British Attitude Towards the Shantung Question in the Washington Conference

ZHANG Bei-gen

Volume 25 Issue 3

Jun. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2009 > 25(3): 122-127

ZHANG Bei-gen. British Attitude Towards the Shantung Question in the Washington Conference[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(3): 122-127.

Citation:

ZHANG Bei-gen. British Attitude Towards the Shantung Question in the Washington Conference[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(3): 122-127.

Citation:

PDF( 276 KB)

British Attitude Towards the Shantung Question in the Washington Conference

ZHANG Bei-gen

School of Humanities and Social Sciences University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

Received Date: 2009-08-20
Available Online: 2021-06-28

Abstract

Abstract

British attitude towards the Shantung Question in the Washington Conference was different from that in the Paris Peace Conference, in which Britain played the role of Japan's accomplice in the settlement of the Shantung issue.Britain asked Japan to hand over the leased territory of Kiaochow and the Kiaochow-Tsinan railway to China, withdraw Japanese troops and police from the railway, internationalize the leased territory of Kiaochow, agree to redeem the railway with the gevernment bond.But she asked China to make a concession to Japan about the staff appointments of the railway.
- the Washington Conference,
- the Shantung Question,
- Britain

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	ZHAO Bing. Literature, Theory and Democratic Criticism in British Cultural Studies—Richard Hoggart: Anti-theoretical or Atheoretical?[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(2): 114-119.
[2]	YUN Chun-xi, XU Xi-qing. The Impact of Rural “Loose Organization” on Rural Governance in Transition Period——With Shandong Province as an Example[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(5): 89-94.
[3]	ZHANG Bei, LI Hui-ming. Studies of the Financing Mode for Municipal Solid Waste Treatment Facilities in China: Taking Britain for Example[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 99-104.
[4]	WANG Rong-xia. Britain's Decolonization in China at the Beginning of the North Expedition[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(2): 154-159.
[5]	WANG Rong-xia. Britain's Policy toward Japan and China on the Eve of the Washington Conference[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 108-111.
[6]	CHEN Hong-wei, LI Fang-hui. Howard Brenton: Shuttle through the Fragments of Historical Myth[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(1): 93-97.
[7]	GUO De-hong. Analysis of Management Mechanism of Undergraduate Curriculum in UK Universities[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 164-168.
[8]	ZHANG Bei-gen. Britain's Foreign Policy towards China after the First World War[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(1): 129-133.
[9]	GAO Cui. British Attitude Towards the Question of the Chinese Manchuria Railways 1909-1910[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(3): 128-133.
[10]	YANG Xiao-ming, JIN Long, ZHANG Yan. Survey on British National Student Satisfaction[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 145-148.
[11]	ZHANG Bei-gen. British and Japanese Attitude to the Question of the Consortium, the Loan to China and the Disbandment of Unnecessary Chinese Troops[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 128-134.
[12]	WANG Rong-xia. The Evolution of the British Foreign Policy toward China in the May 30 Movement[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(4): 124-128.
[13]	ZHANG Yan-ling, QU Xi-hua. Gift Exchange under Human Relationship in China Rural Areas——A Case Study of Dongjiacun in Shandong Province[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(1): 20-23.
[14]	ZHANG Bei-gen. Britain's Attitude of Increasing China's Tariff in the Washington Conference[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(2): 121-126.
[15]	WANG Li-qun. The British Image Portrayed in Recording of Traveling[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(1): 76-82.
[16]	ZHANG Bei-gen. Britain's Attitude Toward China on the Question of Tariff Revision Before the Washington Comference[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(2): 119-122.
[17]	ZHOU Xiang-bin. Investigation and Thoughts of British Qualificatin Education in Social Work[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(1): 1-6,51.
[18]	LIU Zuo-kui. On British Foreign Policy to France during Ruhr Crisis[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(1): 77-82.
[19]	WANG Rong-xia. On the British Policy toward China on the Eve of the Chinese Special Tariff Conference[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(3): 51-55,90.