Diachronic Development and Integrative Study on Chinese and Western Ecolinguistics

LI Qian

May 2021

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2018 > 34(6): 18-26

LI Qian. Diachronic Development and Integrative Study on Chinese and Western Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 18-26.

Citation:

LI Qian. Diachronic Development and Integrative Study on Chinese and Western Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 18-26.

LI Qian. Diachronic Development and Integrative Study on Chinese and Western Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 18-26.

Citation:

PDF( 482 KB)

Diachronic Development and Integrative Study on Chinese and Western Ecolinguistics

LI Qian

College of Foreign Studies, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China

Received Date: 2018-06-21
Available Online: 2021-05-22

Abstract

Abstract

Over the past forty years,ecolinguistics have made steady progress and preliminarily yielded various kinds of theoretical resources and important achievement,yet it still lacks systematic integration as an independent subject.This study will make an attempt to conduct a comprehensive integration study on the development of Chinese and Western ecolinguistics from the diachronic perspective.By dividing and systematizing important development phases,this study finds their limitations and drawbacks respectively.Meanwhile,it tries to seek for specific means and approaches to conduct an integrative study of Chinese and Western ecolinguistics.It also provides an extensive theoretical framework and a concrete practical reference,so as to realize communication in the field of ecolinguistics,and promote theoretical and methodologies constructions of China and Western countries,advancing integrated and diversified development of ecolinguistics.
- Ecolinguistics,
- historical review,
- integrative study

FullText(HTML)

References(59)

