功能语言学视角下的生态话语分析模式建构——以中国环保部长报告为例

常军芳; 丛迎旭

功能语言学视角下的生态话语分析模式建构——以中国环保部长报告为例

黄河科技学院, 郑州 450000 2. 宁波大学, 宁波 315211

基金项目:

2016年度高校访问学者项目“生态语言学视角下环保话语中的积极隐喻研究(编号为FX2016086)”和浙江省教育厅科研计划项目“环保话语的意义构建：积极隐喻和批评话语分析的双重视角(编号为Y201635643)”的部分研究成果

详细信息

作者简介:
常军芳(1987-),女,河南郑州人,黄河科技学院讲师。

丛迎旭(1976-),男,山东烟台人,宁波大学副教授,硕士生导师。

中图分类号: H0
计量
- 文章访问数: 575
- HTML全文浏览量: 143
- PDF下载量: 24
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-06-20
- 网络出版日期: 2021-06-01

A Multi-stratal Pattern of Ecological Discourse Analysis from a Systemic Functional Perspective: A Case Study on the Speech of China’s Minister of Environment Protection

Huanghe Science and Technology College, Zhengzhou 450000, China;Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China

摘要

摘要: 论文在系统功能语言学视角下，尝试构建包括意识形态、语境和语言本体三个层面的生态话语多层次分析模式，且以该模式对2016年中国环保部长报告进行分析。研究发现，报告内容蕴含了马克思主义生态发展观和共享发展观；语言体现典型的政治语言特色；大量运用语法隐喻；句型基本为陈述句，且主要为祈使句；主位推进模式促进语篇连贯，且广泛使用词汇衔接、连接词及照应这三种衔接手段。多层次分析模式有助于全面深入探讨生态话语的认知功能生成机制，进一步丰富了生态语言学的理论与研究方法。
- 生态话语 /
- 系统功能语言学 /
- 多层面 /
- 环保报告
Abstract: The study tries to construct the multi-stratal analysis pattern of ecological discourse by analyzing the ideology,context and discourse levels from the discourse delivered by China’s minister of environment protection from the systemic functional perspective.The research finds that the ideology in the speech accords with Marxism’s conception of ecological development and that the benefits of growth are broadly shared.The language bears typical political features in which grammatical metaphors, declarative sentences, especially imperative sentences are widely used.Thematic progression, reference, lexical cohesion and conjunction together promote cohesion.The multi-stratal analysis pattern helps to analyze the cognitive and functional generation mechanism of ecological discourse and enrich the ecological linguistics theory.
- ecological discourse /
- multi-stratal /
- systemic functional linguistics /
- speech on environmental protection

HTML全文

参考文献(23)

[1]	Fill, A.Ecolinguistics:state of the art 1998[A].In Fill,A.and Mühlhäusler, P.(eds.).The Ecolinguistics Reader:Language,Ecology and Environment[C].London and New York:Continuum,2001:43-53.
[2]	Halliday,M.A.K.New ways of meaning:the challenge to applied linguistics[J].Journal of Applied Linguistics,1990,(6):7-36.
[3]	Jung, M.Ecological criticism of language[A].In Fill,A.and Mühlhäusler P.(eds.).The Ecolinguistics Reader:Language,Ecology and Environment[C].London and New York:Continuum,2001:270-285.
[4]	Mühlhäusler, P.Language of Environment:Environment of Language:A Course in Ecolinguistics[M].London:Battlebridge,2003.
[5]	王晋军.生态语言学:语言学研究的新视域[J].天津外国语学院学报,2007,(1):53-57.
[6]	陈吉宁.以改善环境质量为核心全力打好补齐环保短板攻坚战[EB/OL].(2016-01-11)[2017-05-06].http://www.gov.cn/guowuyuan/vom/2016-01/15/content_5033089.htm.
[7]	Haugen,E.On the ecology of languages[Z].Talk delivered at a conference at Burg Wartenstein, Austria, 1970.
[8]	辛志英,黄国文.系统功能语言学与生态话语分析 [J].外语教学,2013,(3):7-10.
[9]	黄国文.生态语言学的兴起与发展[J].中国外语,2016,(1):1-5.
[10]	Couto,H.H.Ecological approaches in linguistics:a historical overview [J]. Language Sciences, 2014,(41):125.
[11]	黄国文.从系统功能语言学到生态语言学[J].外语教学,2017, (5):1-7.
[12]	黄国文,赵蕊华.生态话语分析的缘起、目标、原则与方法 [J].现代外语,2017,(5):585-596.
[13]	何伟,魏榕.国际生态话语之及物性分析模式构建[J].现代外语, 2017, (5):597-607.
[14]	赵蕊华.系统功能视角下生态话语分析的多层面模式——以生态报告中银无须鳕鱼身份构建为例 [J].中国外语,2016,(5):84-91.
[15]	Stibbe, A.Ecolinguistics:Language, Ecology and the Sto-ries We Live by[M].London and New York:Taylor & Francis Group,2015.
[16]	Halliday,M.A.K.Language as Social Semiotic:The Social Interpretation ofLanguageand Meaning [M].London:Arnold,1976.Beijing:Beijing Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,2001.
[17]	李忠华.韩礼德的马克思主义语言观[J].山东外语教学,2013,(60):39-48.
[18]	刘晓宇.基于环保视域下的马克思主义自然观解读[J].兰州学刊,2012,(10):206-207.
[19]	Halliday,M.A.K.An Introduction to Functional Grammar(2nd edition)[M].London:Arnold/Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,1994/2000.
[20]	丛迎旭,王红阳.基于语义变化的概念语法隐喻模式与类型 [J].现代外语,2013,(1):33-39.
[21]	丛迎旭.名物化的纯理功能与文体特征[J].北京第二外国语学院学报(外语版),2007,(8):46-50.
[22]	吕叔湘.现代汉语八百词 [M].北京:商务印书馆,1999.
[23]	Halliday, M.A.K. & Hasan, R.Cohesion in English[M].London:Longman,1976.