LIN Haixuan, WU Yuanhua. Reflection and Construction of Marx and Agamben’s “Free Man” Subjects From the Perspective of Biopolitics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(2): 115-128. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023100057
Citation: LIN Haixuan, WU Yuanhua. Reflection and Construction of Marx and Agamben’s “Free Man” Subjects From the Perspective of Biopolitics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(2): 115-128. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023100057

Reflection and Construction of Marx and Agamben’s “Free Man” Subjects From the Perspective of Biopolitics

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023100057
  • Received Date: 2023-10-21
  • Publish Date: 2025-02-01
  • The value appeal for the free and all-round development of human beings is the common point that connects Marx’s theory of “free man” with the subject theory of contemporary biopolitics. The historical appearance and contemporary development of biopolitics continue the theme of Marx’s critique of the essence of capitalist exploitation and extend the boundaries of Marx’s contemporary form of capitalism. Marx used historical materialism and political economy to critique the essence of “free man” as “homo faber”, and the Italian left-wing scholar Giorgio Agamben used the concept of subjectivity such as “whatever singularity” to open up the theoretical direction of the Western left to understand “free man” as “political man” (homo politics). The theoretical differences between the traditional and radical subject schemes not only due to the confrontation between Marx’s “practical view of history” and Agamben’s “fractured view of history”, but also related to the different references to Aristotle’s and Hegel’s conceptions of freedom. Through the dual perspectives of “using Marx to solve Agamben” and “using Agamben to solve Marx”, it is highlighted that although there are specific differences between Marx and Agamben in terms of goals, theoretical backgrounds and construction schemes, they can produce an effective dialogue between “macro subject historical science” and “micro subject political philosophy”.

     

