Evolution and Theoretical Interpretation: Usage Notes in the Different Editions of <i>Oxford Advanced Learner's English-Chinese Dictionary</i>

LÜ Jing

Volume 35 Issue 5

May 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2019 > 35(5): 38-45

LÜ Jing. Evolution and Theoretical Interpretation: Usage Notes in the Different Editions of Oxford Advanced Learner's English-Chinese Dictionary[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(5): 38-45.

Citation:

LÜ Jing. Evolution and Theoretical Interpretation: Usage Notes in the Different Editions of Oxford Advanced Learner's English-Chinese Dictionary[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(5): 38-45.

Citation:

PDF( 544 KB)

Evolution and Theoretical Interpretation: Usage Notes in the Different Editions of Oxford Advanced Learner's English-Chinese Dictionary

LÜ Jing

School of Foreign Studies, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China

Received Date: 2019-06-09
Available Online: 2021-05-24

Abstract

Abstract

Since its fourth edition,the Oxford Advanced Learner's English-Chinese Dictionary(OALECD) has set up a column of Usage Note,which categorizes the words according to their paradigmatic relations for the convenience of comparison or differentiation,and for the purpose of explaining their usage.With several revisions in different editions,the categorization of the usage notes has underlied many changes.This paper is intended to sample all the Usage Note colomns from editions 4,6,7 and 8 to trace the trend of the changes and to attempt theoretical intepretations of it.
- Oxford Advanced Learner's English-Chinese Dictionary,
- Usage Notes,
- paradigmatic relation,
- lexical category

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	ZHANG Yubo, YANG Bingjun, DONG Baohua. Towards the Lexical Realization and the Grammatical System of the Finiteness in the Chinese Clause: A Functional Typological Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(4): 63-74. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023090096
[2]	WANG Yafeng, YU Guodong. Category Construction and Orientation in Parent/Child Interaction[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(3): 267-276. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022110092
[3]	CHEN Ming-fang, CAO Jun-feng. Lexico-grammatical Realization of Ecosophy in the Nature Poem of What Mystery Pervades a Well[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(3): 239-246.
[4]	WU Guo-xiang. Lexical Density and Its Fluctuation: A Study on Multiple English Translations of the Analects of Confucius[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(5): 25-32,42.
[5]	HE Wei, LIU Jia-huan. A Contrastive Study of the Logico-semantic Relations and Their Representations between English and Chinese Clauses[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(2): 1-17.
[6]	CHEN Yu-juan, LIU Yu-jie. Appraisers and Attitude Categories in Novels[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(5): 20-27.
[7]	GUO Fang, CHEN Xiu-ying. An Insight into Language Transfer in Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition Based on Language Game[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 33(4): 26-31.
[8]	CHEN Yong. Try to Discuss the Dynamic Changes of Semantics under the Category of Language——Take Number-Categories in Chinese and English for Examples[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(3): 17-22,26.
[9]	YANG Xin-zhang. Text-image Relations in Learner's English-Chinese Dictionaries[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(4): 45-51.
[10]	JIN Na-na. Process Concord and Process Sequence——A Cohesion Phenomenon beyond Words[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(4): 27-31.
[11]	ZHANG Man. Differences in Using “I” and “We” in Book Reviews[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(2): 29-32.
[12]	LIN Wen-jie. The Reflection of Interpersonal Relationship by the Lexicogrammatical Structure of Dialogue[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(4): 20-26.
[13]	LI Jie-yuan. Personal Pronouns as Means of Relation-Building in Advertising Discourse: An English-Chinese Contrastive Analysis[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(2): 104-108.
[14]	YU Hui. Lexical Cohesion Patterns and Genre Analysis[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(2): 109-113.
[15]	ZHAO Zhi-yuan, LI Xue-mei, FU Lin. An Exploration of the Research Range of Chinese County Economy[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 23-28.
[16]	LI Rui, CONG Xiao-feng. A Historical Review of the Range of Social Law[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(2): 74-80.
[18]	GU Xian-lin. A Longitudinal Study of the Relationship between Government and University[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(3): 41-44.