Legal Adjustment of Investor Protection in Compulsory Delisting

LI Xin-tian; WANG Cheng-hong

Volume 37 Issue 5

Oct. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2021 > 37(5): 543-552

LI Xin-tian, WANG Cheng-hong. Legal Adjustment of Investor Protection in Compulsory Delisting[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(5): 543-552.

Citation:

LI Xin-tian, WANG Cheng-hong. Legal Adjustment of Investor Protection in Compulsory Delisting[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(5): 543-552.

Citation:

PDF( 1016 KB)

Legal Adjustment of Investor Protection in Compulsory Delisting-From the Perspective of CSISC Shareholding Exercise

School of Law, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China

Received Date: 2021-03-19
Available Online: 2021-09-13
Publish Date: 2021-10-25

Abstract

Abstract

In line with the reform of the registration system for stock issuance, China’s delisting system is steadily advancing in the direction of “normalization”. In the process of establishing a normalized delisting mechanism, the mandatory delisting system is clearly the focus of reform at the national regulatory level, and has shown a trend of refinement. However, China’s initiatives on investor protection in the delisting system are lacking and have become a shortcoming that hinders the healthy development of the capital market. In the specific environment of high speculative nature, high turnover rate and many individual investors in China’s capital market, the system mainly composed of early compensation and share buyback is not enough to effectively protect small and medium-sized investors and boost market confidence. In view of this, in the process of improving the mandatory delisting system, the role of CSI Investment Service with unique Chinese characteristics in investor protection should be given full play, with its bonding function between private law enforcement and public regulation as the main line, using the right to collect rights, negotiate agreements, apply for mediation, file lawsuits and other rights granted by the Securities Law, in order to reduce the cost of small and medium-sized investors to defend their rights and strengthen the effect of investor rights protection.
- compulsory delisting,
- investor protection,
- CSISC,
- shareholding for voting program

FullText(HTML)

References(30)

References

[1]	MIRAM H B. Governing corporate compliance[J]. Boston College Law Review, 2009, 3(2):949-961.
[2]	崔文玉. 公司治理的新型机制: 商刑交叉视野下的合规制度[J]. 法商研究,2020,37(6):115-126.
[3]	MARIA H T A T. Changes and trends arising from the Bucharest stock exchange in the need for the analysis of financial instruments at Rompetrol well services PLC[J]. European law review, 2016, 8(1):1-2.
[4]	鲍新则. 论刑事违法性[D]. 上海: 华东政法大学法学院, 2019.
[5]	周光权. 积极刑法立法观在中国的确立[J]. 法学研究,2016,38(4):23-40.
[6]	刘俊海. 现代证券法[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2011.
[7]	曾洋. 创业板公司强制退市路径研究[J]. 证券法苑,2014,13(4):328-350.
[8]	LANGEVOORT D C. Global securities regulation after the financial crisis[J]. Journal of International Economic Law, 2010, 13(3):799-815. doi: 10.1093/jiel/jgq032
[9]	肖宇,黄辉. 证券市场先行赔付: 法理辨析与制度构建[J]. 法学,2019(8):160-172.
[10]	叶必丰. 行政和解和调解: 基于公众参与和诚实信用[J]. 政治与法律,2008(5):2-10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9512.2008.05.001
[11]	潘林. 股份回购中资本规制的展开−基于董事会中心主义的考察[J]. 法商研究,2020,37(4):114-128.
[12]	ERICKSON J. Automating securities class action settlements[J]. Vanderbilt Law Review, 2019, 72(6):1817-1869.
[13]	THAKUR T. Reforming the investor-state dispute settlement mechanism and the host state’s right to regulate: a critical assessment[J]. Indian Journal of International Law, 2021, 59(1-4):173-208. doi: 10.1007/s40901-020-00111-2
[14]	ASPRIS A & MCALPIN L. A cause for alarm? The long-term performance of shareholder class action defendants[J]. Abacus, 2020, 56(2):213-229. doi: 10.1111/abac.12189
[15]	WEBBER D H. Is ‘Pay-to-Play’ driving Public Pension Fund Activism in Securities Class Actions? An empirical study[J]. Ssrn Electronic Journal, 2009, 90(5):2031-2081.
[16]	DONELSON D C, HOPKINS J J & YUST C G. The role of D & O Insurance in Securities Fraud Class Action Settlements[J]. Journal of Law & Economics, 2015, 58(4):748-778.
[17]	SASAKURA H. The Continuing Evolution of Right to Counsel and Confidentiality of Attorney-Client Communications in Japan [M]. Cham: Springer, 2020.
[18]	汪金钗. 先行赔付制度的构建与探索−兼评《证券法》第九十三条[J]. 南方金融,2020(6):91-99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9041.2020.06.009
[19]	海州. 退市制度建设与投资者保护[J]. 证券市场导报,2016(8):1.
[20]	孙宏涛,裴健博. 我国先行赔付制度存在的问题及其完善[J]. 证券法律评论,2020:294-312.
[21]	ENGSTROM D F. Agencies as litigation gatekeepers[J]. Yale Law Journal, 2013, 123(3):616-713.
[22]	石超. 持股行权的法理逻辑与制度取向[J]. 北大法律评论,2019,20(2):177-200.
[23]	ZHONG N, WANG S & YANG R. Does corporate governance enhance common interests of shareholders and primary stakeholders?[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2017, 141(2):411-431. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2702-5
[24]	唐清利. 公权与私权共治的法律机制[J]. 中国社会科学,2016(11):111-128,207-208.
[25]	美浓部达吉. 公法与私法 [M]. 黄冯明, 译. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2003.
[26]	陈新民. 德国公法学基础理论(上)[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2010.
[27]	WAN W Y, CHEN C & GOO S H. Public and private enforcement of corporate and securities laws: an empirical comparison of Hong Kong and Singapore[J]. European Business Organization Law Review, 2019, 20(2):319-361. doi: 10.1007/s40804-019-00129-z
[28]	JACKSON H E & ROE M J. Public and private enforcement of securities laws: resource-based evidence[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2009, 93(2):207-238. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.08.006
[29]	王琳. 投资者权益保护与证券支持诉讼: 以法经济学为视角[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2019,25(4):147-155.
[30]	郭雳,赵轶君. 股东投票代理机构的域外实践与中国启示[J]. 投资者,2018(4):158-174.

