Analysis of Transitivity System in Chinese Possessor-Possessed Object Clause: From the Perspective of Systemic Functional Grammar

LUO Zai-bing

Volume 29 Issue 3

Jun. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2013 > 29(3): 41-45

LUO Zai-bing. Analysis of Transitivity System in Chinese Possessor-Possessed Object Clause: From the Perspective of Systemic Functional Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(3): 41-45.

Citation:

LUO Zai-bing. Analysis of Transitivity System in Chinese Possessor-Possessed Object Clause: From the Perspective of Systemic Functional Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(3): 41-45.

Citation:

PDF( 736 KB)

Analysis of Transitivity System in Chinese Possessor-Possessed Object Clause: From the Perspective of Systemic Functional Grammar

LUO Zai-bing

Chengdu Institute Sichuan Internationall Studies University, Chengdu 610000, China

Received Date: 2013-01-19
Available Online: 2021-06-24

Abstract

Abstract

In terms of Systemic Functional Grammar this paper is intended to explore the properties of transtivity system in Chinese Possessor-Possessed Objective Clause as well as its possessive meanings.It is concluded through detailed analysis that Chinese Possessor-Possessed Objective Clause is defined by the semantic relations between the starting NP and ending NP whose semantic functions are scattered between possessive meaning and existential meaning, and are construed into a cline in the transitivity system.
- possessor-possessed objective clause,
- possessive meaning,
- transitivity system,
- cline

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	WANG Jinjun, LIU Jingfang. The Construction of China’s National Image in News Reports on Poverty Alleviation in China Daily (2012—2022): A Transitivity-based Analysis[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(3): 61-69. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022110041
[2]	ZHOU Jin-you. A Contrastive Study of Disciplinary Knowledge-building from the Perspective of Multimodality[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 685-694. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022100079
[3]	YANG Cai-ying, ZHONG Ting. The Transitivity Approach to the Ecological Care in The Call of The Wild[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(3): 28-32,40.
[4]	ZHOU Wen-juan. Analytical Methods,Assumptions,Goals and Principles of English Transitivity: Taking “The earthquake destroyed the city” as an Example[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(5): 9-16.
[5]	HE Wei, LIU Jia-huan. A Contrastive Study of the Logico-semantic Relations and Their Representations between English and Chinese Clauses[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(2): 1-17.
[6]	XIONG Xue-liang. Vertical Extension Analysis of GIVE Di-transitive Construction[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(5): 6-11,18.
[7]	HE Wei, WEI Rong. Review of Transitivity Studies within Systemic Functional Linguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(1): 1-20.
[8]	YI Xiu-qing. Transitivity and the Theme of Pursuit: Morrison's Song of Solomon[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(1): 50-55.
[9]	MIAO Xing-wei, LIU Li-hua. A Cognitive Semantic Study of Transitive Phrasal Verbs with Up[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(3): 20-25.
[10]	WANG Gen-lian. An Interpretation of the Syntactics and Semantics of “Fact” Projection[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(3): 10-16.
[11]	XIA Hong. English Dynamic Modality for Logical Argumentation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(4): 50-53.
[12]	SI Xian-zhu, LI Bing-jie. The Application of the Transitivity Theory in Translation Criticism——Exemplified by the Contrastive Study on the Two Versions of Translation of A Small Incident(Event)[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(2): 1-6.
[13]	CHEN Ying. The Function of Functional Discourse Analysis to the Ability of English Reading——Analyzing One News Discourse from the Perspective of Transitivity[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(2): 31-36.
[14]	SU Hang, LIU Cheng-yu. A Comparative Study of Transitivity between Sydney Grammar and Cardiff Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(1): 41-47.
[15]	SU Hang, LIU Cheng-yu. Analyzing English Verbally Expressed Jokes in the Framework of Transitivity[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(1): 28-32.
[16]	JIN Na-na. Process Concord and Process Sequence——A Cohesion Phenomenon beyond Words[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(4): 27-31.
[17]	FUSAITE Luo-bin. A Semantic System Network for MOOD in English[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(2): 83-98.
[18]	Written by Robin P. FAWCETT. A Semantic System Network for MOOD in English[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 89-100.
[19]	HE Wei, MA Rui-zhi. Overview of the Transitivity System within the Cardiff Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(1): 98-105,119.
[20]	JIANG Wang-qi. Martin's Discourse Semantics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(4): 95-104.