Volume 43 Issue 6
Dec.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
He Bing, Huang Xianxiong. The Normative Implications and Application of the Principle of Reliance Protection in the Private Sector Promotion Law[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 42(6): 124-135. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2025090011
Citation: He Bing, Huang Xianxiong. The Normative Implications and Application of the Principle of Reliance Protection in the Private Sector Promotion Law[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 42(6): 124-135. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2025090011

The Normative Implications and Application of the Principle of Reliance Protection in the Private Sector Promotion Law

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2025090011
  • Received Date: 2025-10-03
  • Publish Date: 2026-12-01
  • Relying on governmental acts and official information, private economic organizations build reasonable expectations about their operational conditions and developmental objectives. This reliance and its interests should be given key recognition and protection by law. Although the Private Sector Promotion Law stipulates reliance protection through individual provisions, in terms of its normative basis and specific application scenarios, it still faces inherent tensions between administrative flexibility and law-based administration, difficulties in identifying non-typical reliance bases, imbalance in compensation and indemnification for reliance losses, and the nominal application of judicial review. There are also problems of theoretical system and normative practice not being highly compatible. The principle of reliance protection should be regarded as a core principle in promoting the private economy, constraining the arbitrary exercise of administrative power, balancing the flexibility of administrative power and law-based administration conflicts, and protecting the legitimate expectations of private economic organizations. The application of reliance protection clauses is a key link in transforming the private economy from policy dividends to institutional dividends. Therefore, focusing on the normative implications of reliance protection clauses, the practical difficulties and deep causes of their application, and proceeding from dimensions such as clause interpretation and coordination with relevant laws and regulations, norms for the exercise of administrative power, and strengthening judicial review, this paper aims to construct a clear and highly operational reliance protection norm and practice system to provide substantive and fair administrative law protection for the reliance interests of private economic organizations.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    吴如巧, 殷石. 论《民营经济促进法》的立法价值导向与制度实现逻辑[J/OL]. 成都理工大学学报(社会科学版) (2025-09-30) [2025-09-30]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/51.1641.C.20250929.1621.025.
    [2]
    习近平出席民营企业座谈会并发表重要讲话[EB/OL]. 央视新闻 (2025-02-17) [2025-08-12]. https://news.cctv.com/2025/02/17/ARTIQTZjVIviTerk4vlor55s250217.shtml.
    [3]
    陈云良, 李媛. 民营经济高质量发展的产权保护[J]. 学习与实践, 2025(6): 35-44. doi: 10.19624/j.cnki.cn42-1005/c.2025.06.004
    [4]
    倪弋. 民营经济促进法草案提请审议 持续优化民营经济发展环境[N]. 人民日报, 2024-12-22(4).
    [5]
    刘华东. 民营经济促进法草案提交全国人大常委会二审[N]. 光明日报, 2025-02-25(3).
    [6]
    贺荣. 关于《中华人民共和国民营经济促进法(草案)》的说明: 2024年12月21日在第十四届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第十三次会议上[J]. 中华人民共和国全国人民代表大会常务委员会公报, 2025(3): 348-350.
    [7]
    尤广宇. 刑法保护社会信用的应然立场与实现路径[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 40(6): 91-100. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023110106
    [8]
    邢军. 中国法学会副会长王利明接受《人民法治》记者专访: 民营经济促进法出台的重大意义[J]. 人民法治, 2025(10): 6-9.
    [9]
    为新时代新征程民营经济持续、健康、高质量发展提供坚实法治保障: 全国人大常委会法工委负责人就民营经济促进法答记者问[EB/OL]. (2025-04-30) [2025-08-12]. https://www.moj.gov.cn/pub/sfbgw/zcjd/202504/t20250430_518384.html.
    [10]
    谭冰霖. 促进民营经济高质量发展的行政法治之维[EB/OL]. (2025-05-16) [2025-08-12]. https://www.acfic.org.cn/ztzlhz/myjjcjf/myjjcjf_pljd/202505/t20250516_313533.html.
    [11]
    张昊. 让公平正义可预期看得见有温度: 代表委员眼中的新时代推动法治进程2023年度十大案件[N]. 法治日报, 2024-03-04(1).
    [12]
    姜秉曦. 法不溯及既往的宪法意涵及其界限[J]. 清华法学, 2024, 18(1): 172-190.
    [13]
    赵贵龙. 论“信赖保护原则”司法审查标准的规则创制[J]. 中国应用法学, 2021(5): 89-108.
