Volume 43 Issue 4
Aug.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Tong Xinghai. Regulations of High-Frequency Quantitative Trading in the Era of Artificial Intelligence[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 42(4): 109-118. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2025060076
Citation: Tong Xinghai. Regulations of High-Frequency Quantitative Trading in the Era of Artificial Intelligence[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 42(4): 109-118. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2025060076

Regulations of High-Frequency Quantitative Trading in the Era of Artificial Intelligence

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2025060076
  • Received Date: 2025-06-18
    Available Online: 2026-05-15
  • Publish Date: 2026-08-25
  • Quantitative trading firms complete short-term speculative trading through their high-frequency arbitrage transactions, shifting from company information analysis to market liquidity analysis. They can make profits in short-term zero-sum games without relying on company financial analysis, achieving a transition from “financialized” approaches to “AI-driven” methodologies. Although artificial intelligence has endowed quantitative trading with new strategies, granting it a disproportionate lead over human traders in short-term market competition, it runs counter to technological humanism and affects the stability of the securities market. To achieve the healthy development of the securities market and fair competition among investors, the regulatory logic of the securities market in the era of artificial intelligence should shift from information disclosure to trading structure, and a regulatory system for new risks of quantitative trading should be improved. The transparency of algorithms should be enhanced, high-frequency trading should be appropriately restricted, and dynamic responsive regulations that go beyond the technological neutrality of algorithms should be adopted. Market-acquisitive quantitative trading should be identified as market manipulation behavior and punished in accordance with the Securities Law.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    高瑞卿. 人工智能在金融量化领域的应用研究[N]. 市场信息报, 2024-12-30(13).
    [2]
    Homeland Security, Governmental Affairs. Hedge Fund Use of AI Report [EB/OL]. (2024-06-11) [2025-03-03]. https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024.06.11-Hedge-Fund-Use-of-AI-Report.pdf.
    [3]
    Yadav Y. How algorithmic trading undermines efficiency in capital markets [J]. Vanderbilt Law Review, 2015(68): 1607-1672.
    [4]
    Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. 2025 FINRA Annual Regulatory Oversight Report [EB/OL]. (2025-01-28) [2025-06-27]. https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/guidance/reports/2025-finra-annual-regulatory-oversight-report.
    [5]
    罗勇, 卢洪波. GPT时代的量化交易: 底层逻辑与技术实践[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2023.
    [6]
    曹凤岐, 刘力, 姚长辉. 证券投资学[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2013.
    [7]
    托尼·吉达. 大数据、机器学习与量化投资[M]. 徐照宜, 薛扬荣, 陈宇翔, 译. 北京: 中信出版社, 2023.
    [8]
    宋逢明. 金融工程原理: 无套利均衡分析[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 1999.
    [9]
    王征, 李晓波. 人工智能在量化交易中的应用与实战[M]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社有限公司, 2019.
    [10]
    邹开亮, 徐培杰, 曾文琴. 算法个性化定价的规制困境与纾解进路[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2026, 42(2): 72-79.
    [11]
    斯科特·帕特森. 暗池: 高频交易及人工智能大盗颠覆金融世界的对决[M]. 孙豪, 王泽宪, 李骥宇, 等, 译. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2015.
    [12]
    Yagi I, Masuda Y, Mizuta T. Analysis of the impact of high-frequency trading on artificial market liquidity [J]. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 2020, 7(6): 1332-1334.
    [13]
    Thompson P A. Invested interests? reflexivity, representation and reporting in financial markets [J]. Journalism, 2013, 14(2): 208-227.
    [14]
    Jacobs B I. Momentum trading: the new alchemy [J]. Journal of Investing, 2000, 9(4): 6-7.
    [15]
    张家林. 证券投资人工智能: 人工智能时代的财富管理变革[M]. 北京: 中国经济出版社, 2017.
    [16]
    聂国庆, 钱玉文. 证券特别代表人诉讼选案机制的反思与重构[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2026, 42(2): 92-104.
    [17]
    Gerner-beuerle C. Algorithmic trading and the limits of securities regulation [M]// Digital Finance in Europe: Law, Regulation, and Governance. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2022: 114-115.
    [18]
    何天翔. 超越技术中立: 高频交易算法的法律规制[J]. 南方金融, 2024(10): 87-100.
    [19]
    Currie W L, Seddon J J J M, Vliet V B. From decision optimization to satisficing: regulation of automated trading in the US financial markets [J]. Information & Management, 2022, 59(8): 1-11.
    [20]
    缪因知. 信息型操纵市场行为执法标准研究[J]. 清华法学, 2019, 13(6): 159-176.
    [21]
    Carroll M, Chan A, Ashton H, et al. Characterizing manipulation from AI systems [C]// Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023: 1-13.
    [22]
    樊健. 禁止操纵证券市场的理论基础: 法律与金融的分析[J]. 财经法学, 2022(3): 110-127.
    [23]
    李华林. 莫让AI成为操纵市场的工具[N]. 经济日报, 2025-02-27(7).
    [24]
    徐文鸣. 证券事中事后监管活动的实证分析——基于回应性执法理论的视角[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022(5): 71-81.
    [25]
    吕桐弢. 人工智能时代程序化交易监管的制度完善[J]. 现代经济探讨, 2023(2): 122-132.
    [26]
    李贤森, 李庭凯. 论人工智能系统法律风险规制——以欧盟《人工智能法》为例[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 41(5): 86-102.
    [27]
    Coombs N. What is an algorithm? financial regulation in the era of high-frequency trading [J]. Economy and Society, 2016, 45(2): 278-302.
    [28]
    Koshiyama A, Firoozye N, Treleaven P. Algorithms in Future Capital Markets [EB/OL]. [2025-06-27]. https://dl.acm.org/doi/epdf/10.1145/3383455.3422539.
    [29]
    孙宝玲. 操纵市场类型化认定的理论审思与制度构造[J]. 财经法学, 2024(2): 116-130.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (0) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return