Volume 39 Issue 4
Aug.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition)  > 2023  >  39(4): 486-500
WANG Lian-wei, CHEN Man-qing. The Logic of Constitutionalism in the Context of Moral Philosophy——on Kant's Constitutional Thought[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(3): 34-37.
Citation: ZHU Zufei, KANG Ming. Interpreting the Independence of Real Right Act in the Civil Code[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(4): 486-500. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100050
shu

Interpreting the Independence of Real Right Act in the Civil Code-Based on the Independent Expression Form of Real Right Act in Foreign Legislation

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100050
  • 1.

    Center for Legal Philosophy, Hubei University, Hubei 430062, China

  • 2.

    Law School, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China

  • Received Date: 2022-10-12
    Available Online: 2023-06-30
  • Publish Date: 2023-08-25
    Abstract
  • The real right of Civil Code should admit independent behavior of real right for simplifying theory, maintaining consistent system, and thinking economy. The independence expression form of the real right action is the independence expression of real right meaning. Throughout the foreign legislation, the expressions of real right meaning are diversified, but all need to be made in legal form. This provides a useful explanation method for the independent existence of real right behaviors in the compilation of real right in the Civil Code of our country. “Civil Code” property rights adopt a variety of real right change modes. From the perspective of explanation theory, the performances of property rights of the Civil Code are also diversified. For instance, in “effective publication” real right change mode, the independent property rights agreement between the parties are embodied in actor “delivery” and “registration” performance. In “public antagonism” real right change mode, the parties ‘independent agreement on real right will be objectified in the form of written contract, and it exists in the same contract text as the parties’ agreement on creditor’s right.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(52)
  • [1]
    葛云松. 物权行为:传说中的不死鸟−《物权法》上的物权变动模式研究[J]. 华东政法大学学报,2007,55(6):102-118.
    [2]
    谢在全. 民法物权论[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2011.
    [3]
    陈卫佐. 处分行为理论之正本清源[J]. 政治与法律,2015,242(7):105-122.
    [4]
    王轶. 民法典编纂争议问题的类型区分[J]. 社会科学文摘,2020(8):65-67.
    [5]
    孙小礼. 马赫和他的思维经济原则[J]. 哲学研究,1986(10):29-36.
    [6]
    杨震,申建平. 物权行为理论探源−以罗马法为中心[J]. 学术交流,2002(5):47-50.
    [7]
    卡尔·拉伦茨. 法学方法论[M]. 黄家镇, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2020.
    [8]
    王泽鉴. 民法总则[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2009.
    [9]
    朱庆育. 物权行为的规范结构与我国之所有权变动[J]. 法学家,2013,141(6):62-80,175.
    [10]
    王轶. 物权变动论[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2001.
    [11]
    董学立. 论《物权法》确立的物权变动新模式[J]. 法学论坛,2011,26(4):54-64.
    [12]
    RASKIN M. The law and legality of smart contracts [J]. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 2017, 1:305-341.
    [13]
    宋旭明,崔静静. 区块链上与链下物之多重买卖的法律效力研究[J]. 南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版),2020,51(2):77-88.
    [14]
    吕睿智. 何以合法: 对智能合同可行性的追问[EB/OL]. （2022-09-08）[2023-05-04]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/50.1023.C.20210616.1535.006.html
    [15]
    苏永钦. 走入新世纪的私法自治[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2002.
    [16]
    孙宪忠. 再谈物权行为理论[J]. 中国社会科学,2001(5):125-135,207.
    [17]
    孙宪忠. 物权行为理论探源及其意义[J]. 法学研究,1996(3):80-92.
    [18]
    杨代雄. 法律行为论[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2021.
    [19]
    鲍尔·施蒂尔纳. 德国物权法（上册）[M]. 张双根, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2004.
    [20]
    孙宪忠. 论物权法[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2001.
    [21]
    王泽鉴. 民法学说与判例研究（第五册）[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2009.
    [22]
