Articles in press have been peer-reviewed and accepted, which are not yet assigned to volumes /issues, but are citable by Digital Object Identifier (DOI).
Display Method:
2026, 42(5): 1-8.
doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2026040047
Abstract:
On May 17, 2016, General Secretary Xi Jinping delivered an important speech at the symposium on philosophy and social sciences work (the “May 17 Speech”), in which he explicitly put forward for the first time the strategic task of “accelerating the development of philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics”, emphasizing that they should embody Chinese characteristics, style, and ethos in terms of guiding ideology, disciplinary system, academic system, and discourse system. Guided by the spirit of the “May 17 Speech”, this paper systematically expounds the theoretical position of Xi Jinping Thought on Ecological Civilization as the principal content of philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics, and reveals its profound foundation rooted in the “Two Integrations”—carrying forward the theoretical foundation of the Marxist view of nature while revitalizing the ecological wisdom of “harmony between humanity and nature” from fine traditional Chinese culture. It analyzes the philosophical foundation of Xi Jinping Thought on Ecological Civilization and demonstrates the theoretical paradigm significance of “a community of life for humanity and nature” as a meta-concept. On this basis, the paper explores the paths to construct China’s independent knowledge system for ecological civilization: achieving a “terminological revolution” with iconic concepts, forging an academic system through disciplinary integration, and enhancing discursive power with a global vision.
On May 17, 2016, General Secretary Xi Jinping delivered an important speech at the symposium on philosophy and social sciences work (the “May 17 Speech”), in which he explicitly put forward for the first time the strategic task of “accelerating the development of philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics”, emphasizing that they should embody Chinese characteristics, style, and ethos in terms of guiding ideology, disciplinary system, academic system, and discourse system. Guided by the spirit of the “May 17 Speech”, this paper systematically expounds the theoretical position of Xi Jinping Thought on Ecological Civilization as the principal content of philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics, and reveals its profound foundation rooted in the “Two Integrations”—carrying forward the theoretical foundation of the Marxist view of nature while revitalizing the ecological wisdom of “harmony between humanity and nature” from fine traditional Chinese culture. It analyzes the philosophical foundation of Xi Jinping Thought on Ecological Civilization and demonstrates the theoretical paradigm significance of “a community of life for humanity and nature” as a meta-concept. On this basis, the paper explores the paths to construct China’s independent knowledge system for ecological civilization: achieving a “terminological revolution” with iconic concepts, forging an academic system through disciplinary integration, and enhancing discursive power with a global vision.
2026, 42(5): 9-16.
doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2026030113
Abstract:
Xi Jinping Thought on Ecological Civilization embodies rich implications of a correct understanding of governance performance, encompassing six dimensions: a holistic understanding of governance performance that keeps in mind “the top priorities of the country”; a livelihood-oriented understanding of governance performance that upholds putting people first; a development-oriented understanding of governance performance that practices the “Two Mountains” concept; a pragmatic understanding of governance performance that emphasizes sustained and long-term efforts; a coordinated understanding of governance performance that upholds systematic governance; and a bottom-line understanding of governance performance that strictly safeguards ecological red lines. These six dimensions are interconnected and organically unified. They are grounded in the holistic laws of ecosystems while closely aligning with the orientation of high-quality development and people’s well-being. They provide profound answers to major questions in ecological civilization construction in the new era, namely, “for whom should performance be pursued, what kind of performance should be pursued, and by what means should such performance be achieved”. They offer fundamental guidance for leading officials at all levels to abandon the erroneous understanding of governance performance that seeks quick success and instant benefits or the pursuit of one-sided economic growth. Moreover, they hold significant theoretical value and practical guiding significance for promoting modernization characterized by harmonious coexistence between humans and nature, advancing the construction of a Beautiful China, and realizing the sustainable development of the Chinese nation.
