Volume 38 Issue 6
Dec.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LI Wei, KONG Fan-jing. Realization Path of Family Education Rights in Preventing Minors’ Addiction to Internet[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 695-705. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022060029
Citation: LI Wei, KONG Fan-jing. Realization Path of Family Education Rights in Preventing Minors’ Addiction to Internet[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 695-705. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022060029

Realization Path of Family Education Rights in Preventing Minors’ Addiction to Internet-Centered on Article 22 of Law of the People’s Republic of China on Family Education Promotion

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022060029
  • Received Date: 2022-04-21
    Available Online: 2022-11-21
  • Publish Date: 2022-12-05
  • The newly implemented Article 22 of the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Family Education Promotion is a legislative response to the problem of minors’ addiction to the Internet. The correct implementation of the right to family education in preventing minors from indulging in Internet behavior needs to be made clear in the scope of responsibility subject, the protection of special groups of minors, the balance between minors’ right to learn and the right to rest under “should be reasonably arranged”, and the determination of legal responsibility for network supervision. In the analysis of the problem, it is necessary to take “network” as an important consideration in determining the scope of “other guardians”, strengthen the family’s Internet supervision over special minors, respect and guarantee minors’ rights to study and rest, and explore the dynamic balance between the country’s external compulsion and the family’s internal autonomy. In the specific application of the rules of Article 22 of the Family Education Promotion Law, it is recommended to clarify the scope of “other guardians”, establish a classified guidance system for family education of special minor groups, construct quantitative standards for “reasonable arrangements”, and refine the liability provisions for the failure to fulfill the duty of family network supervision. Finally, the right to family education can play an active role in preventing minors from being addicted to the Internet on the track of the rule of law through the implementation of the above measures.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    国家统计局. 《中国儿童发展纲要(2011—2020年)》终期统计监测报告[EB/OL]. (2022-03-12)[2022-04-23]. http: //www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-12/21/content_5663694.htm.
    [2]
    杨娟. 家庭教育权的合法性及其在我国义务教育中的实践[J]. 现代教育管理,2011(1):86-88. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5485.2011.01.024
    [3]
    劳凯声. 把握家庭教育性质 推进家庭教育立法[J]. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版),2021(5):1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9142.2021.05.002
    [4]
    周文娟,翟刚学. 家庭教育法的逻辑起点[J]. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版),2021(5):13-15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9142.2021.05.005
    [5]
    王文东. 论权利和义务关系的对等性和非对等性[J]. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版),2007(5):49-56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9142.2007.05.008
    [6]
    邓静秋. 家庭教育促进法的宪法逻辑[J]. 苏州大学学报(教育科学版),2021,9(4):64-71.
    [7]
    叶强. 论作为基本权利的家庭教育权[J]. 财经法学,2018(2):75-94.
    [8]
    祁占勇,杜越. 家庭教育立法的现实诉求及其立法精神与技术[J]. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报,2020,19(1):24-31.
    [9]
    倪洪涛. 我国家庭教育国家立法的宪法依据[J]. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报,2021,20(5):81-88.
    [10]
    谢芳. 完善我国未成年人监护监督制度的原则及路径[J]. 中国青年社会科学,2021,40(1):126-132.
    [11]
    冯源. 儿童监护模式的现代转型与民法典的妥当安置[J]. 东方法学,2019(4):150-160. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1466.2019.04.013
    [12]
    陈鹏,康韩笑. 父母家庭教育的义务及其立法规制[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2021(3):34-44.
    [13]
    李松晓. 子女利益最大化原则视角下的惩戒权重构−对中国亲子法中惩戒权问题的思考[J]. 黑龙江社会科学,2014(4):114-118.
    [14]
    胡定荣. “虎妈”“狼爸”的教育学反思[J]. 教育学术月刊,2014(5):31-35. doi: 10.16477/j.cnki.issn1674-2311.2014.05.018
    [15]
    雷望红. 中国城乡母职形象何以分化−“教育家庭化”中的城市“虎妈”与农村“猫妈”[J]. 探索与争鸣,2020(10):148-156. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2229.2020.10.021
    [16]
    张善根. 寻求儿童监护的家国共治方案[J]. 探索与争鸣,2021(5):23-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2229.2021.05.007
    [17]
    陈恩伦. 从受教育权到学习权:终身学习社会的权利转型[J]. 国家教育行政学院学报,2022(1):13-19. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4038.2022.01.002
    [18]
    林建军. 家庭教育法的调整对象及其逻辑起点[J]. 河北法学,2021,39(5):96-106. doi: 10.16494/j.cnki.1002-3933.2021.05.007
    [19]
    贺电. 平衡法理论回应社会主要矛盾变化的新思考[J]. 社会科学战线,2018(12):177-190,2.
    [20]
    刘晓巍,赵菲. 从父母权利到教育能力:家庭教育立法之基[J]. 中国教育学刊,2021(8):20-25.
    [21]
    杨乐. 家庭教育立法中国家义务的法律规制及实现路径−基于未成年人受教育权保障视角[J]. 人文杂志,2021(2):122-128. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0447-662X.2021.02.014
    [22]
    姚伊. 家庭教育权之法理探微[J]. 社会科学动态,2018(3):73-82.
    [23]
    王广聪. 论最有利于未成年人原则的司法适用[J]. 政治与法律,2022(3):134-147. doi: 10.15984/j.cnki.1005-9512.2022.03.010
    [24]
    万方. 论监护人的家庭教育责任[J]. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版),2021(6):154-162. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9142.2021.06.017
    [25]
    叶强. 论家庭教育的政府责任及其立法规范[J]. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报,2020,19(01):32-38. doi: 10.19503/j.cnki.1671-6124.2020.01.005
    [26]
    余雅风,姚真. 论家庭教育立法的宗旨及规范重点−基于国外立法的思考[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2021(3):25-33.
    [27]
    李曼. 家庭教育地方立法的实践探索与理性思考[J]. 北京社会科学,2021(5):84-91. doi: 10.13262/j.bjsshkxy.bjshkx.210509
    [28]
    柳经纬. 论标准对法律的支撑作用[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020(6):152-162. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-0460.2020.06.015
    [29]
    柳经纬. 论标准对法律发挥作用的规范基础[J]. 行政法学研究,2021(1):103-114.
    [30]
    赵鑫. 迈向“开放性规制”:规制标准的反思与重构−《规制:法律形式与经济学理论》述论[J]. 政法论坛,2021,39(3):176-183. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0208.2021.03.017
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (334) PDF downloads(41) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return