words in English[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 24-30.
    [18]HE Wei. Tense in the Non-finite Clause[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(1): 96-107.
    [19]Written by Robin P. FAWCETT. A Semantic System Network for MOOD in English[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 89-100.
    [20]FUSAITE Luo-bin. A Semantic System Network for MOOD in English[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(2): 83-98.
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(12)

    1. 杨璐. 从汉语“是”字比较句及其英译看汉英主客离合特质差异. 西藏民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2024(03): 130-137 .
    2. 何伟，仲伟. 系统功能语言学视角下的小句配列关系再思考. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2023(04): 431-437 .
    3. 高皓章，唐友，辛鹏，朱国东. 基于TransUnet的田间杂草分割研究. 无线互联科技. 2023(15): 100-103 .
    4. 何伟，闫煜菲. 汉英的主客融合及分离特质——以流水句及其英译为例. 上海翻译. 2022(01): 34-39 .
    5. 胡钰. 生态语言学视角下环保公示语的逻辑关系——以合肥市环保公示语为例. 湖北文理学院学报. 2022(07): 57-61 .
    6. 何伟，伟圣鑫. 英汉小句状语成分分布对比研究. 外语与外语教学. 2021(02): 39-48+148 .
    7. 何伟，程铭. 生态语言学视角下的逻辑关系系统. 解放军外国语学院学报. 2021(03): 51-59+160 .
    8. 何伟，仲伟. 从语言元功能的编码方式看英汉语本质差异. 当代修辞学. 2021(05): 26-36 .
    9. 潘杰，原苏荣. 语篇连接在GRE语文逻辑填空中的应用考察研究. 齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2021(09): 33-38 .
    10. 宋燕青，杨劲松. 从情景语境和篇章元功能的视角走进经典传递经典——以《第二次世界大战回忆录》的翻译为例. 长春大学学报. 2021(11): 73-77 .
    11. 陈曦. China Daily环境新闻报道的小句间逻辑语义关系研究. 国际公关. 2020(05): 188+190 .
    12. 何伟，马宸. 生态语言学视角下的衔接与连贯. 北京第二外国语学院学报. 2020(02): 26-45 .

    Other cited types(23)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04051015202530
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 18.3 %FULLTEXT: 18.3 %META: 75.6 %META: 75.6 %PDF: 6.1 %PDF: 6.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 6.6 %其他: 6.6 %China: 0.2 %China: 0.2 %Greece: 0.5 %Greece: 0.5 %[]: 0.3 %[]: 0.3 %上海: 0.9 %上海: 0.9 %北京: 4.1 %北京: 4.1 %南京: 0.6 %南京: 0.6 %南昌: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %南通: 0.2 %南通: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %天津: 0.2 %天津: 0.2 %宣城: 0.5 %宣城: 0.5 %广州: 0.5 %广州: 0.5 %成都: 0.8 %成都: 0.8 %扬州: 0.3 %扬州: 0.3 %新奥尔良: 0.5 %新奥尔良: 0.5 %昆明: 0.3 %昆明: 0.3 %杭州: 0.5 %杭州: 0.5 %武汉: 0.2 %武汉: 0.2 %氹仔: 0.2 %氹仔: 0.2 %江门: 0.3 %江门: 0.3 %济南: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %淄博: 0.2 %淄博: 0.2 %漯河: 0.5 %漯河: 0.5 %爱丁堡: 0.6 %爱丁堡: 0.6 %珠海: 0.9 %珠海: 0.9 %石家庄: 0.5 %石家庄: 0.5 %芒廷维尤: 40.2 %芒廷维尤: 40.2 %衢州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %西宁: 37.0 %西宁: 37.0 %贵阳: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %郑州: 1.1 %郑州: 1.1 %锦州: 0.2 %锦州: 0.2 %长沙: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %其他ChinaGreece[]上海北京南京南昌南通哈尔滨哥伦布嘉兴天津宣城广州成都扬州新奥尔良昆明杭州武汉氹仔江门济南淄博漯河爱丁堡珠海石家庄芒廷维尤衢州西宁贵阳郑州锦州长沙

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (483) PDF downloads(39) Cited by(35)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © Journal of Univeraity of Science and Technology Beijing.京ICP备13030111号

    Address：Room 305, Library, 30 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing (100083)   website：https://bkds.ustb.edu.cn/   Tel：010-62334089

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return