TIAN Gui-sen, SUN Jian-min. Theories and Methodologies of Language Variation Studies[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(3): 99-103.
Citation: TIAN Gui-sen, SUN Jian-min. Theories and Methodologies of Language Variation Studies[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(3): 99-103.

Theories and Methodologies of Language Variation Studies

  • Received Date: 2009-06-21
    Available Online: 2021-06-28
  • This paper begins with a brief reviewof major developments of language variation studies and its significance in linguis-tics.It then addresses three issues concerning theoretical constructs of language variation studies, namely, the lawful co-variation of social variations and language variations, the structure and system of language as orderly heterogeneity, and social functions of the language variation.Finally, the paper discusses issues of the research methodology in variation studies.

     

  • Relative Articles

    [1]CHANG Chenguang, LI Meizi. A Systemic Functional Linguistic Re-interpretation of Modality Types[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(4): 438-445. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023030128
    [2]HUANG Guo-wen. What Is Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(1): 73-89. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100090
    [3]XIANG Da-jun. On the Symbiotic Thinking in Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 525-532. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050096
    [4]HU Zhuang-lin. On the Integration of Linguistic Research[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(1): 12-16.
    [5]WEI Rong, Stephen Cowley. New Model of Ecolinguistics: Radical Ecolinguistics—An Interview with Professor Stephen Cowley[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(1): 8-12.
    [7]HE Wei, WEI Rong. Ecolinguistic Studies in the International Context[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(2): 1-5.
    [8]HU An-qi, WANG Qing-xia. An Exploration of the Foundation of Basil Bernstein’s Sociology of Language and Its Theoretical Significance[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(5): 14-19.
    [9]GAO Sheng-wen. Research on the Construction of Special Columns of Universities'Journals of Humanities and Social Sciences from the Perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics—With the “Functional Linguistics Studies” of Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing (Social Sciences Edition) as an Example[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(6): 45-51.
    [10]LIANG Hong-yan, ZENG Lei. Translation Studies of Projection: A Functional Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(4): 12-16,22.
    [11]LI Xue-ning, FAN Xin-ying. Research on the Know ledge Representation Method of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(3): 26-30.
    [13]LI Zhan-fang, DAN Hui-fang. Language Variation Studies: Methodology and Application[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(4): 26-29.
    [14]GONG Zhang-hua. Genre Studies in Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 6-12.
    [15]CHANG Chen-guang, CHEN Yu-min. Systemic Functional Studies of Register[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 1-5.
    [16]XU Sheng-huan. The Philosophy of Mind and the Innovation of Cognitive Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(1): 84-88.
    [17]WANG Mei. A Survey of Apology Studies Abroad[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(2): 107-112.
    [18]HU Zhuang-lin. The Relation of Systemic Functional Linguistics to Sociolinguistics in Terms of Its Origin and Development[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(2): 92-97.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-062025-072025-080255075100
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 8.1 %FULLTEXT: 8.1 %META: 86.4 %META: 86.4 %PDF: 5.6 %PDF: 5.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.7 %其他: 8.7 %其他: 0.2 %其他: 0.2 %Central District: 0.3 %Central District: 0.3 %China: 0.1 %China: 0.1 %Cordova: 0.1 %Cordova: 0.1 %Hanoi: 0.1 %Hanoi: 0.1 %Seattle: 0.4 %Seattle: 0.4 %Tanjong Malim: 0.2 %Tanjong Malim: 0.2 %上海: 0.5 %上海: 0.5 %东莞: 0.1 %东莞: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %九江: 0.2 %九江: 0.2 %保定: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %八打灵再也: 1.0 %八打灵再也: 1.0 %北京: 1.8 %北京: 1.8 %十堰: 0.8 %十堰: 0.8 %华盛顿州: 0.3 %华盛顿州: 0.3 %南京: 0.9 %南京: 0.9 %南昌: 0.4 %南昌: 0.4 %南通: 0.5 %南通: 0.5 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %吉安: 0.1 %吉安: 0.1 %吉隆坡: 1.1 %吉隆坡: 1.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.6 %嘉兴: 0.6 %天津: 2.6 %天津: 2.6 %太原: 0.1 %太原: 0.1 %宜春: 0.1 %宜春: 0.1 %宣城: 1.3 %宣城: 1.3 %常州: 0.9 %常州: 0.9 %平顶山: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %广州: 0.4 %广州: 0.4 %张家口: 0.4 %张家口: 0.4 %德阳: 0.3 %德阳: 0.3 %意法半: 0.2 %意法半: 0.2 %成都: 0.5 %成都: 0.5 %扬州: 3.2 %扬州: 3.2 %新加坡: 0.2 %新加坡: 0.2 %新奥尔良: 0.2 %新奥尔良: 0.2 %新山: 0.1 %新山: 0.1 %无锡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.2 %昆明: 0.3 %昆明: 0.3 %景德镇: 0.1 %景德镇: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 2.1 %杭州: 2.1 %格兰特县: 0.3 %格兰特县: 0.3 %武汉: 0.6 %武汉: 0.6 %沈阳: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.2 %淄博: 0.6 %淄博: 0.6 %深圳: 0.3 %深圳: 0.3 %温州: 2.6 %温州: 2.6 %湖州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.4 %湘潭: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %湛江: 0.2 %湛江: 0.2 %漯河: 9.1 %漯河: 9.1 %珠海: 0.3 %珠海: 0.3 %盐城: 0.2 %盐城: 0.2 %石家庄: 1.8 %石家庄: 1.8 %芒廷维尤: 10.4 %芒廷维尤: 10.4 %芝加哥: 0.9 %芝加哥: 0.9 %衡水: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.8 %衡阳: 0.8 %襄阳: 0.3 %襄阳: 0.3 %西宁: 32.6 %西宁: 32.6 %西安: 0.3 %西安: 0.3 %西雅图: 0.3 %西雅图: 0.3 %赛城: 0.2 %赛城: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.6 %邯郸: 0.6 %郑州: 0.7 %郑州: 0.7 %长沙: 2.3 %长沙: 2.3 %雪兰莪: 0.1 %雪兰莪: 0.1 %雷德蒙德: 0.3 %雷德蒙德: 0.3 %青岛: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %马鞍山: 0.3 %马鞍山: 0.3 %黄冈: 0.3 %黄冈: 0.3 %其他其他Central DistrictChinaCordovaHanoiSeattleTanjong Malim上海东莞临汾九江保定八打灵再也北京十堰华盛顿州南京南昌南通合肥吉安吉隆坡呼和浩特哥伦布嘉兴天津太原宜春宣城常州平顶山广州张家口德阳意法半成都扬州新加坡新奥尔良新山无锡昆明景德镇朝阳杭州格兰特县武汉沈阳洛阳淄博深圳温州湖州湘潭湛江漯河珠海盐城石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥衡水衡阳襄阳西宁西安西雅图赛城邯郸郑州长沙雪兰莪雷德蒙德青岛马鞍山黄冈

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (993) PDF downloads(64) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return