A Comparative Study of World University Rankings and Its Enlightenment to the Construction of “Double First-Class”

ZHANG Yi

doi:10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022010041

Volume 38 Issue 2

Mar. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2022 > 38(2): 138-145

ZHANG Yi. A Comparative Study of World University Rankings and Its Enlightenment to the Construction of “Double First-Class”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(2): 138-145. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022010041

Citation:

ZHANG Yi. A Comparative Study of World University Rankings and Its Enlightenment to the Construction of “Double First-Class”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(2): 138-145. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022010041

Citation:

PDF( 842 KB)

A Comparative Study of World University Rankings and Its Enlightenment to the Construction of “Double First-Class”

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022010041

ZHANG Yi

Office of the Party and Office of the President, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

Received Date: 2021-12-12
Available Online: 2022-04-06
Publish Date: 2022-04-25

Abstract

Abstract

At present, the four university rankings including THE, QS, USNEWS, and ARWU are the world university rankings with high recognition. They can reflect the quality of a university, and the setting of observation points has reference significance for the development of universities. This paper aims to condense the specific path to promote the high-quality development of higher education in the context of “breaking the five” through comparing the observation points of the four university rankings and summarizing the specific practices of Beijing University of Science and Technology. This paper provides a useful reference for accelerating the construction of “double first-class” universities and promoting the reform and development of higher education.
- higher education evaluation,
- double first-class construction,
- world university rankings

FullText(HTML)

References(16)

References

[1]	教育部. 统筹推进世界一流大学和一流学科建设总体方案[EB/OL]. (2015-10-24)[2021-10-25]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/moe_1777/moe_1778/201511/t20151105_2178 23.html.
[2]	周光礼. 大学评价必须超越指标[J]. 中国高教研究,2020(11):4-5.
[3]	张勇,张强,杜启振. 世界大学排名指标体系对比及其对中国“双一流”建设的启示[J]. 中国石油大学学报(社会科学版),2017,33(2):93-97.
[4]	张梦晨. 中国三所高校建设世界一流大学的战略对比研究[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,37(2):125-131.
[5]	管恩浩,胡文杰. 建设世界一流大学必由之路: 深研、厚积、广扬与传承[J]. 大学,2021(38):28-30.
[6]	王金龙,王叶静. 世界大学排名发展现状及其评价研究[J]. 上海教育评估研究,2017,6(3):19-25.
[7]	蔺艳娥,杨延冰,邓彤. 世界大学排名指标体系及对我国“双一流”建设的启示[J]. 陕西广播电视大学学报,2020,22(4):23-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-4649.2020.04.006
[8]	潘静. “双一流”建设的内涵与行动框架[J]. 江苏高教,2016(5):24-27.
[9]	王建华. “双一流”建设的要义[J]. 高等教育管理,2020(2):14-19.
[10]	陈廷柱,姜川. 阿特巴赫教授谈中国建设高等教育强国[J]. 大学教育科学,2009(2):5-8.
[11]	钟秉林,王新凤. 我国“双一流”建设成效评价的若干思考[J]. 高校教育管理,2020,14(4):1-6.
[12]	刘坤轮. 四个大学排行榜评价指标体系刍议[J]. 高教发展与评估,2021,37(5):63-66,124. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1672-8742.2021.05.008
[13]	夏国萍,管恩浩. 建设世界一流大学亟待处理好四重关系−基于三大世界大学排行榜的视角[J]. 高校教育管理,2018,12(4):27-35.
[14]	教育部. 中共中央国务院印发《深化新时代教育评价改革总体方案》[EB/OL]. (2020-10-13)[2021-10-25]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/moe_1777/moe_1778/202010/t20201013_494381.html.
[15]	铁铮. 中国高等教育要加快培养大师步伐[J]. 中国高等教育,2021(12):1.
[16]	武贵龙. 以党的十九届五中全会精神为指引谱写高等教育高质量发展新篇章[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,37(1):1-5.