Volume 33 Issue 1
May  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition)  > 2017  >  33(1): 48-55
FENG Ying. The Explanation of YAN Fu's Definition about Liberty[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(4): 57-60.
Citation: YUAN Li. Tea and Coffee: The Comparison of the Chinese-Western Way of Thinking[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(1): 48-55.
shu

Tea and Coffee: The Comparison of the Chinese-Western Way of Thinking

  • School of Philosophy, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

  • Received Date: 2016-09-10
    Abstract
  • Differences in ways of thinking are the important causes of cultural differences, and the differences between tea culture and coffee culture may be due to the different Chinese and Western ways of thinking. It is a good way for us to understand the culture of tea and coffee by exploring the different ways of thinking that behind the Chinese and Western cultures. The tea culture represents a holistic, processual, relational and intuitive thinking, as tea transcends its natural attributes and becomes a carrier of Chinese traditional moral and spiritual ideals; while the Western coffee culture manifests a binary, linear and logical thinking, and coffee is considered as an object to be researched and used scientifically and rationally, and itself seldom be taken as a intermediary for value bearer.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(0)
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]LIANG Feng. The Crisis of Contemporary Individualism and the Breakthrough of Classic Liberalism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(4): 80-84,112.
    [2]LIU Chun-qiang. “Watch and See”: Chen Yinke's Educational Thoughts[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(2): 46-50.
    [3]SONG Ping-ming. Historical Evaluation of Chen Boda and the New Enlightenment Movement[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(5): 112-117.
    [4]ZHANG Ti-kun, SONG Ying-hui. The Misreading and Methodology Criticism of “Chinese Liberalism Literature”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(2): 44-49.
    [5]ZHANG Ti-kun. Discourse Construction and Theory Interpretation of Chinese Liberalism Literature——And Criticism of Some Extensive Liberalism Tendencies[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(2): 24-29.
    [6]XIAO Fu-ping. On Kant's Freedom of Rational Being and Heidegger's Value of Dasein[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 142-145.
    [7]YE Zhi-peng. Liberty,Democracy and Rule of Law——On Hayeke's Liberty Thoughts[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(4): 61-66.
    [8]PANG Jin-you. Analysis of the Weak Government Theory of Modern Western Liberalism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(4): 32-37.
    [9]FANG Qing, SHA Zong-ping. Presence of God——An Analysis on the Role of God in the Thoughts of Locke[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(2): 160-164.
    [10]WANG Lian-wei, CHEN Man-qing. The Logic of Constitutionalism in the Context of Moral Philosophy——on Kant's Constitutional Thought[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(3): 34-37.
    [11]TANG De-long. Essence and Reality Appealing of Limited Government[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 61-65.
    [12]ZHANG Xiao-xi. Freedom and Equality Deduced in Logic——A Comparison between Rousseau's Thoughts and Ma Junwu's Perception[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(1): 46-50.
    [13]LIANG Feng. The Internal Crisis of Liberalism and Hayek[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(3): 149-155,161.
    [14]CHEN You-liang. Evolutionism and Utilitarian: Interpretation of Modern Scientific Thought by Yan Fu[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(1): 44-47.
    [15]CHEN Yu-wu. Rethinking Yan Fu's Charactericistics of Liberalists[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(4): 125-130.
    [16]LI Yi. On the Critical Legal Studies of International Law[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(2): 52-54.
    [17]FENG Ying. To Achieve Liberty Step by Step——On YAN Fu's Thoughts of Social Change[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(4): 63-66.
    [18]YU Hui-yuan. “Nothing”——the Philosophical Dimension of Freedom --on Sartre's Thought of “Nothing”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(4): 52-56.