Xi Jinping Thought on Ecological Civilization embodies rich implications of a correct understanding of governance performance, encompassing six dimensions: a holistic understanding of governance performance that keeps in mind “the top priorities of the country”; a livelihood-oriented understanding of governance performance that upholds putting people first; a development-oriented understanding of governance performance that practices the “Two Mountains” concept; a pragmatic understanding of governance performance that emphasizes sustained and long-term efforts; a coordinated understanding of governance performance that upholds systematic governance; and a bottom-line understanding of governance performance that strictly safeguards ecological red lines. These six dimensions are interconnected and organically unified. They are grounded in the holistic laws of ecosystems while closely aligning with the orientation of high-quality development and people’s well-being. They provide profound answers to major questions in ecological civilization construction in the new era, namely, “for whom should performance be pursued, what kind of performance should be pursued, and by what means should such performance be achieved”. They offer fundamental guidance for leading officials at all levels to abandon the erroneous understanding of governance performance that seeks quick success and instant benefits or the pursuit of one-sided economic growth. Moreover, they hold significant theoretical value and practical guiding significance for promoting modernization characterized by harmonious coexistence between humans and nature, advancing the construction of a Beautiful China, and realizing the sustainable development of the Chinese nation.
2026, 42(5): 17-23.
doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2026040115
Abstract:
To define and expound the position, significance and value of Xi Jinping Thought on Ecological Civilization in the evolution of Marxist thought on the relationship between humanity and nature, and even in the history of human environmental thought, and to conduct its scientific theoretical positioning, constitutes an essential requirement for clarifying the connotations of this thought in knowledge systems, academic disciplines and practical guidance. Xi Jinping Thought on Ecological Civilization is a landmark achievement in the CPC’s theoretical innovation on ecological civilization. From the perspective of theoretical relevance, it constitutes an important component of Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era, together forming a logically rigorous and systematically comprehensive theoretical system. From the perspective of innovative pathways, it represents a major outcome of applying the “two intergrations” to ecological civilization construction, realizing a new leap in Marxist thought on the relationship between humanity and nature that adapts to the Chinese context and the needs of the times. From the perspective of historical genesis, it elevates the Party’s understanding of the laws of ecological civilization construction to an unprecedented height and opens up the ecological dimension of historical materialism. From the perspective of practical value, it provides fundamental guidance for comprehensively advancing the modernization of harmony between humanity and nature in the Beautiful China Initiative, demonstrating strong ideological leadership in terms of development concepts, construction goals, civilizational dimensions and other aspects. Scientific comprehension of the theoretical positioning of Xi Jinping Thought on Ecological Civilization is instrumental in advancing the indigenous knowledge system of China’s ecological civilization and informing its practical advancement.
To define and expound the position, significance and value of Xi Jinping Thought on Ecological Civilization in the evolution of Marxist thought on the relationship between humanity and nature, and even in the history of human environmental thought, and to conduct its scientific theoretical positioning, constitutes an essential requirement for clarifying the connotations of this thought in knowledge systems, academic disciplines and practical guidance. Xi Jinping Thought on Ecological Civilization is a landmark achievement in the CPC’s theoretical innovation on ecological civilization. From the perspective of theoretical relevance, it constitutes an important component of Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era, together forming a logically rigorous and systematically comprehensive theoretical system. From the perspective of innovative pathways, it represents a major outcome of applying the “two intergrations” to ecological civilization construction, realizing a new leap in Marxist thought on the relationship between humanity and nature that adapts to the Chinese context and the needs of the times. From the perspective of historical genesis, it elevates the Party’s understanding of the laws of ecological civilization construction to an unprecedented height and opens up the ecological dimension of historical materialism. From the perspective of practical value, it provides fundamental guidance for comprehensively advancing the modernization of harmony between humanity and nature in the Beautiful China Initiative, demonstrating strong ideological leadership in terms of development concepts, construction goals, civilizational dimensions and other aspects. Scientific comprehension of the theoretical positioning of Xi Jinping Thought on Ecological Civilization is instrumental in advancing the indigenous knowledge system of China’s ecological civilization and informing its practical advancement.
