A Comparative Study of China and Germany News Climate Change Discourse from the Perspective of Ecolinguistics

LU Jiao-jiao

May 2021

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2018 > 34(6): 33-42

LU Jiao-jiao. A Comparative Study of China and Germany News Climate Change Discourse from the Perspective of Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 33-42.

Citation:

LU Jiao-jiao. A Comparative Study of China and Germany News Climate Change Discourse from the Perspective of Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 33-42.

Citation:

PDF( 1186 KB)

A Comparative Study of China and Germany News Climate Change Discourse from the Perspective of Ecolinguistics

LU Jiao-jiao

Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing 100089, China

Received Date: 2018-06-20
Available Online: 2021-05-22

Abstract

Abstract

Through a self-built Sino-German media climate change corpus and the corpus-driven linguistic discourse analysis(LDA),a comparative study of the media discourse of the two countries was conducted.The key topic distributions and the discourse dispute centers are meanwhile explored.The differential construction of climate change discourse and the ecological view reflected by the differences are also discussed,which can be seen as a beneficial exploration of environmental discourse under the perspective of ecological linguistics.
- Ecolinguistics,
- climate change discourse,
- linguistic discourse analysis,
- corpus-driven,
- Sino-German media

FullText(HTML)

References(31)

References

[1]	Alexander, R.& Stibbe A.From the analysis of ecological discourse to the ecological analysis of discourse[J].Language Sciences, 2014, (41):104-110,转引自黄国文,赵蕊华.生态话语分析的缘起、目标、原则与方法[J].现代外语, 2017, (5):585-596.
[2]	何伟,魏榕.话语分析范式与生态话语分析的理论[J].当代修辞学,2018,(5):63-73.
[3]	Neverla, I. & Schäfer, M.S.Das Medien-Klima[C].Wiesbaden,2012.
[4]	Schäfer, M.S.& Schlichting, I.Media representations of climate change:a meta-analysis of the research field[J].Environmental Communication, 2014, 8(2):142-160.
[5]	Eide, E., Kunelius, R. & Kumpu, V.Global Climate-Local Journalisms:A Transnational Study of How Media Make Sense of Climate Summits[C].Global Journalism Research Series, Vol.3, 2010.
[6]	蒋晓丽,雷力.中美环境新闻报道中的话语研究——以中美四家报纸“哥本哈根气候变化会议”的报道为例[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2010,31(4):197-200.
[7]	王寅.中日报纸气候变化报道新闻框架分析——以《人民日报》和《朝日新闻》为例[J].青年记者,2012,(11):8-9.
[8]	纪莉,刘偲.中国都市类报纸气候变化议题的报道框架与关注周期——以《南方都市报》为例[J].社会科学研究, 2013,(5):196-201.
[9]	郭小平.西方媒体对中国的环境形象建构——以《纽约时报》“气候变化”风险报道(2000-2009)为例[J].新闻与传播研究,2010, (4):18-30.
[10]	袁玥.全球性媒介事件的中西舆论互动与国家形象塑造——以“哥本哈根气候变化会议”为例[J].媒体时代, 2011, (10):52-55.
[11]	李晓丹,张增一.对中国报纸关于“气候门”事件的报道的话语分析[J].科学与社会,2017,7(1):95-107.
[12]	李璠.基于语料库的中美气候变化新闻报道的批评话语分析[J].新闻研究导刊,2017,(12):59-61.
[13]	李彬.福柯话语理论关照下的德语话语语言学的源起与发展[J].德语人文研究,2014,(2):16-22.
[14]	田海龙.批评话语分析:阐释、思考、应用[M].天津:南开大学出版社,2014.
[15]	Felder, E.Faktizitätsherstellung in Diskursen[C].Die Macht des Deklarativen.Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter,2013.
[16]	Felder,E.Pragma-semiotische Textarbeit und der hermeneutische Nutzen von Korpusanalysen für die linguistische Mediendiskursanalyse[A].In Felder, E., Müller, M. &Vogel, F.(eds.).Korpuspragmatik.Thematische Korpora als Basis diskurslinguistischer Analysen[C].Berlin/New York:de Gruyter, 2012:115-174.
[17]	Felder,E.Kognitive Muster der politischen Sprache.Eine linguistische Untersuchung zur Korrelation zwischen sprachlich gefasster Wirklichkeit und Denkmustern am Beispiel der Reden von Theodor Heussund Konrad Adenauer[M].Frankfurt a.M.:Peter Lang,1995.
[18]	IDS.Konnektor[OL].[2017-05-29].http://hypermedia.ids-mannheim.de/call/public/gramwb.ansicht?v_app=g&v_kat=Konnektor.
[19]	高志胜.现代汉语让步连词研究综述[J].安徽文学,2008,(9):339-343.
[20]	Thomas, A.Kultur und Kulturstandards[A].In Thomas,A., Kinast, E.& Schroll-Machl, S.(eds.).2005:Handbuch Interkulturelle Kommunikation und Kooperation[C].Band 1.Göttingen.2005:19-31.
[21]	Liang, Y. & Kammhuber, S.Ostasien:China[A].In Thomas, A., Kammhuber, S. & Schroll-Machl, S.(eds.).2007:Handbuch Interkulturelle Kommunikation und Kooperation[C].Band 2.Göttingen, 2007:171-185.
[22]	Köller, W.Perspektivität und Sprache:Zur Struktur von Objektivierungsformen in Bildern,im Denken und in der Sprache[M].Berlin:de Gruyter,2004.
[23]	Verursacherprinzip[OL].[2018-05-20].http://www.wissen.de/rechtschreibung/verursacherprinzip.
[24]	Verursacherprinzip[OL].[2018-05-10].https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verursacherprinzip.
[25]	世界人权宣言[OL].[2018-05-15].http://www.un.org/chinese/hr/issue/udhr.htm.
[26]	联合国千年宣言[OL].[2018-05-17].http://www.un.org/chinese/hr/issue/docs/7.PDF.
[27]	Stibbe,A.Ecolinguistics:Language,Ecology and the Stories We Live By[M].London and New York:Routledge,2015.
[28]	黄国文.论生态话语和行为分析的假定和原则[J].外语教学与研究,2017,(6):880-889.
[29]	何伟,魏榕.国际生态话语的内涵及研究路向[J].外语研究,2017,(5):18-24.
[30]	何伟,魏榕.生态语言学的超学科发展——阿伦·斯提布教授访谈录[J].外语研究,2018,(2):22-26.
[31]	黄国文,陈旸.生态哲学与话语的生态分析[J].外国语文, 2016,32(6):55-61.