Time Study on Public Policy Making—Based on S City’s “Car Control” Policy Analysis

DU Qin-nan

Jun. 2021

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2018 > 34(3): 92-99

DU Qin-nan. Time Study on Public Policy Making—Based on S City’s “Car Control” Policy Analysis[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(3): 92-99.

Citation:

DU Qin-nan. Time Study on Public Policy Making—Based on S City’s “Car Control” Policy Analysis[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(3): 92-99.

Citation:

PDF( 402 KB)

Time Study on Public Policy Making—Based on S City’s “Car Control” Policy Analysis

DU Qin-nan

School of Law and Politic, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China

Received Date: 2018-04-14
Available Online: 2021-06-01

Abstract

Abstract

Time is a common and important element in policy making. Exploring the meaning of time and the conditions and influence of decision makers’ grasping of time elements can help understanding policy making deeply .The existing researches are mainly based on Western countries or EU, not on China. Decision-makers’ time-related policy actions have become the main proposition for people to question “Car Control” policy. This essay analyzes S city’s “Car Control” policy making process on the perspective of time strategies, and finds out: the government takes time strategy to balance the conflict between policy responsiveness and accountability. The choice of time strategy depends on the incentives from government credibility and policy effectiveness. Once time is ignored or misused, it may lead a certain policy to performance or legitimacy difficulties. Public policy and public management should take time seriously.
- time,
- policy making,
- time strategies,
- control on car

FullText(HTML)

References(15)

References

[1]	周晓中. 公共政策的“时间”问题[J]. 中共中央党校学报,2012,16(2):70-74.
[2]	堵琴囡,唐贤兴. 找回时间:一项新的公共政策研究议程[J]. 公共行政评论,2016,9(2):155-181.
[3]	Meyer-Sahling & Jan-Hinrik. Time and European Governance: An Inventory[C]. Canada:The Biennial Conference of the European Studies Association, 2007.
[4]	Schmitter, P. & Santiso, J. Three temporal dimensions of the consolidation of democracy[J]. International Political Science Review, 1998, 19(1):69-92.
[5]	Pollitt, C.Time, Policy and Management[M].New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
[6]	唐贤兴,堵琴囡. 时间中的公共政策制定:一个概念化的分析框架[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2015, 57(6):138-148.
[7]	[美]詹姆斯·E·安德森.公共政策制定[M]. 谢明译,北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2009.
[8]	[美]H·乔治·弗雷德里克森.新公共行政[M]. 丁煌, 方兴译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011.
[9]	Goetz, K.H. A question of time: responsive and responsible democratic politics[J].West European Politics, 2014, 37(2):379-399.
[10]	Goetz, K.H. How does the EU Tick? Five propositions on political time[J].Journal of European Public Policy, 2009, 16(2):202-220.
[11]	[美]约翰.W.金登. 议程、备选方案与公共政策[M].丁煌,方兴译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004.
[12]	Cole, A. A strange affair: the 2002 presidential and parliamentary elections in France[J].Government and Opposition, 2002, 37(3):317-342.
[13]	Koehler, G. Time, complex systems and public policy: a theoretical foundation for adaptive policy making[J].Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology and Life Sciences, 2003, 7 (1):99-114.
[14]	Mittenzwei, K. Bullock, D.S. & Salhofer, K. Towards a theory of policy timing[J].Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2012, 56(4):583-596.
[15]	陈晓枫,余超.论中国式汽车限购的合法化治理[J]. 江苏行政学院学报,2015, 83(5):113-119.