References

[1]	Haugen,E.The Ecology of Language[M].Standford:Standford University Press,1972.
[2]	Salzinger,K.Ecolinguistics:a radical behavior theory approach to language behavior[A].In Aaronson, D.&Reiber, R.W.(eds.).Psycholinguistics Research[C].Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum, 1979:109-130.
[3]	Bolinger, D.Language, The Loaded Weapon:The Use and Abuse of Language Today[M].Longman:London,1980.
[4]	Haiman,J.The iconicity of Grammar:isomorphism and motivation[J].Language, 1980,56(3):515-540.
[5]	Bang, J.C.& Døør, J.Language, Ecology, and Society:A Dialectical Approach[M].Continnum:London,2007.
[6]	Trampe, W.Language and ecological crisis[A].In Fill,A. & Mühlhäusler, P.(eds.).The Eolinguistics Reader[C].London and New York:Continuum,2002:232-240.
[7]	Alexander,R.Framing Discourse on the Environment:A Critical Discourse Approach [M].Routledge: New York,2009.
[8]	Finke,P.The ecology of science and its consequences for the ecology of language[J].Language Sciences, 2014,(41):71-82.
[9]	Harris,R.The Language Myth in Western Culture[M].Routledge:London,2001.
[10]	Garner,M.Language rules and language ecology[J].Language Sciences, 2014, (41):111-121.
[11]	Steffensen, S.V. & Fill, A.Ecolinguistics:the state of the art and future horizons[J].Language Sciences, 2014,(41):6-25.
[12]	Cowley,S.The cognitive dynamics of distributed language[J].Language Sciences, 2007, 29(5):575-583.
[13]	Fill, A.& Mühlhäusler, P.The Ecolinguistics Reader:Language,Ecology and Environment[M].Continuum:London and NewYork,2001.
[14]	Heuberger,R.Language and ideology:a brief survey of anthropocentrism and speciesism in English[A].In Fill,A. & Penz, H.(eds.).Sustaining Language[C].Münster:LIT Verlag, 2007:149-172.
[15]	Stibbe, A.& Zunino, F.Boyd's forest dragon or the survival of humanity:discourse and the social construction of biodiversity[A].In Döring, M.et al(eds.).Language,Signs and Nature:Ecolinguistic Dimensions of Environmental Discourse[C].Tübingen:Stauffenburg Verlag,2008:165-181.
[16]	Stamou, A.G.& Paraskevopoulos, S.Representing protection action in an ecotourism setting:a critical discourse analysis of visitors'books at a Greek reserve[J].Critical Discourse Studies, 2008, 5(1):35-54.
[17]	李国正.生态汉语学[M].长春:吉林教育出版社,1991.
[18]	艾尔文·菲尔,范俊军,宫齐.当代生态语言学的研究现状[J].国外社会科学, 2004, (6):5-10.
[19]	范俊军.生态语言学研究述评[J].外语教学与研究,2005, (2):110-115.
[20]	孔江平,王茂林等.语言生态研究的意义、现状及方法[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2016,38(6):1-28.
[21]	黄国文,陈旸.菲尔生态语言学研究述评[J].鄱阳湖学刊, 2016,(4):19-24.
[22]	斯蒂芬·考利,周文娟.求同存异、和谐共生的分布式语言观[J].鄱阳湖学刊,2017,(2):22-35.
[23]	黄国文.斯提比生态语言学研究述评[J].鄱阳湖学刊, 2018, (1):42-47.
[24]	何伟.生态语言学:发展历程与学科属性[J].国外社会科学,2018,(4):113-123.
[25]	何伟.关于生态语言学作为一门学科的几个重要问题[J].中国外语,2018,(4):1+11-17.
[26]	黄国文.从生态批语话语分析到和谐话语分析[J].中国外语,2018,(4):39-46.
[27]	梅德明.大数据时代语言生态研究[J].外语电化教学,2014,(1):3-10.
[28]	冯广艺.论语言态度的三种表现[J].语言研究,2013,(2):112-118.
[29]	肖自辉,范俊军.语言生态的监测与评估指标体系—生态语言学应用研究[J].语言科学,2011,10(3):270-280.
[30]	邹航.生物进化论视角下中国英语变体的研究[J].外语教学,2015,36(3):36-39.
[31]	杨勇,张泉.生态语言学视野下网络流行语的语言污染及治理探究[J].湖北社会科学,2015,(3):137-141.
[32]	戴桂玉,仇娟.语言、环境、社会——生态酒店英文简介之生态批评话语分析[J].外语与外语教学,2012,(1):48-52.
[33]	赵蕊华.系统功能视角下生态话语分析的多层面模式——以生态报告中的无须鳕身份构建为例[J].中国外语,2016,(5):84-91.
[34]	黄国文,陈旸.生态哲学与话语的生态分析[J].外国语文, 2016,(6):55-60.
[35]	赵蕊华,黄国文.生态语言学研究与和谐话语分析——黄国文教授访谈录[J].当代外语研究,2017,(4):585-596.
[36]	黄国文.外语教学与研究的生态化取向[J].中国外语,2016,(5):1,9-13.
[37]	黄国文.生态语言学研究与语言研究者的社会责任[J].暨南学报,2016, (6):10-14.
[38]	何伟,张瑞杰.生态话语分析模式构建[J].中国外语,2017, (5):56-64.
[39]	何伟,魏榕.话语分析范式与生态话语分析的理论基础[J].当代修辞学,2018,(5):63-73.
[40]	何伟,魏榕.多元和谐,交互共生——国际生态话语分析之生态哲学观建构[J].外语学刊,2018,(6):35-42.
[41]	何伟,魏榕.国际生态话语之及物性分析模式构建[J].现代外语,2017,(5):597-607.
[42]	何伟,魏榕.国际生态话语的内涵及研究路向[J].外语研究,2017,(5):18-24.
[43]	Zhou, W.& Huang,G.Chinese ecological discourse:a Confucian-Daoist inquiry[J].Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 2017,(4):1-18.
[44]	Zhou,W.Ecolinguistics:Towards a new harmony[J].Language Sciences, 2017, (62):124-138.
[45]	赵奎英.生态语言学与当代生态文学、文化研究的语言理论基础建构[J].文艺理论研究,2014,34(4):182-190.
[46]	谷志忠.ESP教学环境生态化研究[J].外语电化教学,2012, (6):47-51.
[47]	马瑞娟.课堂教学冲突研究[J].教学与管理,2013,(21):12-14.
[48]	邹晓燕,陈坚林.基于两种需求的大学英语生态化课程构建研究[J].外语教学,2016,37(3):51-55.
[49]	Döring, M.& Zunino, F.Nature Cultures in old and new worlds.Step towards an ecolinguistic perspective on framing a ‘new’ continent[J].Language Sciences, 2014,(41):34-40.
[50]	Nash, J.& Mühlhäusler, P.Linking language and the environment:the case of Norf'k and Norfolk Island[J].Language Sciences, 2014,(41):26-33.
[51]	Cowley,S.Bio-ecology and language:a necessary unity[J].Language Sciences, 2014, (41):60-70.
[52]	Sherris,A.Re-envisioning the Ghanaian ecolinguistic landscape:local illustration and literacy[J].Intercultural Education, 2013, 24(4):348-354.
[53]	Premsrirat,S.Endangered languages of Thailand[J].International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2007,(186):75-93.
[54]	朱长河.认知生态语言学——体验哲学视野下的语言研究新范式[J].外国语文,2015,31(5):59-64.
[55]	Van,L.Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning[M].Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers,2004.
[56]	胡庚申.生态翻译学解读[J].中国翻译,2008,(6):11-15.
[57]	胡庚申.生态翻译学:产生的背景与发展的基础[J].外语研究, 2010(4):62-67.
[58]	胡庚申.生态翻译学的研究焦点与理论视角[J].中国翻译, 2011(2):5-9.
[59]	胡庚申.生态翻译学:译学研究的“跨科际整合”[J].上海翻译,2009(02):3-7.