    [19]LI Wan-ping. Value and Fulfillment of the Right to Silence[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 76-79.
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040255075100125150
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 28.1 %FULLTEXT: 28.1 %META: 69.0 %META: 69.0 %PDF: 2.8 %PDF: 2.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 12.1 %其他: 12.1 %其他: 1.3 %其他: 1.3 %Central District: 0.2 %Central District: 0.2 %China: 0.1 %China: 0.1 %Crace: 0.1 %Crace: 0.1 %Discovery Bay: 0.1 %Discovery Bay: 0.1 %Hanoi: 0.1 %Hanoi: 0.1 %Malvern: 0.2 %Malvern: 0.2 %Nahant: 0.1 %Nahant: 0.1 %Saitama: 0.1 %Saitama: 0.1 %Singapore: 0.1 %Singapore: 0.1 %[]: 0.3 %[]: 0.3 %三门峡: 0.0 %三门峡: 0.0 %上海: 1.7 %上海: 1.7 %不列颠哥伦比亚省: 0.1 %不列颠哥伦比亚省: 0.1 %东京: 0.2 %东京: 0.2 %东京都: 0.0 %东京都: 0.0 %东莞: 0.0 %东莞: 0.0 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %丽水: 0.1 %丽水: 0.1 %乌鲁木齐: 0.6 %乌鲁木齐: 0.6 %乐山: 0.2 %乐山: 0.2 %九江: 0.1 %九江: 0.1 %伦敦: 0.1 %伦敦: 0.1 %克拉玛依: 0.1 %克拉玛依: 0.1 %加来海峡省: 0.1 %加来海峡省: 0.1 %北京: 2.9 %北京: 2.9 %十堰: 0.6 %十堰: 0.6 %华盛顿州: 0.1 %华盛顿州: 0.1 %南京: 1.2 %南京: 1.2 %南宁: 0.6 %南宁: 0.6 %南昌: 0.4 %南昌: 0.4 %南通: 0.0 %南通: 0.0 %双鸭山: 0.4 %双鸭山: 0.4 %台州: 0.8 %台州: 0.8 %合肥: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %吉安: 0.0 %吉安: 0.0 %吉隆坡: 0.0 %吉隆坡: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %唐山: 0.4 %唐山: 0.4 %商洛: 0.1 %商洛: 0.1 %喀什: 0.1 %喀什: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %大连: 0.2 %大连: 0.2 %天津: 1.7 %天津: 1.7 %太原: 0.3 %太原: 0.3 %威海: 0.1 %威海: 0.1 %宁波: 0.2 %宁波: 0.2 %安康: 0.4 %安康: 0.4 %安阳: 0.0 %安阳: 0.0 %宣城: 0.9 %宣城: 0.9 %宿迁: 0.1 %宿迁: 0.1 %常州: 1.3 %常州: 1.3 %平顶山: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %广安: 0.5 %广安: 0.5 %广州: 1.3 %广州: 1.3 %廊坊: 0.1 %廊坊: 0.1 %延边: 0.1 %延边: 0.1 %张家口: 0.5 %张家口: 0.5 %徐州: 0.2 %徐州: 0.2 %德州: 0.0 %德州: 0.0 %意法半: 0.1 %意法半: 0.1 %成都: 1.3 %成都: 1.3 %扬州: 1.0 %扬州: 1.0 %揭阳: 0.2 %揭阳: 0.2 %新加坡: 0.4 %新加坡: 0.4 %无锡: 0.0 %无锡: 0.0 %昆明: 2.1 %昆明: 2.1 %朝阳: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.1 %来宾: 0.1 %来宾: 0.1 %杭州: 1.5 %杭州: 1.5 %格兰特县: 0.3 %格兰特县: 0.3 %格拉茨: 0.1 %格拉茨: 0.1 %桂林: 0.1 %桂林: 0.1 %武汉: 0.7 %武汉: 0.7 %江门: 0.1 %江门: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %沧州: 0.1 %沧州: 0.1 %泰州: 0.2 %泰州: 0.2 %济南: 1.0 %济南: 1.0 %海口: 0.5 %海口: 0.5 %淄博: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %淮安: 0.6 %淮安: 0.6 %深圳: 1.6 %深圳: 1.6 %温哥华: 0.1 %温哥华: 0.1 %温州: 0.8 %温州: 0.8 %湖州: 0.5 %湖州: 0.5 %湘潭: 0.6 %湘潭: 0.6 %湘西: 0.0 %湘西: 0.0 %漯河: 5.5 %漯河: 5.5 %澳门: 0.2 %澳门: 0.2 %烟台: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %珠海: 0.7 %珠海: 0.7 %盐城: 0.1 %盐城: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.7 %石家庄: 0.7 %福州: 0.8 %福州: 0.8 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %纽约: 0.1 %纽约: 0.1 %胡志明: 0.2 %胡志明: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 25.0 %芒廷维尤: 25.0 %芝加哥: 1.2 %芝加哥: 1.2 %苏州: 0.7 %苏州: 0.7 %茂名: 0.0 %茂名: 0.0 %荆州: 0.2 %荆州: 0.2 %葵涌: 0.0 %葵涌: 0.0 %蚌埠: 0.2 %蚌埠: 0.2 %衡水: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.2 %衢州: 0.3 %衢州: 0.3 %西宁: 7.5 %西宁: 7.5 %西安: 1.1 %西安: 1.1 %西雅图: 0.1 %西雅图: 0.1 %资阳: 0.0 %资阳: 0.0 %赣州: 0.0 %赣州: 0.0 %达州: 0.0 %达州: 0.0 %运城: 0.2 %运城: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %郑州: 0.6 %郑州: 0.6 %都伯林: 0.2 %都伯林: 0.2 %重庆: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %钦州: 0.2 %钦州: 0.2 %铁岭: 0.2 %铁岭: 0.2 %银川: 0.1 %银川: 0.1 %长春: 0.1 %长春: 0.1 %长沙: 2.1 %长沙: 2.1 %阿德莱德: 0.1 %阿德莱德: 0.1 %青岛: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %马鞍山: 0.2 %马鞍山: 0.2 %黄冈: 0.1 %黄冈: 0.1 %黄石: 0.5 %黄石: 0.5 %齐齐哈尔: 0.0 %齐齐哈尔: 0.0 %其他其他Central DistrictChinaCraceDiscovery BayHanoiMalvernNahantSaitamaSingapore[]三门峡上海不列颠哥伦比亚省东京东京都东莞临汾丽水乌鲁木齐乐山九江伦敦克拉玛依加来海峡省北京十堰华盛顿州南京南宁南昌南通双鸭山台州合肥吉安吉隆坡呼和浩特哈尔滨唐山商洛喀什嘉兴大连天津太原威海宁波安康安阳宣城宿迁常州平顶山广安广州廊坊延边张家口徐州德州意法半成都扬州揭阳新加坡无锡昆明朝阳来宾杭州格兰特县格拉茨桂林武汉江门沈阳沧州泰州济南海口淄博淮安深圳温哥华温州湖州湘潭湘西漯河澳门烟台珠海盐城石家庄福州秦皇岛纽约胡志明芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州茂名荆州葵涌蚌埠衡水衡阳衢州西宁西安西雅图资阳赣州达州运城邯郸郑州都伯林重庆钦州铁岭银川长春长沙阿德莱德青岛马鞍山黄冈黄石齐齐哈尔

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1769) PDF downloads(92) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © Journal of Univeraity of Science and Technology Beijing.京ICP备13030111号

    Address：Room 305, Library, 30 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing (100083)   website：https://bkds.ustb.edu.cn/   Tel：010-62334089

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return