Commonality and Individuality: The Various Possibilities of a Lawyer's Thinking

CHEN Zi-pan

Volume 35 Issue 1

May 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2019 > 35(1): 89-97

JIN Huai-mei. A Confucian Reading of Humanistic Thoughts in J.M.Coetzee's Works[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(1): 44-49.

Citation:

CHEN Zi-pan. Commonality and Individuality: The Various Possibilities of a Lawyer's Thinking[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(1): 89-97.

JIN Huai-mei. A Confucian Reading of Humanistic Thoughts in J.M.Coetzee's Works[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(1): 44-49.

Citation:

PDF( 442 KB)

Commonality and Individuality: The Various Possibilities of a Lawyer's Thinking

CHEN Zi-pan

School of Humanities, China University of Political Science and Law Beijing 100088, China

Received Date: 2018-10-25
Available Online: 2021-05-24

Abstract

Abstract

Thinking is a unique mental activity.The thinking of a lawyer includes the commonality and the personality of thinking,which stems from the professional character and essential attributes of a lawyer.The community of lawyers has a commonality in thinking because of professional skills and needs.However,the common thinking of a lawyer is not always effective in dealing with legal cases.The defects of common thinking leave room for the thinking personality of a lawyer which indicates that he or she will unconsciously include his or her own values when dealing with legal issues.The commonality and individuality of a lawyer is a dialectical unit.The benign interaction between the two is not easy, which may lead to wrong thinking, and must be corrected.Lawyerly thinking has significance in safeguarding the community's right to speak and promote professional specialization.However,a lawyer should avoid falling into the stereotype of thinking only in the benign interaction of commonality and the individuality of thinking.Constituting the thinking of a lawyer is an important path to deepening the construction of such thought.
- lawyer's thinking,
- commonality of thinking,
- individuality of thinking,
- wrong thinking,
- benign interaction

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	YU Cheng-wen. Effectively Promote the Spirit of Xi Jinping’s Important Reply to the Senior Professors of USTB to Take Root[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(3): 233-236. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050092
[2]	ZHU Guang-ya, JIANG Jun-ren. From the Spread of Western Learning to the Revival of Confucianism: The Problem of Confucianism Modernization in Horizon of Sinicization of Marxism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(2): 89-96.
[3]	YANG Zi. New Trends in the Study of Corpus-based Pragmatics: A Review of Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(1): 26-29.
[5]	ZHAO Ji-ning. On the Value of the Summaries in the Seven Versions of Si Ku Quan Shu—With the Summaries of Zhou Yi in Si Ku Quan Shu of Wen Su Ge as Examples[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(4): 78-82.
[6]	QIAN Duo-xiu, LUO Yuan. Corpus-based Comparative Study of Moves in the Abstracts of Research Papers[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(2): 12-17.
[7]	WANG Guang. Liang Shuming's Interpretation of Western Political Conceptions[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(4): 169-172.
[8]	YANG Fan. Analysis on Yan Yuan's View of Righteousness and Benefit[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 150-152.
[9]	SUN Ya. A Prototype-Theory-Based Approach to Metonymy[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 18-23.
[10]	LIU Xiao-yu, LIN Zhi-sen. On Marcuse's Humane World of Technology[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(2): 169-172.
[11]	ZUO Yu-he. Rising of the “Excluding Confucius” Trend of Thought in Late Qing Dynasty[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(1): 124-128.
[12]	LIANG Feng. Study on the Right Theory of Hayek[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(2): 155-159,144.
[13]	CHEN Hang-ping. Rethinking “Retrial Litigation”: From the Perspective of Solving the Problem of “Difficulty of Complaints”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(2): 56-63.
[14]	DONG Xi-ping. Inability of Deities in “Dream of the Red Chamber”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(4): 86-94.
[15]	PANG Xia-lan, LIU Xiang-ying. Analysis on “Stability Overwhelming the Wholeness”——A Perspective of Social Conflict Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(3): 14-16.