Research on the Discretion on Irreparable Harm
-
摘要: 行为保全标准中“难以弥补的损害”要件存在内涵解释模糊、实践缺乏系统性指引等问题。为给予实践更加清晰、明确的指引，应从理论上深入分析和系统研究。通过本土解析和比较研究可以认为“难以弥补的损害”是指财产保全和终局裁判均不能弥补的损害。在裁量路径上，应结合难以弥补的损害的性质，将其类型化为损害赔偿无法弥补和赔偿数额难以计算两种类型。Abstract: The irreparable harm is the core of the standard of conduct preservation and in the problem of blurs theory and practice.It's necessary to discuss the concept and discretion about it.Based on the analysis on the current experience in China and comparative studies,the classic and current theories consider the irreparable harm is the harm that cannot be repaired with substantive remedies and final specific remedies.The method of evaluating the harm could be thinking about if there is enough damage and if the damage is evaluable.
-
Key words:
- irreparable harm /
- conduct preservation /
- preliminary injunction /
- damage
期刊类型引用(5)
1. 张弛，刘海安. 人格权保护禁令中“难以弥补的损害”的类型化认定. 浙江理工大学学报(社会科学版). 2023(01): 111-118 . 
百度学术2. 赵志超. 人格权禁令程序：实践冷遇与困境纾解. 东岳论丛. 2023(08): 171-178 . 百度学术3. 李晓秋，李雪倩. 电商平台专利侵权诉讼中行为保全适用新诠. 电子知识产权. 2023(10): 4-14 . 百度学术4. 曹志勋. 民事诉讼中强制性诉前鉴定的反思与重构. 证据科学. 2022(02): 133-144 . 百度学术5. 王英州. 论电子商务领域知识产权保护的司法介入. 法律适用. 2021(04): 53-61 . 百度学术其他类型引用(75)
-
百度学术
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 400
- HTML全文浏览量: 113
- PDF下载量: 49
- 被引次数: 80
下载:
