YAN Shiqing. On the Philosophical Implications of the Semogenesis Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(2): 70-77. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023020064
Citation: YAN Shiqing. On the Philosophical Implications of the Semogenesis Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(2): 70-77. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023020064

On the Philosophical Implications of the Semogenesis Theory

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023020064
  • Received Date: 2023-02-17
    Available Online: 2024-01-22
  • Publish Date: 2024-04-01
  • The denial of essentialism and commitment to constructivism are made explicit by Halliday and Matthiessen while proposing the evolutionary theory of meaning or the semogenesis theory, in echo with the disputes between essentialists (or logical empiricists) and constructivists in the 20th century Western academic arena of philosophy of science. The semogenesis theory inherits the European functionalists’ tradition that adopts the sociocultural perspective on the relationship between language and reality, which in turn sheds light on the insightfulness of the constructivist view on meaning. Furthermore, with the leading figures of the systemic school extending the semogenic approach to interdisciplinary studies of scientific genre, language programming, biology and sociology, etc., the applicability as well as the infinite potential for the development of systemic linguistics is fully demonstrated.

     

  • [1]
    DAVES M and RAVELLI L. Advances in Systemic Linguistics:Recent Theory and Practice [C]. London and New York:Pinter Publishers,1992.
    [2]
    HALLIDAY M A K. How do you mean? [C] // DAVIES M and RAVELLI L. Advances in Systemic Linguistics:Recent Theory and Practice. London, New York:Pinter Publishers,1992:20-35.
    [3]
    MATTHIESSEN C. Interpreting the textual metafunction [C] // DAVIES M and RAVELLI L. Advances in Systemic Linguistics:Recent Theory and Practice. London, New York:Pinter Publishers,1992:37-81.
    [4]
    严世清. 语法隐喻理论的发展及其理论意义[J]. 外国语,2003(3):51-57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5139.2003.03.008
    [5]
    严世清. 论语篇功能思想的元理论意义[J]. 外国语,2005(5):47-53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5139.2005.05.007
    [6]
    HALLIDAY M A K & MATTHIESSEN C. Construing Experience through Meaning:A Language-based Approach to Cognition [M]. London, New York:Continuum,1999.
    [7]
    严世清. 意义进化的机制及其理据[J]. 外语教学与研究,2012(1):45-53.
    [8]
    卢风. 两种科学观:本质主义与非本质主义[J]. 哲学动态,2008(10):68-76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-8862.2008.10.013
    [9]
    ORTONY A. Metaphor and Thought [C]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1979.
    [10]
    ORTONY A. Metaphor and Thought (2nd ed.) [C]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1993.
    [11]
    RUSSELL B. Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy [M],London:George Allan & Unwin Ltd. ,1919.
    [12]
    STRAWSON P F. On referring [J]. Mind,1950. 59(235):320-344.
    [13]
    DONNELLAN K. Reference and definite descriptions [J]. Philosophical Review,1966(77):281-304.
    [14]
    严世清. 功能主义语言学理论探索与应用[M]. 上海:上海外语教育出版社,2021.
    [15]
    PUTNAM H. Explanation and reference [C] // BOYD R,GASPER P & TROUT J D. The Philosophy of Science. Cambridge:MIT Press,1991:171-186.
    [16]
    BOYD R. Metaphor and theory change. What is “metaphor” a metaphor for? [C] // ORTONY A. Metaphor & Thought (2nd ed.). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1993:481-532.
    [17]
    KHUN T S. Metaphor in science [C] // ORTONY A. Metaphor & Thought (2nd ed.). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1993:533-542.