2026, 42(5): 24-32.
doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2026040031
Abstract:
Under the historical conditions of in-depth advancement of global modernization and continuous formation of a shared world, exchanges and mutual learning between civilizations have increasingly become important theoretical and practical issues that must be addressed in the 21st century. The crux of the issue lies not in eliminating civilizational differences, but in how to construct a realistic and feasible common foundation for the coexistence of diverse civilizations on the premise of acknowledging and preserving differences. Since the New Era, the contemporary Chinese Marxist cultural outlook, based on the “Two Integrations” and represented by Xi Jinping Thought on Culture, has further deepened the understanding of the laws of cultural construction, the development of socialist culture, and the evolution of human civilization. It adheres to understanding cultural and civilizational issues from the perspective of history, practice and global connections, opposes the dissolution of civilizational differences through abstract universality, and opposes the absolutization of civilizational differences as closed boundaries, thereby providing a systematic theoretical perspective for explaining the possibility of exchanges and mutual learning between civilizations. Specifically, cultural subjectivity constitutes the premise of civilizational dialogue, enabling different civilizations to engage in equal exchanges based on their own historical experiences and value structures; openness and inclusiveness constitute the basic stance of mutual learning between civilizations, preventing civilizational relations from sliding into homogenization and conflict; the common values of all mankind provide a normative medium for different civilizations to conduct value communication and reach practical consensus on common issues; building a community with a shared future for mankind further advances this value consensus into a practical form of real-world cooperation, shared destinies and order reshaping. This theoretical approach not only reveals the internal logic that makes exchanges and mutual learning between civilizations possible, but also offers a Chinese perspective for diverse civilizations in the contemporary world to achieve mutual understanding, mutual recognition and common development.
Under the historical conditions of in-depth advancement of global modernization and continuous formation of a shared world, exchanges and mutual learning between civilizations have increasingly become important theoretical and practical issues that must be addressed in the 21st century. The crux of the issue lies not in eliminating civilizational differences, but in how to construct a realistic and feasible common foundation for the coexistence of diverse civilizations on the premise of acknowledging and preserving differences. Since the New Era, the contemporary Chinese Marxist cultural outlook, based on the “Two Integrations” and represented by Xi Jinping Thought on Culture, has further deepened the understanding of the laws of cultural construction, the development of socialist culture, and the evolution of human civilization. It adheres to understanding cultural and civilizational issues from the perspective of history, practice and global connections, opposes the dissolution of civilizational differences through abstract universality, and opposes the absolutization of civilizational differences as closed boundaries, thereby providing a systematic theoretical perspective for explaining the possibility of exchanges and mutual learning between civilizations. Specifically, cultural subjectivity constitutes the premise of civilizational dialogue, enabling different civilizations to engage in equal exchanges based on their own historical experiences and value structures; openness and inclusiveness constitute the basic stance of mutual learning between civilizations, preventing civilizational relations from sliding into homogenization and conflict; the common values of all mankind provide a normative medium for different civilizations to conduct value communication and reach practical consensus on common issues; building a community with a shared future for mankind further advances this value consensus into a practical form of real-world cooperation, shared destinies and order reshaping. This theoretical approach not only reveals the internal logic that makes exchanges and mutual learning between civilizations possible, but also offers a Chinese perspective for diverse civilizations in the contemporary world to achieve mutual understanding, mutual recognition and common development.
2026, 42(5): 33-40.
doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2026040026
Abstract:
The development feature of upholding fundamental principles and breaking new ground, the value pursuit of putting the people first, and the eclectic and inclusive methodological approach embodied in Xi Jinping Thought on Culture constitute the necessary prerequisites for its original contributions to adapting Marxism to the Chinese context and the needs of the times. On this basis, Xi Jinping Thought on Culture inherits the theoretical concern of the localization and adaptation of Marxism to the times, advances the historical process of adapting Marxism to the Chinese context and the needs of the times, and provides methodological guidance for its world-historical significance. This series of original contributions has propelled the liberation and development of social thought in the new era, activated the driving forces behind the flourishing of China’s cultural undertakings and the rapid development of its cultural industries. It has not only fully demonstrated the responsibility of a major country in building a modern form of Chinese civilization but also vividly interpreted China’s contribution to pioneering a new form of human civilization.
