The Institutional Analysis of the Shortage of Engineering Students’ Practical Skills

LI Ming-chen; GUO De-xia; JIANG Peng

Dec. 2021

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2021 > 37(6): 652-659

LI Ming-chen, GUO De-xia, JIANG Peng. The Institutional Analysis of the Shortage of Engineering Students’ Practical Skills[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(6): 652-659.

Citation:

LI Ming-chen, GUO De-xia, JIANG Peng. The Institutional Analysis of the Shortage of Engineering Students’ Practical Skills[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(6): 652-659.

Citation:

PDF( 887 KB)

The Institutional Analysis of the Shortage of Engineering Students’ Practical Skills

1.
Puxin Limited, Beijing 100086, China
2.
Institute of Educational Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
3.
School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

Received Date: 2021-07-25
Available Online: 2021-11-17
Publish Date: 2021-12-25

Abstract

Abstract

Practice is the fundamental and soul of engineering education, which is the source of engineering students’ engineering consciousness and engineering ability. At present, the engineering students’ practical skills cannot meet the needs of enterprises for engineering talents. The shortages of practical skills correlate with “no engineering” in the evaluation of the universities’ teachers, in the curriculum, and the enterprise practice. Based on the analysis of the above three aspects, the paper puts forward the corresponding improvements of the three following systems: teacher management system, practical teaching system, and internship system.
- engineering students,
- practical skills,
- system

FullText(HTML)

References(17)

References

[1]	诺斯. 制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M]. 刘守英, 译. 上海: 上海三联书店, 1994.
[2]	陈宝泉, 杨晨光. 如何培养好“未来的工程师”[N]. 中国教育报, 2007-10-09(02).
[3]	邹晓东. 科学与工程教育创新—战略、模式与对策[M]. 北京: 科学技术出版社, 2010.
[4]	MARCH J G & OLSEN J P. Rediscovering Institutions[M]. New York: The Free Press, 1989.
[5]	陈劲, 胡建雄. 面向创新型国家的工程教育改革研究[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2006.
[6]	陈希. 着力培养卓越工程师后备人才[N]. 人民日报, 2010-07-09(17).
[7]	宁晓钧,郭德侠,郭艳庆. 面向卓越计划的工程硕士教师工程实践能力提升制度研究[J]. 中国冶金教育,2014(6):40-44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-0958.2014.06.015
[8]	陈国松. 我国重点大学本科工程教育实践教学改革研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2012.
[9]	赵洁婷. “新工科”背景下能力导向型冶金专业实践教学体系构建[J]. 中国冶金教育,2021(3):76-79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-0958.2021.03.023
[10]	王梅. 产教融合促进高职新工科专业劳动教育的实践与研究[J]. 工业技术与职业教育,2021,19(3):55-58.
[11]	保罗·A·萨巴蒂尔著. 政策过程理论[M]. 彭宗超, 钟开斌等译. 北京: 三联书店, 2006.
[12]	郭振威,诸葛致,吴军科. 高校卓越工程师工程实践能力的培养研究[J]. 科技与创新,2021(8):151-152, 155.
[13]	郭德侠,曲绍卫. 大学工科教师技能性知识获得的三条进路—基于教师专业发展的视角[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,37(3):227-232.
[14]	王章豹,石芳娟. 从工程哲学视角看未来工程师的素质[J]. 自然辩证法,2008(7):63-68.
[15]	NTU URECA Organization. About URECA [EB/OL]. (2017-10-20)[2021-07-22].https://www.ntu.edu.sg/education/undergraduate-research-experience-on-campus-(ureca).
[16]	毕华林,鲁欢欢. 近30年美国科学课程内容变化特点与启示−基于科学素养的视角[J]. 课程. 教材. 教法,2020,40(7):137-143.
[17]	关于产教融合的一些思考[EB/OL]. (2017-06-22) [2021-09-13]. http://www.360doc.com/content/17/0622/21/33281137_665618948.shtml.