Commonality and Individuality: The Various Possibilities of a Lawyer's Thinking

CHEN Zi-pan

Volume 35 Issue 1

May 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2019 > 35(1): 89-97

CHEN Zi-pan. Commonality and Individuality: The Various Possibilities of a Lawyer's Thinking[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(1): 89-97.

Citation:

CHEN Zi-pan. Commonality and Individuality: The Various Possibilities of a Lawyer's Thinking[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(1): 89-97.

Citation:

PDF( 442 KB)

Commonality and Individuality: The Various Possibilities of a Lawyer's Thinking

CHEN Zi-pan

School of Humanities, China University of Political Science and Law Beijing 100088, China

Received Date: 2018-10-25
Available Online: 2021-05-24

Abstract

Abstract

Thinking is a unique mental activity.The thinking of a lawyer includes the commonality and the personality of thinking,which stems from the professional character and essential attributes of a lawyer.The community of lawyers has a commonality in thinking because of professional skills and needs.However,the common thinking of a lawyer is not always effective in dealing with legal cases.The defects of common thinking leave room for the thinking personality of a lawyer which indicates that he or she will unconsciously include his or her own values when dealing with legal issues.The commonality and individuality of a lawyer is a dialectical unit.The benign interaction between the two is not easy, which may lead to wrong thinking, and must be corrected.Lawyerly thinking has significance in safeguarding the community's right to speak and promote professional specialization.However,a lawyer should avoid falling into the stereotype of thinking only in the benign interaction of commonality and the individuality of thinking.Constituting the thinking of a lawyer is an important path to deepening the construction of such thought.
- lawyer's thinking,
- commonality of thinking,
- individuality of thinking,
- wrong thinking,
- benign interaction

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	XIE Yongjiang, YANG Yongxing, LIU Tao. Legal Risk Regulation of Personalized Recommendation Algorithms[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(1): 77-85. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022110031
[2]	ZHANG Yao-jie. The Good Cooperation between Hu Shi and Cai Yuanpei[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(1): 58-67.
[3]	YUAN Li. Tea and Coffee: The Comparison of the Chinese-Western Way of Thinking[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(1): 48-55.
[4]	ZHANG Chao. On the Background of Cultural Communication between China and the West in the Rise of the Old Summer Palace[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(6): 37-43.
[5]	ZHANG Xiao-xi. A Debate: the Publicity of Foucault Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(3): 76-80.
[6]	DENG Shuang-lin. On Construction of Systematic Thinking in the University Art Education——A Perspective of Appreciation of Film Music[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(3): 150-154.
[7]	WANG Wei-dong. From “Self” to “Individual”: Lu Xun's Traditional Model of Thinking in the Acceptance of German Individualism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(3): 1-9.
[8]	ZHANG Lin-jiang. New Thinking of Chinese Urbanization[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(3): 129-133.
[9]	ZHANG Yi. Analysis of International Law on the Legal Status of the Ryukyu Islands——New Methods for the Settlement of the Disputes on the East China Sea[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 70-74.
[10]	CHU Yu. Reflection on the Thinking Mode Hindering the Improvement of Science and Technology in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(4): 150-153.
[11]	LONG Yao, LI Xue-yan. Groping on the Examination System under the Brand Strategy on Education[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(3): 140-143,148.
[12]	SONG Lin, LIU Wen-xia. Creative Thinking in Scientific Discovery[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(3): 153-157.
[14]	LU Qiu-fang, XING Yong-fu. Cultivation of Individuality and Education for Quality[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(2): 58-61.
[15]	CUI Xiao-wen. The Function of Intuitive Thinking in Innovation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(4): 61-63,72.