    葛云松. 物权行为理论研究[J]. 中外法学,2004(6):702-741.
    [23]
    杨代雄. 抵押合同作为负担行为的双重效果[J]. 中外法学,2019,31(3):762-779.
    [24]
    陈华彬. 物权法论[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2018.
    [25]
    季境. 物权变动立法模式在我国的修正及其完善[J]. 法律适用,2015,350(5):34-39.
    [26]
    常鹏翱. 另一种物权行为理论−以瑞士法为考察对象[J]. 环球法律评论,2010,32(2):99-111.
    [27]
    孙宪忠. 中国物权法总论（第四版）[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2018.
    [28]
    康德. 判断力批判[M]. 李秋零, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2011.
    [29]
    邓晓芒. 《康德判断力批判》释义[M]. 北京: 生活 读书 新知三联书店, 2008.
    [30]
    康德. 法的形而上学原理——权利的科学[M]. 沈叔平, 译; 林荣远, 校. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2009.
    [31]
    于海涌. 论绝对物权行为理论之建构−对萨维尼物权行为理论的矫正[J]. 法商研究,2006(4):55-63.
    [32]
    黄立. 民法总则[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2002.
    [33]
    佟柔主编. 中国民法[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2001.
    [34]
    邱聪智. 民法总则（上）[M]. 北京: 三民书局, 2005.
    [35]
    谢怀栻,程啸. 物权行为理论辨析[J]. 法学研究,2002(4):89-95.
    [36]
    梁慧星. 中国物权法研究（上）[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 1998.
    [37]
    张俊浩. 民法学原理[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 1997.
    [38]
    田士永. 物权行为理论研究[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2002.
    [39]
    崔建远主编. 合同法（修订本）[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2000.
    [40]
    陈华彬. 民法物权论[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2010.
    [41]
    蔡立东,姜楠. 论土地承包经营权转让中的发包方同意[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报,2014,54(04):19-27,171.
    [42]
    王利明. 物权法研究·下卷（修订版）[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2007.
    [43]
    王洪亮. 动产抵押登记效力规则的独立性解析[J]. 法学,2009,336(11):88-98.
    [44]
    庄加园. 动产抵押的登记对抗原理[J]. 法学研究,2018,40(05):76-94.
    [45]
    崔建远. 我国物权立法难点问题研究[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2005.
    [46]
    王泽鉴. 民法学说与判例研究（第七册）[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2009.
    [47]
    韩世远. 合同法总论（第四版）[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2018.
    [48]
    章正璋. 他物权设立合同之性质及特殊性问题研究[J]. 学术界,2020,261(2):136-141.
    [49]
    梁慧星. 民法总论（第五版）[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2017.
    [50]
    陈永强. 中国民法处分行为之多元模式[J]. 法治研究,2020,130(4):16-27.
    [51]
    潘运华. 习近平法治思想中的“国家治理现代化”法治理念与民法典规范[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2022,38(2):208-214.
    [52]
    韩新磊. 物权变动混合模式的经济学分析[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2021,23(3):151-160.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]FENG Jun. Kant's Redefinition of Concept[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(6): 103-112.
    [2]LIU Chun-qiang. “Watch and See”: Chen Yinke's Educational Thoughts[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(2): 46-50.
    [3]SONG Ping-ming. Historical Evaluation of Chen Boda and the New Enlightenment Movement[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(5): 112-117.
    [4]YE Zhi-peng. Liberty,Democracy and Rule of Law——On Hayeke's Liberty Thoughts[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(4): 61-66.
    [5]WU Shi-hong. The Realistic Significance and Theoretical Value of Kant's Aesthetic Thought on “Sublimity”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(2): 18-23.
    [6]XIAO Fu-ping. On Kant's Freedom of Rational Being and Heidegger's Value of Dasein[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 142-145.
    [7]FANG Qing, SHA Zong-ping. Presence of God——An Analysis on the Role of God in the Thoughts of Locke[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(2): 160-164.
    [8]ZHANG Xiao-xi. Freedom and Equality Deduced in Logic——A Comparison between Rousseau's Thoughts and Ma Junwu's Perception[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(1): 46-50.
    [9]LI Rong. The Variation of Reason and Life——The Significance of Husseri's Life-world Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(4): 132-135.
    [10]KANG Zhi-guo. An Analysis of ZENG Qi's Thought of Democratic Constitutionalism during the Anti-Japanese War[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(1): 73-76.