    [18]
    王猛. 西藏灰狼到藏獒的基因渗入研究[D]. 昆明:云南大学生命科学院,2016:41-43.
    [19]
    HALLIDAY M A K. Language and the reshaping of human experience [C] // WEBSTER J. The Language of Science. Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday (Vol. 5). London:Continuum,2004:7-23.
    [20]
    MARTIN J R. English Text:System and Structure [M]. Amsterdam:Benjamins,1992.
    [21]
    HALLIDAY M A K. Language as a Social Semiotic:The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning [M]. London:Edward and Arnold,1978.
    [22]
    BAKHTIN M M. The Dialogic Imagination:Four Essays [M]. Austin:University of Texas Press,1981.
    [23]
    HALLIDAY M A K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London:Edward and Arnold,1985.
    [24]
    胡壮麟. 语法隐喻[J]. 外语教学与研究,1996(4):1-7.
    [25]
    朱永生. 英语中的语法比喻现象[J]. 外国语,1994(1):8-13.
    [26]
    刘承宇. 概念语法隐喻对意义发生时空维度的影响[J]. 语言学研究,2016(2):33-43.
    [27]
    林正军,张姝祎. 语法隐喻的语义发生理据[J]. 外语与外语教学,2018,302(5):26-33. doi: 10.13458/j.cnki.flatt.004523
    [28]
    周海明. 韩礼德语篇建构观研究:意义进化视角 [M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社,2021.
    [29]
    MARTIN J R. Grammar meets genre:reflections on the “Sydney school”[C] // HUANG G W,CHANG C G,DAI F. Functional Linguistics as Appliable Linguistics. Guangzhou:Sun Yat-Sen University Press,2006:40-94.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]HE Wei, CAO Ren-ren. The Structure and Criticalness of Post-positivism: Comment on the Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas Kuhn[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(4): 70-76.
    [2]XIE Chui-ping. The Neurobiological Basis of Semogenesis: A Perspective of Neural Darwinism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(4): 49-55.
    [3]ZHENG Yao-fei, LIANG Min-shan. A Study of Nominalization in Pharmaceutical Research Articles[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(2): 13-22.
    [4]YU Hui, YU Ting-ting. A Study on the Function of Grammatical Metaphor in Knowledge Construction in Academic Discourse across Different Disciplines[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(2): 1-7.
    [5]KUANG Zhan, YANG Yi-long. The Meta-redundant Effect of Grammatical Metaphor[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(4): 17-22.
    [6]ZHANG Ke-ding. English Locative-Subject Clause: Its Formation Mechanism and Intrinsic Semantic Feature of Theme[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(4): 1-8.
    [7]XIE Shu-nuan. Comparative Study of Grammatical Metaphor in Chinese and Foreign Academic Discourses[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(1): 16-20.
    [8]HE Zhong-qing. The Development and Problems in Grammatical Metaphor Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(4): 10-17.
    [9]WANG Yong, ZHOU Ying-fang. The Grammar of Weather: With Special Reference to English and Chinese Weather Forecast Text[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(5): 9-17.
    [10]HE Qing-shun. A Non-finite Clausal Perspective to Textual Metaphor[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(6): 2-7.
    [11]ZHANG Jing-yuan, LIU Xiao. Grammatical Metaphor and Pragmatic Presupposition[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 17-21.
    [12]Jonathan Webster. Creativity and Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(4): 8-19.
    [13]ZHANG Ti-kun. Discourse Construction and Theory Interpretation of Chinese Liberalism Literature——And Criticism of Some Extensive Liberalism Tendencies[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(2): 24-29.
