The Formation Mechanism of the Open Government Data Value Co-destruction: An Explanation from the Process-tracking Method

TANG Zhi-wei; HAN Xiao

doi:10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022040110

Volume 38 Issue 5

Oct. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2022 > 38(5): 604-612

TANG Zhi-wei, HAN Xiao. The Formation Mechanism of the Open Government Data Value Co-destruction: An Explanation from the Process-tracking Method[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 604-612. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022040110

Citation:

TANG Zhi-wei, HAN Xiao. The Formation Mechanism of the Open Government Data Value Co-destruction: An Explanation from the Process-tracking Method[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 604-612. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022040110

Citation:

PDF( 1050 KB)

The Formation Mechanism of the Open Government Data Value Co-destruction: An Explanation from the Process-tracking Method

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022040110

School of Public Affairs and Administration, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China

Received Date: 2022-04-30
Available Online: 2022-10-10
Publish Date: 2022-10-25

Abstract

Abstract

Government data open is regarded as the key factor to creative public value. All governments are are carrying out data opening, however, the practice of government data opening does not produce the value that is generally expected, and value co-destruction occurs frequently. In order to identify the causal mechanism, this paper uses the process-tracking method to analyze the case. It is found that the value co-destruction of government data open in China is caused by two mechanisms: Inadequate resources and misconduct. Among them, the lack of data utilization ability and opportunism behavior are the most important conditions for the occurrence of value co-destruction. The lack of data governance right and the shortage of data platform are the necessary condition. Different from now, this paper finds that the culture of avoiding responsibility is related to the co-destruction, but its negative impact is not as great as claimed; Users’ lack of attention to participate is not a necessary. The government needs to bring the perspective back to the interior and strengthen the attraction and pertinence of projects.
- open government data,
- value co-destruction,
- mechanism,
- process-tracking method

FullText(HTML)

References(27)

References

[1]	徐慧娜,郑磊 & PARDO T. 国外政府数据开放研究综述:公共管理的视角[J]. 电子政务,2013(6):2-7.
[2]	韩啸,吴金鹏. 政府数据开放水平的驱动因素:基于跨国面板数据研究[J]. 电子政务,2020(6):98-106.
[3]	付熙雯,郑磊. 开放政府数据的价值:研究进展与展望[J]. 图书情报工作,2020,64(9):122-132.
[4]	张会平. 面向公共价值创造的城市公共数据治理创新[J]. 行政论坛,2020,27(1):130-136. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-460X.2020.01.019
[5]	PAYNE A F. Managing the co-creation of value [J]. Journal of the Academy Marketing Science, 2008, 36(1):83-96. doi: 10.1007/s11747-007-0070-0
[6]	武文珍,陈启杰. 价值共创理论形成路径探析与未来研究展望[J]. 外国经济与管理,2012,34(6):66-74.
[7]	VARGO S L & LUSCH R F. Institutions and axioms:an extension and update of service-dominant logic [J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2016, 44(1):5-23. doi: 10.1007/s11747-015-0456-3
[8]	李朝辉,卜庆娟,许倩倩,等. 价值总是被共同创造吗?−价值共同破坏研究综述与展望[J]. 财经论丛,2019(5):94-103.
[9]	王学军. 价值共创:公共服务合作生产的新趋势[J]. 上海行政学院学报,2020,21(1):23-32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3176.2020.01.003
[10]	YIN J L,QIAN L X & SHEN J J. From value co-creation to value co-destruction? The case of dockless bike sharing in China [J]. Transportation Research Part D, 2019, 71(1):169-185.
[11]	SMITH M A. The value co-destruction process:a customer resource perspective [J]. European of Journal Marketing, 2013, 47(11):1889-1909.
[12]	朱春艳,黄晓伟,马会端. “自主的技术”与“建构的技术”−雅克·埃吕尔与托马斯·休斯的技术系统观比较[J]. 自然辩证法研究,2012,28(10):31-35.
[13]	徐慧娜,郑磊. 面向用户利用的开放政府数据平台:纽约与上海比较研究[J]. 电子政务,2015(7):37-45.
[14]	鲍静,张勇进,董占广. 我国政府数据开放管理若干基本问题研究[J]. 行政论坛,2017,24(1):25-32.
[15]	樊博. 推进开放政府数据:提升政府部门大数据能力[J]. 学海,2018(2):5-10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9790.2018.02.001
[16]	赵需要,侯晓丽,樊振佳,等. 政府开放数据生态链的形成机理与培育策略[J]. 情报理论与实践,2021,44(6):7-17.
[17]	张长东. 社会科学中的因果机制:微观基础和过程追踪[J]. 公共管理评论,2018(1):10-21.
[18]	倪星,王锐. 从邀功到避责:基层政府官员行为变化研究[J]. 政治学研究,2017(2):42-52.
[19]	JANSSEN M,CHARALABIDIS Y & ZUIDERWIJK A. Benefits,adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government [J]. Information Systems Management, 2012, 29(4):258-268. doi: 10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
[20]	陈家建,赵阳. “低治理权”与基层购买公共服务困境研究[J]. 社会学研究,2019,34(1):132-157.
[21]	孟显印,杨超. 我国开放政府数据应用开发的现状与问题[J]. 情报杂志,2020,39(3):163-172.
[22]	郑磊. 开放政府数据的价值创造机理:生态系统的视角[J]. 电子政务,2015(7):2-7.
[23]	ATTARD J,ORLANDI F,SCERRI S,et al. A systematic review of open government data initiatives [J]. Government Information Quarterly, 2015, 32(4):399-418. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.006
[24]	黄如花,赖彤. 数据生命周期视角下我国政府数据开放的障碍研究[J]. 情报理论与实践,2018,41(2):7-13.
[25]	张涛. 论大数据警务及其法律控制[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020,36(3):69-77. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2689.2020.03.010
[26]	OSBORNE S,RADNOR Z & STROKOSCH K. Co-production and the Co-creation of value in public services: a suitable case for treatment? [J]. Public Management Review, 2016, 18(5):639-653. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927
[27]	赵玉攀. 国内开放政府数据研究的系统评述[J]. 现代情报,2018,38(2):164-171.