Examination and Mitigation of Ideological Risks of ChatGPT-like Artificial Intelligence

Luo Teng; Wang Yongyou

doi:10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2025010020

Volume 43 Issue 4

Aug. 2026

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2026 > 42(4): 28-39

Luo Teng, Wang Yongyou. Examination and Mitigation of Ideological Risks of ChatGPT-like Artificial Intelligence[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 42(4): 28-39. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2025010020

Citation:

Luo Teng, Wang Yongyou. Examination and Mitigation of Ideological Risks of ChatGPT-like Artificial Intelligence[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2026, 42(4): 28-39. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2025010020

Citation:

PDF( 916 KB)

Examination and Mitigation of Ideological Risks of ChatGPT-like Artificial Intelligence

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2025010020

Luo Teng¹,
Wang Yongyou²

1.
School of Marxism, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China
2.
School of Marxism, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China

Received Date: 2025-01-04
Available Online: 2026-05-15
Publish Date: 2026-08-01

Abstract

Abstract

With the gradual promotion and deep application of ChatGPT-like artificial intelligence, the ideological field has shown a new picture characterized by the concealment of political intentions, multidimensional modes of action, blurred field boundaries, and autonomous content generation, presenting new features of the marked increase in the concealment, openness, pervasiveness and complexity of ideological risks. Analyzing from multiple dimensions, such as politics, capital, technology, and subjects, it is found that political embedding, capital control, ubiquitous interconnection and human-machine mutual shaping are the underlying causes of ideological risks. Based on this, value attributes should be reshaped by mainstream values, capital manipulation should be regulated by institutional construction, intelligent technology should be standardized by technical ethics, and human-machine relations should be governed by co-regulation of human intelligence, so as to better mitigate the ideological risks of ChatGPT-like artificial intelligence.
- ChatGPT,
- generative artificial intelligence,
- ideological risks,
- technology

FullText(HTML)

References(43)

