Research on the Influencing Factors of the Effectiveness of Collaborative Education between Ideological and Political Theory Course Teachers and Counselors in Universities

Zhang Feng; Zhang Xian; Liu Danhe

doi:10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2025060021

Volume 43 Issue 5

Oct. 2026

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2026 > 42(5): 71-83

Zhang Feng, Zhang Xian, Liu Danhe. Research on the Influencing Factors of the Effectiveness of Collaborative Education between Ideological and Political Theory Course Teachers and Counselors in Universities[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 42(5): 71-83. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2025060021

Citation:

Zhang Feng, Zhang Xian, Liu Danhe. Research on the Influencing Factors of the Effectiveness of Collaborative Education between Ideological and Political Theory Course Teachers and Counselors in Universities[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 42(5): 71-83. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2025060021

Citation:

Zhang Feng, Zhang Xian, Liu Danhe. Research on the Influencing Factors of the Effectiveness of Collaborative Education between Ideological and Political Theory Course Teachers and Counselors in Universities[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 42(5): 71-83. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2025060021

PDF( 1260 KB)

Research on the Influencing Factors of the Effectiveness of Collaborative Education between Ideological and Political Theory Course Teachers and Counselors in Universities

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2025060021

1.
School of Education, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
2.
Academic Journal Center, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

Received Date: 2025-06-05
Available Online: 2026-06-29
Publish Date: 2026-10-25

Abstract

Abstract

Collaborative education between ideological and political theory course teachers and counselors in universities serves as a strategic measure to deepen the integration of ideological and political theory courses with daily ideological and political education, and also acts as a key link in advancing the integration of ideological and political education in universities. To thoroughly explore and clarify the influencing factors of the effectiveness of collaborative education of the two groups, break down coordination barriers and optimize collaborative operation mechanisms, this study conducted a questionnaire survey among 246 ideological and political theory course teachers and 269 counselors from 86 universities nationwide, and adopted hierarchical regression analysis to test the influencing factors of the effectiveness of collaborative education of the two groups. The results show that the overall level of collaborative education between ideological and political theory course teachers and counselors is favorable. Both groups exhibit distinct characteristics in their educational practices, and the levels of various dimensions of collaborative education show significant differences in terms of gender, age, institutional level, communication frequency and platform construction. Meanwhile, educational capability, functional positioning, willingness to collaborate, educational methods and institutional environment are identified as key factors influencing the effectiveness of collaborative education. Based on these results, recommendations are proposed: reforming the educational institutional system to deepen the integration of ideological and political education with talent cultivation; constructing smart ideological and political platforms to optimize communication mechanisms; precisely defining the functions of counselors to strengthen identity recognition; and deeply understanding teachers’ differences to stimulate motivation for collaboration. These measures aim to achieve qualitative improvements and sustained development in collaborative education outcomes.
- ideological and political theory course teachers in universities,
- counselors,
- collaborative education,
- influencing factors

FullText(HTML)

References(28)