The development feature of upholding fundamental principles and breaking new ground, the value pursuit of putting the people first, and the eclectic and inclusive methodological approach embodied in Xi Jinping Thought on Culture constitute the necessary prerequisites for its original contributions to adapting Marxism to the Chinese context and the needs of the times. On this basis, Xi Jinping Thought on Culture inherits the theoretical concern of the localization and adaptation of Marxism to the times, advances the historical process of adapting Marxism to the Chinese context and the needs of the times, and provides methodological guidance for its world-historical significance. This series of original contributions has propelled the liberation and development of social thought in the new era, activated the driving forces behind the flourishing of China’s cultural undertakings and the rapid development of its cultural industries. It has not only fully demonstrated the responsibility of a major country in building a modern form of Chinese civilization but also vividly interpreted China’s contribution to pioneering a new form of human civilization.
2026, 42(5): 41-48.
doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2026040050
Abstract:
Integrating Xi Jinping Thought on Culture into ideological and political theory courses in universities is a necessary measures to promote the connotative development of ideological and political course construction, a practical need to address complex ideological struggles, a fundamental strategy to uphold and consolidate the subjectivity of Chinese culture, and an inherent requirement for cultivating new-generation of young people who shoulding the mission of national rejuvenation. To effectively integrate Xi Jinping Thought on Culture into ideological and political theory courses in universities, priority should be given to grasping the core contents inherent in this thought, including the theory of cultural value, theory of cultural leadership, theory of cultural subjectivity, theory of missions and tasks, theory of path and methodology, and theory of mutual learning among civilizations. Efforts should be made to strengthen top-level design and build a systematic integration mechanism; deepen theoretical interpretation and improve the scientific level of integration; base on course characteristics and promote differentiated integration strategies; and expand educational scenarios to build an all-round education system.
Integrating Xi Jinping Thought on Culture into ideological and political theory courses in universities is a necessary measures to promote the connotative development of ideological and political course construction, a practical need to address complex ideological struggles, a fundamental strategy to uphold and consolidate the subjectivity of Chinese culture, and an inherent requirement for cultivating new-generation of young people who shoulding the mission of national rejuvenation. To effectively integrate Xi Jinping Thought on Culture into ideological and political theory courses in universities, priority should be given to grasping the core contents inherent in this thought, including the theory of cultural value, theory of cultural leadership, theory of cultural subjectivity, theory of missions and tasks, theory of path and methodology, and theory of mutual learning among civilizations. Efforts should be made to strengthen top-level design and build a systematic integration mechanism; deepen theoretical interpretation and improve the scientific level of integration; base on course characteristics and promote differentiated integration strategies; and expand educational scenarios to build an all-round education system.
2016, 32(1): 1-20.
摘要：
文章旨在通过回顾Halliday、Matthiessen、Martin、Fawcett等国外主要学者有关系统功能语言学及物性理论的研究，并通过呈现及物性理论在国内的发展和再发展情况，厘清系统功能语言学及物性理论的发展脉络，同时指出及物性理论研究中存在的主要问题，从而进一步完善英语及物性系统网络，并建构比较完整的汉语及物性系统网络。
文章旨在通过回顾Halliday、Matthiessen、Martin、Fawcett等国外主要学者有关系统功能语言学及物性理论的研究，并通过呈现及物性理论在国内的发展和再发展情况，厘清系统功能语言学及物性理论的发展脉络，同时指出及物性理论研究中存在的主要问题，从而进一步完善英语及物性系统网络，并建构比较完整的汉语及物性系统网络。
2018, 34(4): 33-41.