    [14]CENG Lei. An Approach to the Metaphorical Meanings of the Tense of Projecting Verbs in English Academic Discourse[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(2): 104-108.
    [15]ZHANG Wen-xi, BAN Bao-shen, MIAO Zhuang. Shift to Constructivism in Western National Interests Theory Research[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(2): 37-41,83.
    [16]XIAO Jian-hua, LI Zhi-feng. From Adversary System to Cooperative System[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(3): 55-62.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 王奕文. 道德概念是一种HPC概念吗?——浅议厚道德概念与道德概念自然化. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2025(01): 129-136 .
    2. 钟泽楠,朱冰霞,涂兵兰,陈靖. 人工智能辅助ESP语料库设计与建设——以金融英语为例. 中国ESP研究. 2024(04): 76-88+164-165 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-032025-042025-05010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 8.2 %FULLTEXT: 8.2 %META: 88.2 %META: 88.2 %PDF: 3.6 %PDF: 3.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 5.1 %其他: 5.1 %三门峡: 0.1 %三门峡: 0.1 %上海: 0.2 %上海: 0.2 %丽水: 1.0 %丽水: 1.0 %乐山: 0.2 %乐山: 0.2 %伦敦: 0.2 %伦敦: 0.2 %六安: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %北京: 2.9 %北京: 2.9 %十堰: 0.2 %十堰: 0.2 %南京: 1.2 %南京: 1.2 %南平: 0.3 %南平: 0.3 %南通: 0.7 %南通: 0.7 %厦门: 0.1 %厦门: 0.1 %台州: 2.3 %台州: 2.3 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %吉林: 0.8 %吉林: 0.8 %呼伦贝尔: 0.1 %呼伦贝尔: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.6 %咸阳: 0.6 %哥伦布: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.3 %嘉兴: 1.3 %嘉兴: 1.3 %大连: 1.4 %大连: 1.4 %天津: 0.5 %天津: 0.5 %威海: 0.7 %威海: 0.7 %宁德: 0.2 %宁德: 0.2 %宁波: 0.5 %宁波: 0.5 %安康: 0.5 %安康: 0.5 %宜春: 0.2 %宜春: 0.2 %宣城: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %宿迁: 0.5 %宿迁: 0.5 %常州: 0.2 %常州: 0.2 %常德: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %广元: 0.3 %广元: 0.3 %广州: 1.5 %广州: 1.5 %廊坊: 0.2 %廊坊: 0.2 %延安: 0.6 %延安: 0.6 %张家口: 1.1 %张家口: 1.1 %徐州: 1.1 %徐州: 1.1 %德州: 0.1 %德州: 0.1 %忻州: 0.1 %忻州: 0.1 %扬州: 2.1 %扬州: 2.1 %抚州: 1.1 %抚州: 1.1 %无锡: 0.9 %无锡: 0.9 %日照: 0.2 %日照: 0.2 %昆明: 0.3 %昆明: 0.3 %景德镇: 0.1 %景德镇: 0.1 %杭州: 3.0 %杭州: 3.0 %枣庄: 0.2 %枣庄: 0.2 %榆林: 0.2 %榆林: 0.2 %檀香山: 0.4 %檀香山: 0.4 %武汉: 0.1 %武汉: 0.1 %汕头: 0.9 %汕头: 0.9 %池州: 0.4 %池州: 0.4 %沈阳: 1.0 %沈阳: 1.0 %泉州: 0.6 %泉州: 0.6 %泸州: 0.4 %泸州: 0.4 %洛阳: 0.5 %洛阳: 0.5 %济南: 0.8 %济南: 0.8 %济源: 0.1 %济源: 0.1 %海东: 0.1 %海东: 0.1 %海西: 0.5 %海西: 0.5 %淮南: 0.1 %淮南: 0.1 %淮安: 1.0 %淮安: 1.0 %温州: 2.5 %温州: 2.5 %渭南: 0.7 %渭南: 0.7 %湖州: 2.6 %湖州: 2.6 %湘潭: 0.6 %湘潭: 0.6 %湘西: 1.1 %湘西: 1.1 %湛江: 0.1 %湛江: 0.1 %漯河: 1.5 %漯河: 1.5 %漳州: 0.8 %漳州: 0.8 %烟台: 0.3 %烟台: 0.3 %珠海: 0.3 %珠海: 0.3 %盐城: 0.7 %盐城: 0.7 %盘锦: 0.1 %盘锦: 0.1 %石家庄: 2.2 %石家庄: 2.2 %福州: 0.4 %福州: 0.4 %秦皇岛: 0.4 %秦皇岛: 0.4 %绍兴: 0.7 %绍兴: 0.7 %绵阳: 0.3 %绵阳: 0.3 %舟山: 2.1 %舟山: 2.1 %芒廷维尤: 13.9 %芒廷维尤: 13.9 %芜湖: 0.7 %芜湖: 0.7 %芝加哥: 0.8 %芝加哥: 0.8 %苏州: 1.0 %苏州: 1.0 %荆门: 1.4 %荆门: 1.4 %莆田: 0.2 %莆田: 0.2 %莱芜: 0.4 %莱芜: 0.4 %营口: 0.8 %营口: 0.8 %葫芦岛: 0.5 %葫芦岛: 0.5 %衢州: 0.3 %衢州: 0.3 %襄阳: 1.0 %襄阳: 1.0 %西宁: 5.1 %西宁: 5.1 %西安: 1.8 %西安: 1.8 %西隆: 0.2 %西隆: 0.2 %辽阳: 0.9 %辽阳: 0.9 %连云港: 1.0 %连云港: 1.0 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %邵阳: 0.6 %邵阳: 0.6 %郑州: 1.1 %郑州: 1.1 %郴州: 1.8 %郴州: 1.8 %重庆: 0.7 %重庆: 0.7 %金华: 0.9 %金华: 0.9 %铁岭: 0.5 %铁岭: 0.5 %铜陵: 0.4 %铜陵: 0.4 %锦州: 1.0 %锦州: 1.0 %长沙: 1.0 %长沙: 1.0 %雅安: 0.3 %雅安: 0.3 %鞍山: 1.7 %鞍山: 1.7 %鹰潭: 0.3 %鹰潭: 0.3 %黄山: 0.2 %黄山: 0.2 %黄石: 0.3 %黄石: 0.3 %其他三门峡上海丽水乐山伦敦六安北京十堰南京南平南通厦门台州合肥吉林呼伦贝尔咸阳哥伦布嘉兴大连天津威海宁德宁波安康宜春宣城宿迁常州常德广元广州廊坊延安张家口徐州德州忻州扬州抚州无锡日照昆明景德镇杭州枣庄榆林檀香山武汉汕头池州沈阳泉州泸州洛阳济南济源海东海西淮南淮安温州渭南湖州湘潭湘西湛江漯河漳州烟台珠海盐城盘锦石家庄福州秦皇岛绍兴绵阳舟山芒廷维尤芜湖芝加哥苏州荆门莆田莱芜营口葫芦岛衢州襄阳西宁西安西隆辽阳连云港邯郸邵阳郑州郴州重庆金华铁岭铜陵锦州长沙雅安鞍山鹰潭黄山黄石

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (905) PDF downloads(37) Cited by(2)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return