References

[1]	新华社. 习近平出席全国高校思想政治工作会议并发表重要讲话[EB/OL]. (2016-12-08) [2025-06-20]. https://www.xuexi.cn/746bd106b7d5dca0bc01f747f5bf37c0/e43e220633a65f9b6d8b53712cba9caa.html.
[2]	中华人民共和国教育部. 新时代高等学校思想政治理论课教师队伍建设规定[EB/OL]. (2020-01-16)[2025-06-20]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A02/s5911/moe_621/202002/t20200207_418877.html.
[3]	中华人民共和国教育部. 教育部等十部门关于印发《全面推进“大思政课”建设的工作方案》的通知[EB/OL]. (2022-08-10) [2025-06-20]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A13/moe_772/202208/t20220818_653672.html.
[4]	胡绪明. 高校思政课教师与辅导员协同育人的功能定位及实施对策[J]. 学术论坛, 2018, 41(4): 174-180.
[5]	王敏, 徐露璐. 大学生日常思想政治教育与思想政治理论课教学的协同性思考[J]. 大学教育, 2016(2): 56-58.
[6]	王秀玉, 何正玲. 高校辅导员与思想政治理论课教师合力育人机制模式探讨[J]. 辽宁工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 20(1): 98-100, 103.
[7]	李丹. 学校导向的产学研协同育人影响因素及对策研究[J]. 黑龙江科学, 2019, 10(1): 36-37.
[8]	钟贞山, 王磊. 高职产教融合协同育人共同体建设的影响因素分析: 基于扎根理论的研究[J]. 职教论坛, 2022, 38(4): 120-128.
[9]	沈壮海, 王迎迎. 2016年度大学生思想政治教育状况调查分析: 基于全国35所高校的调查[J]. 中国高等教育, 2017(11): 45-50.
[10]	司文超. 高校思想政治教育成效及其影响因素的调查分析[J]. 思想理论教育, 2022(1): 101-105.
[11]	杨成兵, 秦宗槐, 陈晓燕. 新时代高校思政课教师与辅导员协同育人影响因素研究[J]. 就业与保障, 2022(3): 34-36.
[12]	董凌莉. 理想信念教育视域下应用型高校实践育人探究[J]. 学校党建与思想教育, 2020(14): 68-70. doi: 10.19865/j.cnki.xxdj.2020.14.022
[13]	Mêgnigbêto E. Modelling the triple helix of university-industry-government relationships with game theory: core, shapley value and nucleolus as indicators of synergy within an innovation system [J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2018, 12(4): 1118-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.005
[14]	Bush A, Grotjohann N. Collaboration in teacher education: a cross-sectional study on future teachers’ attitudes towards collaboration, their intentions to collaborate and their performance of collaboration [J/OL]. Teaching and Teacher Education (2019-11-14) [2025-03-04]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X19302203.
[15]	Malin H. American identity development and citizenship education: a summary of perspectives and call for new research [J]. Applied Developmental Science, 2011, 15(2): 111-116. doi: 10.1080/10888691.2011.560817
[16]	Hemmert M, Bstieler L, Okamuro H. Bridging the cultural divide: trust formation in university–industry research collaborations in the US, Japan, and South Korea [J]. Technovation, 2014, 34(10): 605-616. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2014.04.006
[17]	Albet M S, Nasikhin N, Fihris F. Implementation and challenges of discipline character education [J]. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 2024, 15(2): 120-124. doi: 10.21831/jpka.v15i2.77799
[18]	王思斌. 社会学教程: 第5版[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2021.
[19]	赫尔曼·哈肯. 协同学: 大自然构成的奥秘[M]. 凌复华, 译. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 2005.
[20]	客洪刚. 高校辅导员队伍与思政课教师队伍交流机制研究[J]. 教育科学, 2011, 27(6): 70-73.
[21]	马聪, 刘娜. 精准思政视域下“四位一体”协同育人模式研究实践[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 40(4): 26-32. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023110006
[22]	于杨, 王利锋, 金祥雷. 新时代大学教师转型发展: 挑战与对策[J]. 中国大学教学, 2021(6): 72-76.
[23]	吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务: SPSS操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010.
[24]	张大均, 朱政光. 大学生心理素质的特点和影响因素: 基于对大学生线上调查数据的分析[J]. 教育研究, 2022, 43(7): 126-139.
[25]	万美容, 曾兰. 90后女大学生心理特点的实证研究: 基于与男大学生的比较[J]. 中国青年研究, 2014(4): 67-72. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9931.2014.04.013
[26]	敖永春, 何祖娜. 大数据时代高校精准思政的价值意蕴、矛盾境遇与实施路径[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 41(2): 13-19.
[27]	朱俊英, 王群. 加强高校辅导员自我认同的研究[J]. 思想理论教育, 2015(10): 108-111.
[28]	李苏, 顾友仁. 数字技术赋能思政教育实效提升的三维理路[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2026, 42(3): 53-59. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024110002