Agnes Heller’s Thoughts on the Universal Development of History

ZHANG Ting

doi:10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022040106

Volume 38 Issue 6

Dec. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2022 > 38(6): 631-638

ZHANG Ting. Agnes Heller’s Thoughts on the Universal Development of History[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 631-638. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022040106

Citation:

ZHANG Ting. Agnes Heller’s Thoughts on the Universal Development of History[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 631-638. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022040106

Citation:

PDF( 838 KB)

Agnes Heller’s Thoughts on the Universal Development of History

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022040106

ZHANG Ting

School of Marxism Studies, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

Received Date: 2022-04-29
Available Online: 2022-11-24
Publish Date: 2022-12-05

Abstract

Abstract

The concept of universal development of history is a common topic of all historical philosophy. In explaining the ontological thought of historical development, Heller proposed that historical development was closely related to historical laws and historical progress was emphasized as the development direction. Once people realize that history develops according to a certain law, the interpretation of history with historical philosophy would play a role of standardization, restriction and enlightenment, enabling people to rise from a state of freedom to a state of self-action. Universal development is a regular development, and historical philosophy centers on the capitalized History. Given that History is a holistic history, the development of history with regularity is also a holistic process.
- Agnes Heller,
- universal development of history,
- philosophy of history

FullText(HTML)

References(12)

References

[1]	阿格妮丝·赫勒. 历史理论[M]. 李西祥, 译. 黑龙江: 黑龙江大学出版社, 2015.
[2]	李西祥. 大写历史的辩证法——赫勒历史理论的辩证法解读及批判[J]. 学术交流, 2016（5）: 5-11.
[3]	马克思恩格斯选集（第1卷）[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2012.
[4]	马克思恩格斯选集（第3卷）[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2012.
[5]	赵海峰, 王晓琼. 人和历史的后现代处境——论赫勒《碎片化的历史哲学》中的隐喻及意义[J]. 苏州大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2020, 41（6）: 1-9, 199.
[6]	许恒兵. 阿格妮丝·赫勒历史哲学批判及后现代转向论析[J]. 理论月刊, 2019（4）: 26-33.
[7]	马克思恩格斯选集（第2卷）[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2012.
[8]	孔明安. 偶然性的人与道德普遍性的重构——评赫勒的《一般伦理学》 [J]. 哲学动态, 2017（1）: 76-82
[9]	黑格尔全集（第27卷）第I分册《世界史哲学讲演录（1822—1823）》[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2014.
[10]	埃米尔·涂尔干. 社会分工[M]. 渠敬东, 译. 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2017.
[11]	维尔弗雷多·帕累托. 精英的兴衰[M]. 刘北成, 译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2003.
[12]	包大为. 《共产党宣言》对政治概念的解构和重构[J]. 北京科技大学学报（社会科学版）, 2019, 35（6）: 80-87