摘要：
生态话语分析模式将生态场所观与系统功能语言学理论相结合，为生态语言学研究提供了理论依据。使用生态话语分析模式，从及物性、语气、情态、评价、主位和信息等系统对英国BBC关于中国雾霾报道的新闻标题进行生态视角的细化分析，并进行综合实证分析，能够从语言角度发掘话语的生态意义，揭示媒体报道的生态取向。由于新闻不可避免地承载着意识形态，BBC关于中国雾霾报道的主题不全面，但总体上对负面生态状况给予了负面的报道，BBC的中国雾霾新闻标题具有生态保护型语篇的特点。对BBC新闻标题的话语生态分析也会对我国的新闻媒体有所启发。
生态话语分析模式将生态场所观与系统功能语言学理论相结合，为生态语言学研究提供了理论依据。使用生态话语分析模式，从及物性、语气、情态、评价、主位和信息等系统对英国BBC关于中国雾霾报道的新闻标题进行生态视角的细化分析，并进行综合实证分析，能够从语言角度发掘话语的生态意义，揭示媒体报道的生态取向。由于新闻不可避免地承载着意识形态，BBC关于中国雾霾报道的主题不全面，但总体上对负面生态状况给予了负面的报道，BBC的中国雾霾新闻标题具有生态保护型语篇的特点。对BBC新闻标题的话语生态分析也会对我国的新闻媒体有所启发。
2018, 34(4): 27-32.
摘要：
论文在系统功能语言学视角下，尝试构建包括意识形态、语境和语言本体三个层面的生态话语多层次分析模式，且以该模式对2016年中国环保部长报告进行分析。研究发现，报告内容蕴含了马克思主义生态发展观和共享发展观；语言体现典型的政治语言特色；大量运用语法隐喻；句型基本为陈述句，且主要为祈使句；主位推进模式促进语篇连贯，且广泛使用词汇衔接、连接词及照应这三种衔接手段。多层次分析模式有助于全面深入探讨生态话语的认知功能生成机制，进一步丰富了生态语言学的理论与研究方法。
论文在系统功能语言学视角下，尝试构建包括意识形态、语境和语言本体三个层面的生态话语多层次分析模式，且以该模式对2016年中国环保部长报告进行分析。研究发现，报告内容蕴含了马克思主义生态发展观和共享发展观；语言体现典型的政治语言特色；大量运用语法隐喻；句型基本为陈述句，且主要为祈使句；主位推进模式促进语篇连贯，且广泛使用词汇衔接、连接词及照应这三种衔接手段。多层次分析模式有助于全面深入探讨生态话语的认知功能生成机制，进一步丰富了生态语言学的理论与研究方法。
2019, 35(5): 98-105.
摘要：
行为保全标准中“难以弥补的损害”要件存在内涵解释模糊、实践缺乏系统性指引等问题。为给予实践更加清晰、明确的指引，应从理论上深入分析和系统研究。通过本土解析和比较研究可以认为“难以弥补的损害”是指财产保全和终局裁判均不能弥补的损害。在裁量路径上，应结合难以弥补的损害的性质，将其类型化为损害赔偿无法弥补和赔偿数额难以计算两种类型。
行为保全标准中“难以弥补的损害”要件存在内涵解释模糊、实践缺乏系统性指引等问题。为给予实践更加清晰、明确的指引，应从理论上深入分析和系统研究。通过本土解析和比较研究可以认为“难以弥补的损害”是指财产保全和终局裁判均不能弥补的损害。在裁量路径上，应结合难以弥补的损害的性质，将其类型化为损害赔偿无法弥补和赔偿数额难以计算两种类型。
2016, 32(5): 8-13,60.
摘要：
隐喻场景把系列转喻链和隐喻链整合成虚拟的叙事场景，用故事逻辑激活与场景相关的概念、评价和假定，实现对目标域基于既定立场和意识形态的概念化识解。文章以《经济学人》中涉华政治漫画为例，重点分析频繁使用的“冲突/战斗”多模态隐喻场景的结构特征和运作机制，揭示该类语篇的政治性或意识形态性本质——带有明显的国家立场、偏见和刻板印象。文章倡议解读者在解读该类语篇时，应该清醒认识生产者的政治、意识形态或国家立场，批判地认识它所建构的概念。
隐喻场景把系列转喻链和隐喻链整合成虚拟的叙事场景，用故事逻辑激活与场景相关的概念、评价和假定，实现对目标域基于既定立场和意识形态的概念化识解。文章以《经济学人》中涉华政治漫画为例，重点分析频繁使用的“冲突/战斗”多模态隐喻场景的结构特征和运作机制，揭示该类语篇的政治性或意识形态性本质——带有明显的国家立场、偏见和刻板印象。文章倡议解读者在解读该类语篇时，应该清醒认识生产者的政治、意识形态或国家立场，批判地认识它所建构的概念。
2020, 36(6): 17-25.