    [14]
    黄智杰. 论行政诉讼情况判决中的信赖利益保护[J]. 苏州大学学报(法学版), 2025, 12(1): 114-124. doi: 10.19563/j.cnki.sdfx.2025.01.010
    [15]
    沈福俊, 周帆帆. 跨区域行政处罚裁量权基准的法治逻辑[J]. 行政法学研究, 2025(6): 177-192.
    [16]
    展鹏贺. 德国公法上信赖保护规范基础的变迁: 基于法教义学的视角[J]. 法学评论, 2018, 36(3): 134-151. doi: 10.13415/j.cnki.fxpl.2018.03.013
    [17]
    汪燕. 选择性执法的法律属性探析[J]. 政治与法律, 2013(5): 113-120. doi: 10.15984/j.cnki.1005-9512.2013.05.010
    [18]
    习近平在民营经济组织座谈会上的讲话[EB/OL]. (2018-11-01) [2025-08-12]. https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2018/content_5341047.htm.
    [19]
    工业和信息化部火炬高技术产业开发中心. 缓解小微企业融资难、融资贵问题的政策建议[J]. 火炬学报, 2018(183). http://www.chinatorch.gov.cn/hjdw/xxyd/201801/205a3b62f4d84b25a147d1cc5255fdb0.shtml.
    [20]
    孙丽岩. 信赖保护与相对人授益权的实现[J]. 政法论坛, 2007(3): 106-113.
    [21]
    国务院关于清理规范税收等优惠政策的通知(国发〔2014〕62号)[EB/OL]. (2014-12-09) [2025-08-12]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2014-12/09/content_9295.htm.
    [22]
    王子晨. 行政法上信赖保护原则的具体化[J]. 环球法律评论, 2024, 46(2): 124-139. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6728.2024.02.009
    [23]
    周维峰. 论行政法信赖保护原则[J]. 政法论丛, 2003(2): 75-78.
    [24]
    Elliott M. Legitimate expectations: procedure, substance, policy and proportionality [J]. The Cambridge Law Journal, 2006, 65(2): 254-256.
    [25]
    廖望, 李闻, 唐雪松. 地方政府欠款治理的社会效应: 基于民营企业社会责任承担的视角[J]. 当代财经, 2024(11): 84-97. doi: 10.13676/j.cnki.cn36-1030/f.20240914.003
    [26]
    李会勋, 赵美玉. 行政协议单方变更解除权的规范行使研究[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 40(1): 114-123. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023020116
    [27]
    王贵松. 行政信赖保护论[M]. 济南: 山东人民出版社, 2007.
    [28]
    左卫民. 省统管法院人财物: 剖析与前瞻[J]. 法学评论, 2016, 34(3): 1-7. doi: 10.13415/j.cnki.fxpl.2016.03.001
    [29]
    黄先雄. 行政首次判断权理论及其适用[J]. 行政法学研究, 2017(5): 113-123.
    [30]
    宋承恩. 信赖保护原则的实质面向: 英国法之启发[J]. 月旦法学, 2002(4): 272-286.
    [31]
    胡敏洁. 行政规定变迁中的信赖利益保护研究[J]. 江苏行政学院学报, 2011(5): 131-136. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8860.2011.05.020
    [32]
    Fishman W L. Property rights, reliance, and retrospectivity under the communications act of 1934 [J]. Federal Communications Law Journal, 1997, 50(1): 1-52.
    [33]
    张兴祥. 行政法合法预期保护原则研究[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2006.
    [34]
    沈岿. “正当信赖”的衡平检验[J]. 中国法学, 2025(4): 107-126. doi: 10.14111/j.cnki.zgfx.2025.04.006
    [35]
    刘飞. 行政法中信赖保护原则的适用要件: 以授益行为的撤销与废止为基点的考察[J]. 比较法研究, 2022(4): 128-141.
    [36]
    崔建远. 合同法总论(上卷)[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2008.
    [37]
    朱李圣. 《民法典》第476条(要约之可撤销性及其限制)评注[J]. 法学家, 2024(2): 173-190, 196. doi: 10.16094/j.cnki.1005-0221.2024.02.009
    [38]
    陈金钊, 左飞. 论利益衡量规则[J]. 河北法学, 2025, 43(5): 18-38. doi: 10.16494/j.cnki.1002-3933.2025.05.002
    [39]
    行政法与行政诉讼法学编写组. 行政法与行政诉讼法学 [M]. 2版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2018.
    [40]
    戚建刚, 王兆鑫. 违法建筑行政裁判中信赖保护原则之适用: 以308份裁判文书为考察对象[J]. 华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023(3): 126-138. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1398.2023.03.012
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (0) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return