Relative Articles

[1]	LI Wei, ZHAO Junbo. Realization Path of Platform Supervision Power in Preventing and Treatment of Cyber-bullying of Minors[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(2): 65-79. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024050129
[2]	LI Wei, KONG Fan-jing. Realization Path of Family Education Rights in Preventing Minors’ Addiction to Internet[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 695-705. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022060029
[3]	YU Wen-qing. The Constitutional Meanings of the Right of Habitation Norms in the Civil Code[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(1): 103-110. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021110011
[4]	YANG Yu-feng. Xing County Activity and Poems of the CI Shi in the Tang Dynasty[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(4): 470-476. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022020051
[5]	ZHANG Rong-fang, YE Zi. An Approach to the Law of Foreign Investment: Reform of South Africa “Protection of Investment Act”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(2): 103-112.
[6]	CHEN Yu-juan, LIU Yu-jie. Appraisers and Attitude Categories in Novels[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(5): 20-27.
[7]	GUO De-xia, WANG Wei, GUO De-hong. On the Responsibility of the “Stakeholders” in the Internship of College Students[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(6): 106-112.
[8]	FU Qiang, LIU Yu-hang. Study of Legal Protection of Privacy in Public Places——From the Angle of Installing Supervising Camera in Public Places[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(4): 103-109.
[9]	LI Xian-wei. the Power of Administrative Adjudication of the ADRs[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(2): 77-83.
[10]	XU Ning-yun. Blend Space: the Translation of “Emergent Meaning” in Poetic Discourse——A Case Study of Two Lines of Verse from William Wordsworth's “The Daffodils”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 7-12.
[11]	WANG Peng. The Influence of Speaker's Sex and Age on Modality Type of COULD in English-Chinese Translation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(3): 119-127.
[12]	GU Xia. From Monologist to Dialogist: Conversion of Teacher's Role[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 149-153.
[13]	TIAN Ye. E-mail Monitoring in Workplace and the Protection of Employees' Right to E-mail Privacy[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 65-71.
[14]	ZHENG Rui-kun, LI Lian-fei. Study on the Liquidate Range of the Securities InvestorsSafeguard Fund[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(3): 72-76.
[15]	FENG Xiao-qing. Research on the Duration of Copyright Protection[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(3): 63-69.
[16]	DONG Mei, LI Wan-ping. Comments on the Legal Protection of Internet Privacy in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(2): 80-83.
[17]	HAN Yin-lan, DU Xiao-zhi. Redefinition of the Equality of Creditor's Rights in the Subrogation Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(3): 33-36.
[18]	WANG Di. On the Enforcement Contest and Its Solution[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(1): 47-55.
[19]	XIAO Jian-guo. On the Nature and the Effect of Civil Enforcement[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(4): 11-18.

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(3)

1.	何平. 我国上市公司违法违规突出问题、监管难点及对策建议. 财政监督. 2025(07): 94-98 .
2.	徐玉德. 国际资本市场退市制度建设的基本经验——以美英日为例. 财会月刊. 2024(12): 3-9 .
3.	侯可欣. 论强制退市制度下中小投资者保护的法律困境与破解. 经济研究导刊. 2022(09): 153-155 .