摘要：
文章采用国际生态话语系统视角，把能源白皮书视为重要的能源生态话语类型。收集中国和英国发布的能源白皮书，创建两个小型能源白皮书语料库。运用语料库检索软件，对高频词、检索行进行对比分析。语料库分析表明，中英两国的能源白皮书话语均主张采用技术创新路径应对化石能源困局。受能源禀赋、能源发展阶段及社会历史文化语境的影响，两国白皮书也呈现出明显的不同，面对能源困局和未来发展，中国能源白皮书体现出强烈的家国情怀和世界大同意识，更强调采取实际行动，务实解决问题；而英国则更倾向于采用二元对立思想，把能源转型视为国际能源技术和能源霸权角逐的战场。从国际生态话语角度来看，相较于英国，中国能源白皮书体现出更积极的生态意识，视国家为生命有机体，世界各国和而不同；能源资源是大自然的馈赠，人类应节约高效利用能源。文章倡议面对化石能源困局，人类应采用人与自然和谐的生态观，重塑人类的生活、习惯、组织形式和价值取向，从根本上实现从化石能源向可再生能源的彻底转型。
文章采用国际生态话语系统视角，把能源白皮书视为重要的能源生态话语类型。收集中国和英国发布的能源白皮书，创建两个小型能源白皮书语料库。运用语料库检索软件，对高频词、检索行进行对比分析。语料库分析表明，中英两国的能源白皮书话语均主张采用技术创新路径应对化石能源困局。受能源禀赋、能源发展阶段及社会历史文化语境的影响，两国白皮书也呈现出明显的不同，面对能源困局和未来发展，中国能源白皮书体现出强烈的家国情怀和世界大同意识，更强调采取实际行动，务实解决问题；而英国则更倾向于采用二元对立思想，把能源转型视为国际能源技术和能源霸权角逐的战场。从国际生态话语角度来看，相较于英国，中国能源白皮书体现出更积极的生态意识，视国家为生命有机体，世界各国和而不同；能源资源是大自然的馈赠，人类应节约高效利用能源。文章倡议面对化石能源困局，人类应采用人与自然和谐的生态观，重塑人类的生活、习惯、组织形式和价值取向，从根本上实现从化石能源向可再生能源的彻底转型。
2016, 32(6): 113-118.
摘要：
伴随着信息技术与教学实践的深入结合，传统授课方式发生了深刻的变化，信息技术创新了教学理念，丰富了学生的学习体验，也推动了教学模式的革新。翻转课堂这一新的教学模式从美国兴起并很快在全球范围内掀起热潮，文章从文献计量的角度梳理国内翻转课堂文献分布情况，并对国内外翻转课堂的理论研究、模式研究和应用现状等方面进行分析比较，以期为翻转课堂在国内的深化研究提供助力。
伴随着信息技术与教学实践的深入结合，传统授课方式发生了深刻的变化，信息技术创新了教学理念，丰富了学生的学习体验，也推动了教学模式的革新。翻转课堂这一新的教学模式从美国兴起并很快在全球范围内掀起热潮，文章从文献计量的角度梳理国内翻转课堂文献分布情况，并对国内外翻转课堂的理论研究、模式研究和应用现状等方面进行分析比较，以期为翻转课堂在国内的深化研究提供助力。
2021, 37(1): 66-73.
