HAO Li-zhong. Three Topics on Marxist Dialectics——On Distinction between Natural Dialectics and Philosophy of Scientific Technology[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(3): 50-54.
Citation: HE Wei, ZHONG Wei. Reconsideration of the Taxis between Clauses within the Framework of Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(4): 431-437. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023030024

Reconsideration of the Taxis between Clauses within the Framework of Systemic Functional Linguistics

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023030024
  • Received Date: 2023-03-05
    Available Online: 2023-06-30
  • Publish Date: 2023-08-25
  • In the field of Systemic Functional Linguistics, current researches of the taxis between clauses have been mainly based on the Sydney Model. It is argued in this paper that due to the contradictions between the doctrines of the strong rank scale hypothesis assumed by the Sydney Model, the classifications of the clause types are problematic. By comparison, the weak rank scale hypothesis proposed in the Cardiff Model is more reasonable and the descriptions of the clause types are more systematic and comprehensive. As to the overall tactic relations of language, this paper agrees with the Cardiff Model that there are two types – embedding and paratactic. Furthermore, it is demonstrated in this paper that due to the restraints of semantic configuration roles, finiteness, and logic-semantic relations, all the embedded clauses form a continuum with those characterized by the stronger embedding power and those characterized by the weaker power as two poles. Meanwhile, all the coordinate clauses form a similar continuum with those featured by the closer logic-semantic relation and those featured by the looser relation as two poles.

     

