Volume 42 Issue 2
Apr.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WEN Shuwan, XUE Ninglan. The Value Basis, Interpretation and Application of the Property Division Rules in Non-marital Cohabitation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 42(2): 80-91. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2025040028
Citation: WEN Shuwan, XUE Ninglan. The Value Basis, Interpretation and Application of the Property Division Rules in Non-marital Cohabitation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 42(2): 80-91. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2025040028

The Value Basis, Interpretation and Application of the Property Division Rules in Non-marital Cohabitation

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2025040028
  • Received Date: 2025-04-11
  • Publish Date: 2026-04-01
  • Non-marital cohabitation has gradually become a more common form of intimate relationship in society. It is a value choice for the law to select some of the de facto cohabitation relationships for evaluation; its legitimacy is based on the equality of legal regulation and the realization of legal values, but the appropriate boundaries should still be grasped with reference to the marital relationship, and demonstrate varying degrees of significance in gender relations, property relations, and parent-child relations. Article 4 of the Interpretation (II) of the Marriage and Family Part has constructed the property division rules in non-marital cohabitation in response to practical needs. In dealing with disputes over the division of property in non-marital cohabitation, the value principles should differ from those of the marital property system and property law, respecting the freedom of will and the protection of the family by the state. In the application of the rules, it is necessary to make a reasonable distinction between disputes over the division of property in cohabitation relationship, disputes over the division of property in divorce and disputes over betrothal property, accurately identify “non-marital cohabitation”, “cohabitation period” and the internal application logic of the rules, and to understand the determination and treatment of debts in non-marital cohabitation from the perspective of systematic interpretation. In addition, the adjudicators can still refer to the application of the rules on compensation for domestic labor in marriage and family based on the litigation request of the parties in disputes over the division of property in non-marital cohabitation.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    侯学宾, 潘国瑞. 非婚同居中财产给付性质的裁判逻辑[J]. 法律适用, 2022(10): 45-56.
    [2]
    夏吟兰. 论婚姻家庭法在民法典体系中的相对独立性[J]. 法学论坛, 2014, 29(4): 5-14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4379.2018.28.115
    [3]
    童付章, 吴素文. 非婚同居关系的立法趋势与我国的法律对策[J]. 江西社会科学, 2007(2): 195-198.
    [4]
    徐婧. 从“亲权”到“亲责”: 家庭教育的司法介入[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 41(2): 97-106. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024010067
    [5]
    张文显. 法理学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2018.
    [6]
    欧阳陈宇. 同居关系的法律调整: 事实与规范之间[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 27(2): 104-114.
    [7]
    张亮. 从约会到同居: “他的”和“她的”同居决策比较——基于“90后”流动青年同居者的质性研究[J]. 妇女研究论丛, 2020(2): 34-44.
    [8]
    何丽新. 论事实婚姻与非婚同居的二元化规制[J]. 比较法研究, 2009(2): 59-69.
    [9]
    徐涤宇. 历史视野下夹缠于非婚和婚姻之间的事实婚——兼论我国未来民法典对事实婚的应然构建[J]. 法学评论, 2016, 34(3): 185-191. doi: 10.13415/j.cnki.fxpl.2016.03.019
    [10]
    杨立新. 论准婚姻关系[J]. 中州学刊, 2005(6): 92-96. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-472X.2016.03.007
    [11]
    鲁晓明. 老龄社会婚姻规则多元论[J]. 法学研究, 2023, 45(2): 67-82.
    [12]
    赵秀荣. 社会性别视野下妇女的婚姻家庭权利[J]. 苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2011, 32(2): 98-101.
    [13]
    刘颖, 谢妮轩. 亲子关系异议之诉的解释论展开——以〈民法典〉第一千零七十三条为中心[J]. 河南财经政法大学学报, 2023, 38(6): 114-125.
    [14]
    赵玉. 婚姻家庭法中的利他主义[J]. 社会科学战线, 2018(10): 202-216.
    [15]
    李霞. 民法亲属编三题[J]. 山东社会科学, 2004(8): 51-55, 87. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4145.2004.08.014
    [16]
    王坤. 女性在非婚同居中损害的法律救济[J]. 河北法学, 2009, 27(7): 146-149.
    [17]
    冉克平. 论“婚姻家庭受国家保护”原则[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2024, 42(1): 180-191. doi: 10.16290/j.cnki.1674-5205.2024.01.014
    [18]
    黄薇. 中华人民共和国民法典婚姻家庭编释义[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2020.
    [19]
    史尚宽. 亲属法论[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2000.
    [20]
    于志强. 中国家庭转型的现代化实践及其国家形塑[J]. 社会科学研究, 2024(5): 139-147. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4769.2024.05.015
    [21]
    龙翼飞. 习近平法治思想引领下的《民法典婚姻家庭编解释(二)》解读[J]. 中国应用法学, 2025(1): 27-41.
    [22]
    金眉. 民法典体系下婚约性质之辨[J]. 政法论坛, 2022, 40(6): 113-124.
    [23]
    薛宁兰, 崔丹. 论彩礼的给付性质与返还规则[J]. 妇女研究论丛, 2024(5): 87-98.
    [24]
    陈苇, 王薇. 我国设立非婚同居法的社会基础及制度构想[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2008(1): 28-33. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3637.2008.01.010
    [25]
    向东, 赵娜萍. 关系契约视角下家庭制度的重构——以非婚同居为例[J]. 河北法学, 2017, 35(2): 103-112.
    [26]
    吴真. “个体化”之困: 当代法国家庭研究的疑义与论争[J]. 2021, 41(2): 1-26.
    [27]
    梁慧星. 民商法论丛(第23卷)[M]. 香港: 金桥文化出版有限公司, 2002.
    [28]
    杨彪, 林艳祺. 非婚同居中的家务劳动补偿请求权[J]. 政治与法律, 2020(12): 95-106.
    [29]
    王素云. 非婚同居财产关系新论[J]. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2009(4): 134-138. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9142.2009.04.022
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (17) PDF downloads(2) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return