摘要：
以事后救济为主的环境公益诉讼并不能完全实现原环境的恢复，环境议题从事后救济到事前预防的转捩，促就了预防性环境民事公益诉讼的因应。预防性环境民事公益诉讼的本质是通过诉讼程序落实风险管控的公法责任以发挥法院的环境规制作用，并弥补行政规制的不足。但既有预防性环境民事公益诉讼的规则过于模糊，存在适用盲点，亟需梳理内在规范构造。具体而言，以重大风险为启动前提，但应从“质”与“量”二维标准加以界定；以污染行为和破坏生态行为为审查对象，但应着力于以行为为主附带结果的审查标准；以公共利益为保护对象，但应区分环境公益与环境私益的实质内涵和顺位选择；以法律规定的机关与组织为诉讼主体，但应授予公民原告资格并肯定行政机关的独立参与人身份。除此之外，诉讼参与人之间的风险交流有助于推动预防性环境民事公益诉讼的进程，未来制度改革上应致力于商谈主义司法的形塑，通过强化法院职权以敦促风险交流的充分展开，最终促进法院环境规制权能的完善。
以事后救济为主的环境公益诉讼并不能完全实现原环境的恢复，环境议题从事后救济到事前预防的转捩，促就了预防性环境民事公益诉讼的因应。预防性环境民事公益诉讼的本质是通过诉讼程序落实风险管控的公法责任以发挥法院的环境规制作用，并弥补行政规制的不足。但既有预防性环境民事公益诉讼的规则过于模糊，存在适用盲点，亟需梳理内在规范构造。具体而言，以重大风险为启动前提，但应从“质”与“量”二维标准加以界定；以污染行为和破坏生态行为为审查对象，但应着力于以行为为主附带结果的审查标准；以公共利益为保护对象，但应区分环境公益与环境私益的实质内涵和顺位选择；以法律规定的机关与组织为诉讼主体，但应授予公民原告资格并肯定行政机关的独立参与人身份。除此之外，诉讼参与人之间的风险交流有助于推动预防性环境民事公益诉讼的进程，未来制度改革上应致力于商谈主义司法的形塑，通过强化法院职权以敦促风险交流的充分展开，最终促进法院环境规制权能的完善。
2020, 36(3): 48-54.
摘要：
2020年初,新冠疫情影响全世界,这场突如其来的天灾打乱了整个市场秩序,许多中小企业停产停工。在政府的正确领导下,疫情已经得到控制,但这场阵痛也暴露了中小企业由于缺乏组织韧性,应急管理能力不足,在疫情的冲击下举步维艰。文章基于应急管理背景下,结合当前市场环境,从组织韧性的概念界定、影响因素入手,深入研究组织韧性对中小企业发展的作用机理,提出三条中小企业锻造组织韧性的路径,为中小企业应对未来的不确定性风险提供理论支持。
2020年初,新冠疫情影响全世界,这场突如其来的天灾打乱了整个市场秩序,许多中小企业停产停工。在政府的正确领导下,疫情已经得到控制,但这场阵痛也暴露了中小企业由于缺乏组织韧性,应急管理能力不足,在疫情的冲击下举步维艰。文章基于应急管理背景下,结合当前市场环境,从组织韧性的概念界定、影响因素入手,深入研究组织韧性对中小企业发展的作用机理,提出三条中小企业锻造组织韧性的路径,为中小企业应对未来的不确定性风险提供理论支持。
2018, 34(3): 35-41.
摘要：
积极话语分析(简称PDA)由J.R.Martin在1999年提出,近年来受到众多学者的关注，相关论文日益涌现。文章阐述了积极话语分析的缘起和研究现状并指出目前研究中存在的问题和今后研究的方向，以期对积极话语分析研究有所借鉴。
积极话语分析(简称PDA)由J.R.Martin在1999年提出,近年来受到众多学者的关注，相关论文日益涌现。文章阐述了积极话语分析的缘起和研究现状并指出目前研究中存在的问题和今后研究的方向，以期对积极话语分析研究有所借鉴。
2023, 39(1): 15-20.
doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022110102
Abstract:
