Hu Sheng and Research Analysis on the Historiography Paradigm of the Communist Party of China

WANG Bing

Jun. 2021

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2018 > 34(5): 91-98

WANG Bing. Hu Sheng and Research Analysis on the Historiography Paradigm of the Communist Party of China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(5): 91-98.

Citation:

WANG Bing. Hu Sheng and Research Analysis on the Historiography Paradigm of the Communist Party of China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(5): 91-98.

Citation:

PDF( 401 KB)

Hu Sheng and Research Analysis on the Historiography Paradigm of the Communist Party of China

WANG Bing

1. College of Marxism, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241003, China;
2. College of Economics and Technology, Anhui Agriculture University, Hefei 230013, China

Received Date: 2018-06-25
Available Online: 2021-06-01

Abstract

Abstract

Since reform and opening up, an important reason which developed the research and its disciplinary construction of the history of CPC, is the importance attached to the research of discipline construction on the circles. In the study of the history of the party paradigm, Hu Sheng has applied the paradigm of the revolutionary history and perspectives and methods of the modernized therory, to interpret the process of the of Chinese modern history and the history of the Communist Party of China; described the relationship between the two historical paradigms; and forced against the wrong idea of “farewell to revolution”. The important influences of his researches are reflected in the following aspects: enriching the paradigm theory of the history of CPC, improving the theoretical thinking of the research on the history of CPC, and pointing out the direction for constructing the intermediary theory system of the historiography of CPC.
- Hu Sheng,
- research on the history of CPC,
- theory and method,
- revolution paradigm,
- modernized paradigm

FullText(HTML)

References(25)

References

[1]	[美]库恩.科学中的革命[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,1999.
[2]	张海鹏. 20世纪中国近代史学科体系问题的探索[J]. 近代史研究,2005, (1):1-29, 314.
[3]	罗荣渠.现代化新论续编[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,1997.
[4]	步平. 改革开放与中国近代史研究[J]. 近代史研究,2009, (5):4-21, 2.
[5]	董正华. 多种“范式”并存有益于史学的繁荣[J]. 史学理论研究,2003, (3):8-11.
[6]	张静如. 关于《唯物史观与中共党史学》[J]. 中共党史研究,1996, (2):9-15.
[7]	胡绳.胡绳全书第三卷(下)[M]. 北京:人民出版社,1998.
[8]	中共中央文献研究室综合研究组.老一代革命家论党史与党史研究[M]. 西安:陕西人民出版社,1993.
[9]	毛泽东选集(第二卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1991.
[10]	王学典.20世纪中国史学评论[M]. 济南:山东人民出版社,2002.
[11]	郭世佑,邱巍.突破重围:中国早期现代化研究[M]. 郑州:河南人民出版社,2010.
[12]	中国社会科学院科研局组织编选.胡绳集[M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社,2003.
[13]	姜涛. 50年来的晚清政治史研究[J]. 近代史研究,1999, (5):22-46.
[14]	“从五四运动到人民共和国成立”课题组.胡绳论“从五四运动到人民共和国成立”[M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社,2001.
[15]	胡绳.胡绳全书第六卷(上)[M]. 北京:人民出版社,1998.
[16]	郑师渠. 近代史教材的编撰与近代史研究的“范式之争”[J]. 近代史研究,2010(2):4-12, 2.
[17]	张海鹏.中国近代通史:第1卷[M]. 南京:江苏人民出版社,2009.
[18]	胡绳.胡绳全书第三卷(上)[M]. 北京:人民出版社,1998.
[19]	周一平. 胡绳中共党史研究的理论和方法[J]. 中共党史研究,2005, (4):100-109.
[20]	张静如.暮年忆往[M]. 北京:中共党史出版社,2013.
[21]	张静如.张静如文集:第4卷 [M]. 深圳:海天出版社,2006.
[22]	张静如.张静如文集:第3卷 [M]. 深圳:海天出版社,2006.
[23]	高华. 叙事视角的多样性与当代史研究——以50年代历史研究为例[J]. 南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学版),2003 , (3):82-90.
[24]	黄坤明. 在纪念胡绳同志诞辰100周年座谈会上的讲话 [N]. 人民日报,2018-1-11(06).
[25]	黄宗智. 中国经济史中的悖论现象与当前的规范认识危机[J]. 史学理论研究,1993,(1):42-60.