References

[1]	张熙, 杨小汕, 徐常胜. ChatGPT及生成式人工智能现状及未来发展方向[J]. 中国科学基金, 2023, 37(5): 743-750. doi: 10.16262/j.cnki.1000-8217.20231026.002
[2]	尤尔根·哈贝马斯. 作为“意识形态”的技术与科学[M]. 李黎, 郭官义, 译. 上海: 学林出版社, 1999.
[3]	Inhofe M J. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 [EB/OL]. (2022-12-23)[2025-03-25]. https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ263/PLAW-117publ263.pdf.
[4]	张夏恒. ChatGPT的逻辑解构、影响研判及政策建议[J]. 新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 44(5): 113-123. doi: 10.14100/j.cnki.65-1039/g4.20230224.002
[5]	温晓年. ChatGPT的意识形态风险审视[J]. 西北民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023(4): 99-108. doi: 10.3979/1673-8268.20240627002
[6]	代金平, 覃杨杨. ChatGPT等生成式人工智能的意识形态风险及其应对[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 29(5): 101-110.
[7]	向继友, 吴学琴. ChatGPT类生成式人工智能的意识形态风险及其防控策略[J]. 江汉论坛, 2023(12): 53-59. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-854X.2023.12.007
[8]	方旭. 从ChatGPT看人工智能时代意识形态领域运作表征与风险防范[J]. 毛泽东邓小平理论研究, 2023(5): 35-44, 108.
[9]	王延川, 赵靖. 生成式人工智能诱发意识形态风险的逻辑机理及其应对策略[J]. 河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 50(4): 1-7.
[10]	孙会岩. 新一代人工智能技术的网络意识形态问题及其应对——以ChatGPT为例[J]. 毛泽东邓小平理论研究, 2023(5): 45-53, 108.
[11]	张夏恒. ChatGPT的政治社会动能、风险及防范[J]. 深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2023, 40(3): 5-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-260X.2023.03.002
[12]	马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯全集: 第42卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2016.
[13]	吴胜锋. 马克思主义意识理论视域下的人工智能技术批判[J]. 哲学动态, 2019(4): 26-33.
[14]	高亮华. 人文主义视野中的技术[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 1997.
[15]	Maslej N, Fattorini L, Perrault R, et al. Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2024 [EB/OL]. (2024-04-26)[2026-03-16]. https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2024-ai-index-report?queryID=24f52c6869bc1a8481afcc887ce91058.
[16]	WIPO. Patent Landscape Report: Generative Artificial Intelligence [EB/OL]. (2024-07-03)[2025-03-20]. https://tind.wipo.int/record/49740/files/wipo-pub-2007-en-generative-ai.pdf?ln=en.
[17]	王少. ChatGPT介入思想政治教育的技术线路、安全风险及防范[J]. 深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2023, 40(2): 153-160. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-260X.2023.02.016
[18]	钱力, 刘熠, 张智雄, 等. ChatGPT的技术基础分析[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2023, 7(3): 6-15. doi: 10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2023.0229
[19]	本报评论部. 用主流价值纾解“算法焦虑”[N]. 人民日报, 2018-06-20(5).
[20]	Dilmegani C. Generative AI ethics: how to manage them [EB/OL]. (2026-01-21)[2026-03-17]. https://research.aimultiple.com/generative-ai-ethics/.
[21]	程海东, 王以梁, 侯沐辰. 人工智能的不确定性及其治理探究[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2020, 36(2): 36-41. doi: 10.19484/j.cnki.1000-8934.20200219.010
[22]	邹开亮, 刘祖兵. ChatGPT的伦理风险与中国因应制度安排[J]. 海南大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2023, 41(4): 74-84.
[23]	Langdon W. The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1989.
[24]	朱尉, 高强. ChatGPT对美国两党和中美两国的政治偏见及意识形态风险[J]. 阅江学刊, 2025, 17(1): 102-118, 173. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7089.2025.01.010
[25]	卡尔·曼海姆. 意识形态与乌托邦[M]. 黎鸣, 李书崇, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2000.
[26]	大卫·哈维. 新帝国主义[M]. 付克新, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2019.
[27]	黄雅卓. 算法技术赋能政府职责体系构建及其限度[J]. 天津行政学院学报, 2023, 25(3): 34-42. doi: 10.16326/j.cnki.1008-7168.2023.03.004
[28]	赵友华. 人工智能时代优化民生政治参与的算法逻辑[J]. 宁夏社会科学, 2019(5): 49-57.
[29]	陈智, 陈昊. 可供性视角下ChatGPT的赋能效用及其风险透视[J]. 情报杂志, 2023, 42(7): 131-139. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1965.2023.07.019
[30]	孙伟平. 人工智能与人的“新异化”[J]. 中国社会科学, 2020(12): 119-137, 202-203.
[31]	张家军, 陈苗. 回归育人价值: 数字全景敞视下教育规训隐忧的消解路径[J]. 现代远程教育研究, 2021(4): 33-42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5195.2021.04.004
[32]	马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯文集: 第1卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009.
[33]	党永强. 追寻自我: 现代性自我认同的危与机[J]. 同济大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 31(5): 94-102, 113. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3060.2020.05.010
[34]	刘易斯·芒福德. 技术与文明[M]. 陈允明, 王克仁, 李华山, 等, 译. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2009.
[35]	赫伯特·马尔库塞. 单向度的人[M]. 刘继, 译. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 1989.
[36]	吴倩倩. 论智能算法技术的意识形态性及其应对策略[J]. 思想教育研究, 2023(2): 90-96.
[37]	《中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和二〇三五年远景目标的建议》辅导读本[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2020.
[38]	韩庆祥. 从资本逻辑走向人的逻辑[N]. 光明日报, 2017-09-18(15).
[39]	互联网信息服务算法推荐管理规定[EB/OL]. (2022-01-04) [2025-01-08]. https://www.cac.gov.cn/2022-01/04/c_1642894606364259.htm.
[40]	陈昌凤, 霍婕. 权力迁移与人本精神: 算法式新闻分发的技术伦理[J]. 新闻与写作, 2018(1): 63-66. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2295.2018.01.011
[41]	温德尔·瓦拉赫, 科林·艾伦. 道德机器: 如何让机器人明辨是非[M]. 王小红, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2017.
[42]	习近平. 习近平谈治国理政: 第2卷[M]. 北京: 外文出版社, 2017.
[43]	吴大娟. 数字技术、精神政治与权力治理的辩证法——韩炳哲数字精神政治思想管窥[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 40(2): 16-23. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023050036