Research on the Trial Committee in China

XIAO Jian-guo; XIAO Jian-guang

Volume 18 Issue 3

Jul. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2002 > 18(3): 60-66

XIAO Jian-guo, XIAO Jian-guang. Research on the Trial Committee in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(3): 60-66.

Citation:

XIAO Jian-guo, XIAO Jian-guang. Research on the Trial Committee in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(3): 60-66.

XIAO Jian-guo, XIAO Jian-guang. Research on the Trial Committee in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(3): 60-66.

Citation:

XIAO Jian-guo, XIAO Jian-guang. Research on the Trial Committee in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(3): 60-66.

PDF( 902 KB)

Research on the Trial Committee in China

XIAO Jian-guo¹,
XIAO Jian-guang²

1. School of Humanities and Social Sciences University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Graduate school Chinese University of Politics and Law, Beijing 100088, China

Received Date: 2002-01-10
Available Online: 2021-07-09

Abstract

Abstract

The system of the China-characterized Trial Committee in China result from two factors including history and politics. Its most malpractice is playing down judicial efficiency and blemishing justice and pricking up judicial corruption. It is out of date and necessary to be cancelled.
- the Trial Committee in China,
- trial organization,
- judicial dependence,
- judicial impartiality,
- judicial reform

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	XU Jing. From “Parental Power” to “Parental Responsibility”: Judicial Promotion of Family Education[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(2): 97-106. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024010067
[2]	SUN Shan. Judicial Application and Theoretical Review of Big Data Proof[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(1): 69-78. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024010112
[3]	ZHOU Jie, HU Kun. Contingent Logic and Practical Orientation of Flexible Criminal Justice Governance in the Age of Misdemeanors[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(3): 89-98. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023090120
[4]	LIU Zhao-ling, DUN Ning. The Application and Improvement of the Crime of Abusing the People in Custody or Tendance[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(1): 120-126. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022060108
[5]	HAN Xiao. The Rational Regression of Judicial Justice in the Administration of Wrongful Convictions[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(3): 320-329. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022080064
[6]	LIN Lin. Perfection of the Judicial Treatment System of Juvenile Delinquents[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(4): 446-454.
[7]	CHI Da-kui. The Trial Avoidance Effect of Guilty Plea[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(5): 84-90,97.
[8]	WANG Rui-jun, CHEN Yu-heng. Consummation and Remedy: Reflection on the Judicial Application of the Sentencing Suggestions of Guilty and Acceptance of Punishment[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(3): 78-88.
[9]	CHEN Xin-fan, WU Ming-yi. Analysis of Mixed Attributes of Land Use Right Transfer Contract and Its Application of Judicial Remedy: Thinking and Correction Based on Two-stage Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(4): 93-103.
[10]	CAO Dong-yuan. The Review and Further Thinking of the Third Supervisory Model in Japanese Corporate Law[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(1): 63-67.
[11]	SUN Jing-jing. The Saiban-in System and Its Impact on Criminal Justice in Japan[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(4): 97-101.
[12]	CHEN Cheng. Demonstration on Civil Incapacity of Persons in Custody: A Survey Based on Psychology, Legal System and Judicial Practice[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(2): 84-91.
[13]	CHANG Chuan-ling, SHEN Qiang. On the Judicialized Reform of Arrest Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(2): 52-56,82.
[14]	LIU Dong-gen. Restorative Justice and Its Implication to Our Country's Criminal Justice Practice[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(2): 60-65.
[15]	WEI Zeng-chan. Research on the Judicial Activism in WTO Dispute Settlement[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(3): 28-36.
[16]	LI Chao. Establishment of Judiciary Power in Modern China: Reconstruction of Power System and Transplantation of Institution[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(4): 19-23.
[17]	XIAO Jian-hua. The Construction of the System of Judicial Assistance between the Main Land and Taiwan[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(1): 10-16.