A Quantitative Study of the Training Quality of Doctoral Students in Current China

QU Shao-wei; LI Ting-zhou

Volume 27 Issue 4

Jun. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2011 > 27(4): 68-71

TANG De-long. Essence and Reality Appealing of Limited Government[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 61-65.

Citation:

QU Shao-wei, LI Ting-zhou. A Quantitative Study of the Training Quality of Doctoral Students in Current China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(4): 68-71.

TANG De-long. Essence and Reality Appealing of Limited Government[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 61-65.

Citation:

PDF( 238 KB)

A Quantitative Study of the Training Quality of Doctoral Students in Current China

Institute of Education Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

Received Date: 2011-11-20
Available Online: 2021-06-26

Abstract

Abstract

There exist kinds of views and visions in evaluation of training quality of doctoral students.This article assesses China's PhD graduate' students training objectives, training modes and training results, based on the evaluation of doctoral administrators, doctoral supervisors and doctoral students.The purpose of the article is to diagnose the achievements and shortages of China's PhD students, training and to give a scientific basis of evolutions and improvements of PhD students' training modes.
- doctoral students,
- training quality,
- evaluation

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	XI Dongmei, WANG Jieya. Theoretical Origin and Practical Approach of the Connotation of Marxist People’s Subjectivity[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(3): 119-128. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024090136
[2]	DONG Juan, WU Yulin. Lenin’s Critique of Russian Anarchist Thought and Its Realistic Enlightenment[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(3): 129-136. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024080099
[3]	SU Yun-ting. Behind the Epidemic of NCP: A Realist Review of Global Governance[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(2): 60-67.
[4]	WANG Fu-fang. Embodied Realism: Theoretical Controversies and Challenges[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(4): 20-25.
[5]	YANG Guang. The Combination of Rights: The Discussion on the Pre-emptive Right in Limited Liability Company[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(2): 86-93.
[6]	LIANG Feng. The Crisis of Contemporary Individualism and the Breakthrough of Classic Liberalism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(4): 80-84,112.
[7]	SHI Li-rong, LIU Yu. The Limited Intervention and Reasonable Extension of the Supervisory Authority of Government by Organizational Boundary[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(3): 108-112.
[8]	LI Tong-yu. Argument on the Finite or Infinite of the Universe——The Debate between the Science and Philosophy in 1980s[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(3): 55-62.
[9]	LI Tong-yu. On Debate:the Material Is Limited or Unlimited——The Second of Series Papers on Debate between Science and Philosophy in the 1980's[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(1): 62-69,97.
[10]	ZHANG Ti-kun, SONG Ying-hui. The Misreading and Methodology Criticism of “Chinese Liberalism Literature”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(2): 44-49.
[11]	ZHANG Ti-kun. Discourse Construction and Theory Interpretation of Chinese Liberalism Literature——And Criticism of Some Extensive Liberalism Tendencies[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(2): 24-29.
[12]	GAO Yong-zhou. People Combination in Limited Liability Corporation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(4): 59-64.
[13]	PANG Jin-you. Analysis of the Weak Government Theory of Modern Western Liberalism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(4): 32-37.
[14]	LIANG Feng. The Internal Crisis of Liberalism and Hayek[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(3): 149-155,161.
[15]	ZHANG Qi-qiang. On Buchanan's Theories of Limited Government[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(1): 51-54.
[16]	CHEN Yu-wu. Rethinking Yan Fu's Charactericistics of Liberalists[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(4): 125-130.
[17]	LI Yi. On the Critical Legal Studies of International Law[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(2): 52-54.
[18]	XIAO Yong-bing. On the Selection of the Patterns of Board's Restrictionover Joint-stock Company of Limited Liability[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(3): 42-46.
[19]	FENG Ying. The Explanation of YAN Fu's Definition about Liberty[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(4): 57-60.
[20]	ZHANG Kang-zhi. The Moral Appeals in Administration Reform[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 1-4,16.