LIU Jinlin. Exploring the Personal Information Protection from the Perspective of Prosecutorial Public Interest Litigation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(3): 99-108. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023090022
Citation: LIU Jinlin. Exploring the Personal Information Protection from the Perspective of Prosecutorial Public Interest Litigation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(3): 99-108. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023090022

Exploring the Personal Information Protection from the Perspective of Prosecutorial Public Interest Litigation

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023090022
  • Received Date: 2023-09-05
  • Publish Date: 2024-04-19
  • The Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Protection of Personal Information clarifies the system of public interest litigation for the protection of personal information. Procuratorial authorities in the handling of public interest litigation cases related to personal information protection, face difficulties in pre-litigation handling problems, as well as issues related to the legal basis for prosecution, the definition of the connotation of “social public interest” in prosecution standards, and the order of prosecution subjects. The subjective reasons for the above-mentioned difficulties are twofold: firstly, failure to adjust concepts in a timely manner and insufficient utilization of external forces, and secondly, the need to improve one’s own abilities and insufficient initiative in fulfilling duties. The objective reasons mainly include careless legislation and the particularity of public interest litigation. To solve the above difficulties, procuratorial authorities should pay attention to the power of public security organs, courts, and other administrative organs to obtain evidence. The procuratorial authorities cannot file administrative public interest litigation in accordance with the Personal Information Protection Law, but can only file civil public interest litigation and file administrative public interest litigation in accordance with Article 25 (4) of the Administrative Litigation Law. The procuratorial authorities should not be the subject of post litigation for consumer organizations or other organizations. If the procuratorial authorities can file both civil public interest litigation and administrative public interest litigation, then it generally chooses administrative public interest litigation first. For property damage compensation, it is recommended to explore the application of legal compensation standards. The amount of compensation for moral damages should take into account the nature of the infringer’s fault and its degree, the motivation, means or ways of the infringing behavior, and the privacy of personal information.

     

