Extensions of the Cardiff Grammar over the Sydney Grammar

HE Wei; PENG Yi

Volume 24 Issue 1

Jun. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2008 > 24(1): 108-116

HE Wei, PENG Yi. Extensions of the Cardiff Grammar over the Sydney Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 108-116.

Citation:

HE Wei, PENG Yi. Extensions of the Cardiff Grammar over the Sydney Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 108-116.

HE Wei, PENG Yi. Extensions of the Cardiff Grammar over the Sydney Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 108-116.

Citation:

HE Wei, PENG Yi. Extensions of the Cardiff Grammar over the Sydney Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 108-116.

PDF( 512 KB)

Extensions of the Cardiff Grammar over the Sydney Grammar

HE Wei,
PENG Yi

School of Foreign Studies University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

Received Date: 2008-01-12
Available Online: 2021-06-28

Abstract

Abstract

There are certain differences between the Sydney Grammar and the Cardiff Grammar which belong to Systemic Functional Linguistics.This paper aims to discuss extensions of the Cardiff Grammar over the Sydney Grammar in four respects concerning functional syntax and semantics.Through the comparison between the two models, the study indicates that the main extensions are reflected in the following four respects:(1) that the Cardiff Grammar bases the categorization of the "Main Verb Extension" mainly on its function, and that it recognizes more expounding items of the element than the Sydney Grammar; (2) that the Cardiff Grammar establishes different criteria from the Sydney Grammar with reference to the differentiation of different groups; (3) that the Cardiff Grammar bases the differentiation of different types of Auxiliaries on their distinct meaning;and (4) that the Cardiff Grammar semanticizes the Mood system network originating from the Sydney Grammar.
- the Cardiff Grammar,
- the Sydney Grammar,
- functional syntax,
- semantics

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	LI Xuening, HU Ziwei. Research on the Grammatical Negation System in English Sentiment Analysis: The Cardiff Grammar Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(5): 74-82. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023100061
[2]	XIANG Da-jun. Halliday on the Cardiff Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(1): 33-39.
[3]	LIU Yan. Study of Readability ofAlice's Adventures in Wonderland and Its Eight Adaptations: A Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspective of Reference[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(3): 20-29.
[4]	XIANG Da-jun. Towards Cardiff Grammar’s View of Language as Program[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(3): 42-48,69.
[5]	YI Yong. A Systemic Functional Syntactic Analysis of the “N+to+V”Construction in English[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(1): 44-49.
[6]	LI Zhan-zi. A Functional Syntactic Approach to Cultural Stereotypes[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(4): 1-6.
[7]	HE Wei, YANG Nan. A Study of Chinese “Verb-complement Constructions” from the Perspective of the Cardiff Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(1): 1-13.
[8]	CHEN Yong. Try to Discuss the Dynamic Changes of Semantics under the Category of Language——Take Number-Categories in Chinese and English for Examples[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(3): 17-22,26.
[9]	DENG Ren-hua, LIANG Su-lian. The Syntactico-semantic Analysis of English Existential Clauses in the Sydney Grammar and the Cardiff Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(3): 1-9.
[10]	HE Wei, SU Miao. A Study of the Criterion for Distinguishing Simple from Complex Sentences in Modern Mandarin Chinese within the Framework of the Cardiff Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(1): 1-11.
[11]	ZHANG Jing-yuan, NI Meng-ning. A Study of Chinese Prepositional Group from the Perspective of the Cardiff Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(1): 12-22.
[12]	GAO Sheng-wen, YAN Zhen-hua. A Study of Discontinuity within the Framework of the Cardiff Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(1): 23-31.
[13]	ZHANG Jing-yuan, ZHANG Yi. The Tentative Analysis of “YOU”-comparative Sentence from the Perspective of Cardiff Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(1): 34-40.
[14]	SU Hang, LIU Cheng-yu. A Comparative Study of Transitivity between Sydney Grammar and Cardiff Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(1): 41-47.
[15]	HUANG Guo-wen. A Systemic Functional Syntactic Analysis of the “V+to+V” Construction in English[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(1): 8-13.
[16]	HE Wei, MA Rui-zhi. Overview of the Transitivity System within the Cardiff Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(1): 98-105,119.
[17]	LI Man-liang. Comparison of Descriptions of English Nominal Groups Between the Sydney Grammar and the Cardiff Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(1): 112-119.
[18]	WANG Hong-yang. The Relationships between the Cardiff Grammar and Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 117-121,134.
[19]	HUANG Guo-wen. The Cardiff Grammar: a Model in Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 93-100.
[20]	LIAO Chu-yan. Notes on the Cardiff Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 101-107.