    [11]XU Xiao-cun. The Rationally Objective Attitude in Acdenic Research——a flank of Wang Yao's research characteristics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(2): 58-61.
    [12]FANG Min. The Intermediate Forces' Ideas about Constitutionlism in the Period of the Anti-Japanese War[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(4): 48-51.
    [13]FENG Ying. To Achieve Liberty Step by Step——On YAN Fu's Thoughts of Social Change[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(4): 63-66.
    [14]ZHANG Wei-zhong. The Cultural Thihking of the Thirteen Books of Euclid's Elements[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(1): 70-73.
    [15]FENG Ying. The Explanation of YAN Fu's Definition about Liberty[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(4): 57-60.
    [16]YU Hui-yuan. “Nothing”——the Philosophical Dimension of Freedom --on Sartre's Thought of “Nothing”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(4): 52-56.
    [17]CUI Ying, MENG Ling-qi. The Relationship between Human Rights, Constitution and Constitutionalism in the United States[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(2): 18-20.
    [18]LI Wan-ping. Value and Fulfillment of the Right to Silence[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 76-79.
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-0601020304050
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 22.2 %FULLTEXT: 22.2 %META: 72.2 %META: 72.2 %PDF: 5.5 %PDF: 5.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 7.2 %其他: 7.2 %其他: 1.3 %其他: 1.3 %Central District: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %上海: 3.7 %上海: 3.7 %东莞: 0.8 %东莞: 0.8 %中卫: 0.1 %中卫: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %内江: 0.1 %内江: 0.1 %北京: 3.7 %北京: 3.7 %十堰: 0.1 %十堰: 0.1 %南京: 1.7 %南京: 1.7 %南宁: 0.2 %南宁: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %唐山: 0.2 %唐山: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %墨尔本: 0.2 %墨尔本: 0.2 %大连: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %天津: 0.7 %天津: 0.7 %太原: 0.1 %太原: 0.1 %宁波: 0.5 %宁波: 0.5 %宣城: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.2 %平顶山: 0.2 %广州: 0.9 %广州: 0.9 %庆阳: 0.1 %庆阳: 0.1 %张家口: 2.6 %张家口: 2.6 %张家界: 0.3 %张家界: 0.3 %徐州: 0.1 %徐州: 0.1 %成都: 0.2 %成都: 0.2 %扬州: 0.2 %扬州: 0.2 %新加坡: 0.3 %新加坡: 0.3 %昆明: 0.9 %昆明: 0.9 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 4.4 %杭州: 4.4 %枣庄: 0.1 %枣庄: 0.1 %桂林: 0.1 %桂林: 0.1 %武威: 0.1 %武威: 0.1 %武汉: 0.7 %武汉: 0.7 %江门: 0.2 %江门: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %济南: 0.4 %济南: 0.4 %济宁: 0.2 %济宁: 0.2 %淄博: 0.3 %淄博: 0.3 %深圳: 0.8 %深圳: 0.8 %温州: 5.0 %温州: 5.0 %漯河: 1.1 %漯河: 1.1 %澳门: 0.3 %澳门: 0.3 %濮阳: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %珠海: 0.5 %珠海: 0.5 %石家庄: 1.4 %石家庄: 1.4 %福州: 0.5 %福州: 0.5 %芒廷维尤: 16.4 %芒廷维尤: 16.4 %芝加哥: 0.4 %芝加哥: 0.4 %苏州: 7.4 %苏州: 7.4 %萍乡: 0.1 %萍乡: 0.1 %蚌埠: 0.1 %蚌埠: 0.1 %衡水: 0.2 %衡水: 0.2 %衢州: 0.1 %衢州: 0.1 %西宁: 22.4 %西宁: 22.4 %西安: 0.3 %西安: 0.3 %贵港: 0.3 %贵港: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %郑州: 5.5 %郑州: 5.5 %重庆: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %金华: 0.2 %金华: 0.2 %长沙: 0.7 %长沙: 0.7 %阳泉: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.1 %阿姆斯特丹: 0.1 %阿姆斯特丹: 0.1 %青岛: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %鞍山: 0.2 %鞍山: 0.2 %黄冈: 0.5 %黄冈: 0.5 %其他其他Central DistrictRochester上海东莞中卫佛山六安兰州内江北京十堰南京南宁南昌呼和浩特哥伦布唐山嘉兴墨尔本大连天津太原宁波宣城平顶山广州庆阳张家口张家界徐州成都扬州新加坡昆明朝阳杭州枣庄桂林武威武汉江门沈阳洛阳济南济宁淄博深圳温州漯河澳门濮阳烟台珠海石家庄福州芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州萍乡蚌埠衡水衢州西宁西安贵港邯郸郑州重庆金华长沙阳泉阿姆斯特丹青岛鞍山黄冈

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (743) PDF downloads(57) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © Journal of Univeraity of Science and Technology Beijing.京ICP备13030111号

    Address：Room 305, Library, 30 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing (100083)   website：https://bkds.ustb.edu.cn/   Tel：010-62334089

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return