  • [1]
    陈奇伟,聂琳峰. 个人信息公益诉讼:生成机理、适用困境与路径优化——基于203份裁判文书的实证分析[J]. 南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版),2022(3):54-63.
    [2]
    最高检发布检察机关个人信息保护公益诉讼典型案例——斩断个人信息侵权与电信网络诈骗之间的利益链条[EB/OL]. (2021-04-22)[2024-01-18]. https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/xwfbh/wsfbt/202104/t20210422_516357.shtml#1.
    [3]
    许身健,张涛. 个人信息保护检察公益诉讼的法理基础与制度完善[J]. 法学论坛,2023,38(1):95-110.
    [4]
    蒋红珍. 个人信息保护的行政公益诉讼[J]. 上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,30(5):28-38.
    [5]
    张坤. 以行政公益诉讼强化个人信息保护[N]. 检察日报,2023-05-11(3).
    [6]
    欧元捷. 公益治理体系下的个人信息保护公益诉讼[J]. 法律适用,2023,(12):57-64.
    [7]
    2021年检察机关办理个人信息保护领域公益诉讼2000余件[EB/OL]. (2022-03-08)[2023-08-18]. https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/ttzgjgzbg/202203/t20220308_548027.shtml.
    [8]
    巩固. 公益诉讼的属性及立法完善[J]. 国家检察官学院学报,2021,29(6):55-71.
    [9]
    张嘉军. 公益诉讼授权单行立法的“民事化”及其消解[J]. 国家检察官学院学报,2023,31(3):27-42.
    [10]
    张陈果. 个人信息保护民事公益诉讼的程序逻辑与规范解释——兼论个人信息保护的“消费者化”[J]. 国家检察官学院学报,2021,29(6):72-84.
    [11]
    汤维建,徐枭雄. 个人信息保护公益诉讼制度研究[J]. 人民检察,2023(5):13-18.
    [12]
    张新宝,赖成宇. 个人信息保护公益诉讼制度的理解与适用[J]. 国家检察官学院学报,2021,29(5):55-74.
    [13]
    刘加良. 检察公益诉讼调查核实权的规则优化[J]. 政治与法律,2020(10):148-161.
    [14]
    余凌云,郑志行. 个人信息保护行政公益诉讼的规范建构[J]. 人民检察,2022(5):31-36.
    [15]
    邵俊. 个人信息的检察公益诉讼保护路径研究[J]. 法治研究,2021(5):55-64.
    [16]
    雷达,郑旭江. 法秩序统一视野下“个人信息”的认定——从侵犯公民个人信息罪切入[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2023,39(3):310-319.
    [17]
    程啸. 侵害个人信息权益的侵权责任[J]. 中国法律评论,2021(5):59-69.
    [18]
    龚淋,付翠英. 隐私政策对个人信息的保护研究[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2023,39(1):111-119.
    [19]
    张斌,吴睿. 检察公益诉讼法正式启动立法程序 立法领导小组已成立[DB/OL]. (2023-12-25)[2023-12-27]. http://news.cnr.cn/native/gd/20231225/t20231225_526533694.shtml.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]LIAO Jianqiu, TIAN Bin. Optimising the Path and Rule of Spam Infringement Regulation: The Introduction of Punitive Damages[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(1): 94-105. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023020113
    [2]ZOU Kailiang, WANG Xindi. Compliance and Construction of Platform Enterprise Data from the Perspective of Sensitive Personal Information Protection[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(2): 87-93. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023040070
    [3]LEI Da, ZHENG Xujiang. Identification of “Personal Information” from the Perspective of Unity of Legal Order[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(3): 310-319. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022080012
    [4]GONG Lin, FU Cui-ying. Research on the Protection of Personal Information by Privacy Policy[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(1): 111-119. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022060035
    [5]LIAO Li-huan. The Normative Structure of Preventive Environmental Public Interest Litigation: Taking Article 1 of “The Interpretation of Several Issues on the Application of Law to Civil Public Interest Litigation Cases” as the Center[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(1): 66-73.
    [6]LIANG Ze-yu. On Protection of Shareholders' Term Interest: Based on Article 6 of the Summary of Civil and Commercial Judicial Work of National Courts[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(5): 67-73.
    [7]LI Man. Research on the Discretion on Irreparable Harm[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(5): 98-105.
    [8]LIU Ting-hua. Analysis of the Difficult Problems of “Birth Defects”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(5): 76-80.
    [9]WU Ru-qiao. Division and Cooperation: Relationship between the Subject and Object in Civil Evidence-collecting Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 77-84,89.
    [10]BAI Xiao-feng. Substantial and Procedural Issues on Protection of the Unborn[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(1): 70-74.
    [11]XIAO Jian-hua, CHEN Xue-meng. Analysis of Means of Secret Protection of Civil Evidence[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 75-83.
    [12]XIAO Jian-guo, HUANG Zhong-shun. Research on Problems in the Application of Discretional Undertaking[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(1): 54-62.
    [13]FENG Ying. On the Farmers' Right Disposition Process of Land and Interest Protection in the Collection[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(4): 89-93.
    [14]ZHANG Jun-yan. Liabilities for Breach of Contract and the Limits of Compensation for Damages[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(2): 59-62,72.
    [15]WANG Meng-fei. New study on the Object of Criminal Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(3): 48-51.
    [16]SHI Li-rong. A Study of Public Interest and Efficiency of Non-Profitable Organization Operation in the Market[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(4): 1-7.
    [17]BI Yu-qian. On Procedure of Saving Evidence from Damage[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 61-67.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 王义正,刘毅. 动因、意蕴与路径:个人信息保护公益诉讼履职现代化论析. 江西警察学院学报. 2024(05): 109-115 .
    2. 陈莉. 行政公益诉讼中行政机关依法履职识别标准. 人民检察. 2024(19): 67-69 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1098) PDF downloads(54) Cited by(2)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return