  • [1]
    HALLIDAY M A K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London: Arnold, 1985.
    [2]
    HALLIDAY M A K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.)[M]. London: Arnold, 1994.
    [3]
    HALLIDAY M A K & MATTHIESSEN C. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.) [M]. London: Arnold, 2004.
    [4]
    HALLIDAY M A K & MATTHIESSEN C. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.) [M]. London: Routledge, 2014.
    [5]
    曾蕾,朱薪羽,叶岚. 投射概念隐喻在本科毕业论文中的意义实现机制探讨−以文献综述章节为例[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2022,38(2):162-171.
    [6]
    张春燕. 拓扑学视角下的小句复合体研究[J]. 现代外语,2016,39(3):346-357,438.
    [7]
    何伟,程铭. 生态语言学视角下的逻辑关系系统[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报,2021,44(3):51-59,160.
    [8]
    王全智. 小句复合体与复句的比对研究[J]. 外语与外语教学,2008,236(11):9-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6038.2008.11.003
    [9]
    何伟,刘佳欢. 英汉语小句间逻辑语义关系及表征方式对比研究[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2019,35(2):1-17.
    [10]
    何伟,邓若晨. 现代汉语“来”“去”的功能视角研究[J]. 外语研究,2019,36(3):31-35.
    [11]
    FAWCETT R P. A Theory of Syntax for Systemic Functional Linguistics[M]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins, 2000.
    [12]
    HALLIDAY M A K. Categories of the theory of grammar [J]. Word, 1961(17):241-292.
    [13]
    MATTHEWS P H. The concept of rank in ‘Neo-Firthian’ grammar [J]. Journal of Linguistics 1966, 2(1): 101-109.
    [14]
    杨炳钧. 英语非限定小句之系统功能语言学研究[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2003.
    [15]
    FAWCETT R P. Invitation to Systemic Functional Linguistics through the Cardiff Grammar: An Extension and Simplification of Halliday’s Systemic Functional Grammar [M]. London: Equinox, 2008.
    [16]
    何伟, 高生文, 贾培培, 等. 汉语功能句法分析[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2015.
    [17]
    何伟, 张敬源, 张娇, 等. 英语功能句法分析[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2015.
    [18]
    何伟,仲伟. 汉语非限定小句之功能研究[J]. 语文研究,2018,148(3):8-14.
    [19]
    何伟,仲伟. 英汉非限定小句之功能视角对比研究[J]. 外语教学理论与实践,2019,167(3):41-49.
    [20]
    何伟. 语法描写与分析有机观[J]. 外语教学理论与实践,2021,175(3):12-25.
    [21]
    何伟,仲伟. 系统功能语法视角下汉语小句的限定与非限定之分[J]. 外语教学,2017,38(5):7-12.
    [22]
    何伟, 张瑞杰, 淡晓红, 等. 英语功能语义分析[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2017.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]WU Dajuan. Dialectics of Digital Technology, Spiritual Politics, and Power Governance[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(2): 16-23. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023050036
    [2]LIU Chang-jun, WANG Dong-yu. Exploring the theoretical basis of Marxism in “Great Ideological and Political Course”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(2): 181-187. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022120005
    [3]ZHANG Qing-wei, FU Chen-jia. The Century-old Evolution of the Scientific Discourse of the Communist Party of China from the Perspective of Marxism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(4): 376-382.
    [4]LIU Xing. On the Modern Value of the Ecological Thought in Engels' Dialectics of Nature[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(1): 100-106.
    [5]ZHANG Lan. The Marxist Philosophical Foundation of Ecolinguistics: Anti-logocentrism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(2): 29-37.
    [6]YAN Feng. The Misunderstanding of Science——The Mistakes in The Introduction of Science and Technology[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(2): 69-77.
    [7]MA Bai-lian, WANG Rui. The Quantitative Analysis of the Texts of Chinese Dialectics of Nature——Based on the Distribution of the Author Group from 1956 to 1966[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(5): 77-82.
    [8]LI Tong-yu, SUN Yue. The Discussion on the Criterion of Truth and Dialectics of Nature——Commemorating the 35 Anniversary of the Discussion on the Criterion of Truth[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(6): 35-39.
    [9]SUN Bo. Between the “Speculativeness” and Contemplation of Nature——On the Natural Dialectics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(2): 13-17.
    [10]XU Zhong-ming, YU Ming-zi. Some Thoughts on the Relation between Science-technology and Ideology[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(1): 20-24.
    [11]MA Bai-lian, WANG Rui. The Relationships between Natural Dialectics and Political Movement——Based on the Literatures of Natural Dialectics from 1956 to 1966[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(2): 8-12.
    [13]LI Tong-yu, WANG Yao-dong. The Spread of Dialectics of Nature from the Perspective of the Times(Ⅰ)——A Study of Text Interpretation and Political Situation from 1930s to 1980s[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(4): 57-63.
    [14]YAN Feng. Thought on Marxism Theory of Post-graduates Majoring in Science, Engineering, Agriculture and Health Science[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(1): 149-153,157.
    [15]LI Xiao-guang. The Development of Marxism at the Present Age——A Perspective from Gender[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 145-152,160.
    [16]HUANG Zhi-gao. Schram's Discussion on Sinolization of Marxism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(4): 131-135,140.
    [17]ZHANG Xin. Some Thoughts on Western Marxism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(4): 67-70.
    [18]LIU Jian-li. On the Two Marks of the Formation of Marxism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2000, 16(4): 11-14.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-0601020304050
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 46.4 %FULLTEXT: 46.4 %META: 50.8 %META: 50.8 %PDF: 2.7 %PDF: 2.7 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 6.1 %其他: 6.1 %Prineville: 0.1 %Prineville: 0.1 %Taoyuan District: 0.3 %Taoyuan District: 0.3 %Weitang: 0.4 %Weitang: 0.4 %上海: 0.9 %上海: 0.9 %中卫: 0.1 %中卫: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %北京: 2.5 %北京: 2.5 %十堰: 0.8 %十堰: 0.8 %华盛顿州: 0.1 %华盛顿州: 0.1 %南京: 0.6 %南京: 0.6 %南宁: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %南通: 0.6 %南通: 0.6 %台州: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.4 %哥伦布: 0.4 %嘉兴: 0.8 %嘉兴: 0.8 %大连: 0.5 %大连: 0.5 %天津: 2.2 %天津: 2.2 %太原: 0.3 %太原: 0.3 %威海: 0.1 %威海: 0.1 %宣城: 0.5 %宣城: 0.5 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %广州: 0.3 %广州: 0.3 %延边: 0.1 %延边: 0.1 %开封: 0.1 %开封: 0.1 %张家口: 0.8 %张家口: 0.8 %徐州: 0.4 %徐州: 0.4 %怀化: 0.3 %怀化: 0.3 %悉尼: 0.1 %悉尼: 0.1 %扬州: 1.6 %扬州: 1.6 %昆明: 1.2 %昆明: 1.2 %本溪: 0.3 %本溪: 0.3 %杭州: 1.3 %杭州: 1.3 %武汉: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %济南: 0.4 %济南: 0.4 %淄博: 0.5 %淄博: 0.5 %淮南: 0.4 %淮南: 0.4 %温州: 1.2 %温州: 1.2 %湖州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %漯河: 5.1 %漯河: 5.1 %珠海: 0.5 %珠海: 0.5 %石家庄: 2.5 %石家庄: 2.5 %罗拉赫: 0.4 %罗拉赫: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 26.5 %芒廷维尤: 26.5 %芝加哥: 1.8 %芝加哥: 1.8 %衡水: 0.4 %衡水: 0.4 %衡阳: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %衢州: 0.3 %衢州: 0.3 %西宁: 26.7 %西宁: 26.7 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %达州: 0.1 %达州: 0.1 %运城: 1.0 %运城: 1.0 %邯郸: 0.6 %邯郸: 0.6 %郑州: 3.5 %郑州: 3.5 %镇江: 0.1 %镇江: 0.1 %长春: 0.1 %长春: 0.1 %长沙: 1.0 %长沙: 1.0 %长治: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %雅加达: 0.5 %雅加达: 0.5 %青岛: 0.1 %青岛: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.4 %马鞍山: 0.4 %黄冈: 0.1 %黄冈: 0.1 %其他PrinevilleTaoyuan DistrictWeitang上海中卫保定北京十堰华盛顿州南京南宁南通台州呼和浩特哥伦布嘉兴大连天津太原威海宣城常州平顶山广州延边开封张家口徐州怀化悉尼扬州昆明本溪杭州武汉济南淄博淮南温州湖州漯河珠海石家庄罗拉赫芒廷维尤芝加哥衡水衡阳衢州西宁贵阳达州运城邯郸郑州镇江长春长沙长治雅加达青岛马鞍山黄冈

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (392) PDF downloads(21) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return