Gapping in Mandarin Chinese: A Language Information Structure Perspective

WANG Zhu; ZHANG Tian-wei

Volume 35 Issue 4

May 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2019 > 35(4): 23-32

WANG Zhu, ZHANG Tian-wei. Gapping in Mandarin Chinese: A Language Information Structure Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(4): 23-32.

Citation:

WANG Zhu, ZHANG Tian-wei. Gapping in Mandarin Chinese: A Language Information Structure Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(4): 23-32.

Citation:

PDF( 673 KB)

Gapping in Mandarin Chinese: A Language Information Structure Perspective

The National Research Centre for Foreign Language Education, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing 100089, China

Received Date: 2019-04-28
Available Online: 2021-05-24

Abstract

Abstract

Based on Language Information Structure Theory and a contrast test of the acceptability of gapping data,this paper identifies that gapping exists in Mandarin Chinese.The linguistic context helps to improve and understand its acceptability.Mandarin Chinese gapping is a typical Topic-Comment Structure,and it transmits contrastive information by means of contrastive topic and contrastive focus.The roles of focus and the strength of contrastive information are the main factors affecting gapping's acceptability.Quantifiers,demonstratives and imperative mood can increase the acceptability by strengthening contrastive information.Adverbs,negators and effect-cause complex sentences can decrease the acceptability by influencing the roles of focus.
- gapping,
- Language Information Structure,
- Topic-Comment Structure,
- contrastive topic,
- contrastive focus

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	SONG Ju-lei. A Contrastive Study of Chinese Reduplicatives and Their Translation by Analyzing Two English Versions: A Case Study of The Journey to the West[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 543-551. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022060065
[2]	SONG Ping, JIN Zhi-ru. A Contrastive Ecological Discourse Analysis of English Translations of Chinese Public Signs on Environmental Protection[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(6): 599-605.
[3]	ZHAO Hong-wei, HE Wei. Review of Research on English and Chinese Causatives[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(1): 16-23.
[4]	SONG Ju-lei. A Contrastive Study of Word-formation in Noun Reduplication between Chinese and English[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(5): 1-8.
[5]	HE Wei, LIU Jia-huan. A Contrastive Study of the Logico-semantic Relations and Their Representations between English and Chinese Clauses[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(2): 1-17.
[6]	CHEN Hong, DENG Ren-hua. A Comparative Analysis of Shijun Wei's New Hall in Yongzhou and Its English Version from the Perspective of Topic Chain[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(2): 47-52.
[7]	YANG Cai-ying, LU Xi-ying. A Contrastive Study of English and Chinese Comment Adjuncts with Shuo and Speaking[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(1): 25-32.
[8]	YU Hui, YU Ting-ting. A Study on the Function of Grammatical Metaphor in Knowledge Construction in Academic Discourse across Different Disciplines[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(2): 1-7.
[9]	ZHONG Wei, HE Wei. Textual Metafunction of Nonfinite Clauses in Chinese[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(6): 25-30.
[10]	WANG Lei, LI Tao. A Discourse-based Study of the Topics in the Ba-construction[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(3): 26-31.
[11]	HE Zi-ran. The Conversion of Conceptual Structures in Pragmatics-oriented C-E Translation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(6): 1-6.
[12]	XIE Shu-nuan. Comparative Study of Grammatical Metaphor in Chinese and Foreign Academic Discourses[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(1): 16-20.
[13]	WANG Xiao-wei. The Semantic Constraints and Textual Function of Clause-initial Temporal Adjuncts in English[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(4): 26-34.
[14]	ZHANG Chun-yan. A Systemic Functional Analysis of the “Preposition + Clause” Structure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(1): 48-55.
[15]	ZHANG Man. Differences in Using “I” and “We” in Book Reviews[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(2): 29-32.
[16]	CHEN Yang. The Relationship between Elements of Clause Structure and Participant Roles[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(1): 33-38.
[17]	LI Jie-yuan. Personal Pronouns as Means of Relation-Building in Advertising Discourse: An English-Chinese Contrastive Analysis[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(2): 104-108.
[18]	QI Xi. On English Causative Constructions and “Projection”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(1): 106-111.