  • [1]
    吉乔奥·阿甘本. 幼年与历史:经验的毁灭[M]. 伊星,译. 郑州:河南大学出版社,2016.
    [2]
    俞吾金. 论两种不同的历史唯物主义概念[J]. 中国社会科学,1995(6):96-107.
    [3]
    马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯文集(第一卷)[M]. 北京:人民出版社,2009.
    [4]
    阿维纳瑞. 马克思的社会与政治思想[M]. 张东辉,译. 北京:知识产权出版社,2016.
    [5]
    刘同舫. 论“各种关系回归于人自身”对“人的解放”主题的开解[J]. 马克思主义与现实,2022(4):44-50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5961.2022.04.007
    [6]
    张婷. 阿格尼丝·赫勒关于历史普遍发展问题的思考[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2022,38(6):631-638.
    [7]
    蓝江. 穷竭与潜能:阿甘本与德勒兹论内在性[J]. 安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,41(2):24-32.
    [8]
    吉乔奥·阿甘本. 无目的的手段:政治学笔记[M]. 赵文,译. 郑州:河南大学出版社,2015.
    [9]
    吉乔奥·阿甘本. 裸体[M]. 黄晓武,译. 北京:北京大学出版社,2017.
    [10]
    马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯文集(第二卷)[M]. 北京:人民出版社,2009.
    [11]
    吉乔奥·阿甘本. 来临中的共同体[M]. 相明,赵文,王立秋,译. 西安:西北大学出版社,2019.
    [12]
    亚里士多德. 尼各马可伦理学[M]. 廖申白,译. 北京:商务印书馆,2017.
    [13]
    黑格尔. 精神现象学(上卷)[M]. 贺麟,王玖兴,译. 北京:商务印书馆,1979.
    [14]
    马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯文集(第九卷)[M]. 北京:人民出版社,2009.
    [15]
    马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯全集(第30卷)[M]. 北京:人民出版社,1995.
    [16]
    亚里士多德. 政治学[M]. 吴寿彭,译. 北京:商务印书馆,1965.
    [17]
    吴大娟. 数字技术、精神政治与权力治理的辩证法—韩炳哲数字精神政治思想管窥[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2024,40(2):16-23.
    [18]
    吉乔奥·阿甘本. 业:简论行动、过错与姿势[M]. 潘震,译. 上海:上海社会科学出版社,2021.
    [19]
    吉乔奥·阿甘本. 至高的清贫[M]. 邱捷,译. 桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2023.
    [20]
    吉乔奥·阿甘本. 巴特比,或论偶然[M]. 王立秋,严和来,译. 桂林:漓江出版社,2017.
    [21]
    吉乔奥·阿甘本. 敞开:人与动物[M]. 蓝江,译. 南京:南京大学出版社,2019.
    [22]
    吉乔奥·阿甘本. 语言与死亡:否定之地[M]. 张羽佳,译. 南京:南京大学出版社,2019.
    [23]
    汉娜·阿伦特. 人的境况[M]. 王寅丽,译. 上海:上海人民出版社,2017.
    [24]
    马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯文集(第八卷)[M]. 北京:人民出版社,2009.
    [25]
    吉乔奥·阿甘本. 神圣人:至高权力与赤裸生命[M]. 吴冠军,译. 北京:中央编译出版社,2016.
    [26]
    汉娜·阿伦特. 反抗“平庸之恶”:责任与判断[M]. 陈联营,译 . 上海:上海人民出版社,2014.
    [27]
    马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷)[M]. 北京:人民出版社,2012.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHOU De-hai. Study on Einstein’s Concept of Free Human Conscience[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(1): 79-87.
    [2]LIANG Feng. The Crisis of Contemporary Individualism and the Breakthrough of Classic Liberalism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(4): 80-84,112.
    [3]LU Jun, DUAN Xiang-wei. On the Absolute Freedom of Network Behaviour——Analysis of Network Behavior Based on Marxism's View[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(2): 88-92.
    [4]ZHANG Ti-kun, SONG Ying-hui. The Misreading and Methodology Criticism of “Chinese Liberalism Literature”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(2): 44-49.
    [5]ZHANG Ti-kun. Discourse Construction and Theory Interpretation of Chinese Liberalism Literature——And Criticism of Some Extensive Liberalism Tendencies[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(2): 24-29.
    [6]YE Zhi-peng. Liberty,Democracy and Rule of Law——On Hayeke's Liberty Thoughts[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(4): 61-66.
    [7]ZHOU Hong-ying. Non-arbitrariness of Language——an Interpretation from the Transitivity System[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 101-106,116.
    [8]XIAO Jian-guo, HUANG Zhong-shun. Research on Problems in the Application of Discretional Undertaking[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(1): 54-62.
    [9]ZHU Hai-lin. Possibility: the Realization Realm of Post-modern Moral Freedom[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 154-159.
    [10]PANG Jin-you. Analysis of the Weak Government Theory of Modern Western Liberalism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(4): 32-37.
    [11]LIANG Feng. The Internal Crisis of Liberalism and Hayek[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(3): 149-155,161.
    [12]LUO Ke-quan. The Individuals Communities of Negative Freedom: on Noziek's Heterogeneity Utopia[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 51-54.
    [13]ZHANG Lin-shan. Urbanization and the Gradient Transfer Model of the Surplus Rural Labor Force in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(3): 17-20,35.
    [14]CHEN Yu-wu. Rethinking Yan Fu's Charactericistics of Liberalists[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(4): 125-130.
    [15]FENG Ying. To Achieve Liberty Step by Step——On YAN Fu's Thoughts of Social Change[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(4): 63-66.
    [16]ZHU Miao-kuan. Deepen Cognition of Socialist Surplus Value[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(4): 71-74.
    [17]YU Hui-yuan. “Nothing”——the Philosophical Dimension of Freedom --on Sartre's Thought of “Nothing”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(4): 52-56.
    [18]FENG Ying. The Explanation of YAN Fu's Definition about Liberty[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(4): 57-60.
    [19]XUN Jian-li. The End of Certainty and Individual Freedoms[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(3): 11-14,54.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-06020406080
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 32.1 %FULLTEXT: 32.1 %META: 66.3 %META: 66.3 %PDF: 1.6 %PDF: 1.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 6.7 %其他: 6.7 %其他: 1.6 %其他: 1.6 %Research: 0.3 %Research: 0.3 %上海: 0.5 %上海: 0.5 %乌鲁木齐: 0.3 %乌鲁木齐: 0.3 %北京: 0.8 %北京: 0.8 %南京: 1.6 %南京: 1.6 %南通: 1.3 %南通: 1.3 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.5 %哥伦布: 0.5 %墨尔本: 0.3 %墨尔本: 0.3 %大连: 0.8 %大连: 0.8 %天津: 2.1 %天津: 2.1 %宣城: 2.1 %宣城: 2.1 %广州: 0.3 %广州: 0.3 %张家口: 8.8 %张家口: 8.8 %扬州: 2.1 %扬州: 2.1 %无锡: 0.3 %无锡: 0.3 %杭州: 1.1 %杭州: 1.1 %武威: 0.3 %武威: 0.3 %武汉: 0.3 %武汉: 0.3 %泉州: 0.5 %泉州: 0.5 %淄博: 1.3 %淄博: 1.3 %温州: 0.5 %温州: 0.5 %漯河: 3.7 %漯河: 3.7 %石家庄: 9.6 %石家庄: 9.6 %芒廷维尤: 20.6 %芒廷维尤: 20.6 %芝加哥: 1.9 %芝加哥: 1.9 %苏州: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %衡阳: 0.5 %衡阳: 0.5 %西宁: 7.5 %西宁: 7.5 %西安: 0.3 %西安: 0.3 %诺沃克: 0.3 %诺沃克: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.8 %邯郸: 0.8 %郑州: 18.7 %郑州: 18.7 %长沙: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %阳泉: 0.3 %阳泉: 0.3 %其他其他Research上海乌鲁木齐北京南京南通呼和浩特哈尔滨哥伦布墨尔本大连天津宣城广州张家口扬州无锡杭州武威武汉泉州淄博温州漯河石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衡阳西宁西安诺沃克邯郸郑州长沙阳泉

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (247) PDF downloads(6) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return