Volume 34 Issue 5
Jun.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YANG Tian-qi. New Exegesis and Reconstruction: the Characteristics and Significance of Kang Youwei’s “Neo-confucian Classics”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(5): 64-72.
Citation: YANG Tian-qi. New Exegesis and Reconstruction: the Characteristics and Significance of Kang Youwei’s “Neo-confucian Classics”[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(5): 64-72.

New Exegesis and Reconstruction: the Characteristics and Significance of Kang Youwei’s “Neo-confucian Classics”

  • Received Date: 2018-05-17
    Available Online: 2021-06-01
  • Kang Youwei believed that western concepts of democracy, freedom, equality and fraternity had existed in China since ancient times. But Xun Xue’s clumsiness and Liu Xin’s pseudo-error failed to make it continue. Therefore, in his entire interpretation of Confucian classics, he tried to combine western democratic thoughts with Confucianism as much as possible, trying to introduce western political thought into the Confucian text. Kang Youwei’s practice of “transplanting flowers and connecting trees” has undoubtedly covered the western political theory with a layer of Confucianism. However, it must be cleared that Kang Youwei did not want to “westernize Confucianism”, but “Confucianism turns western learning”. Although this “Confucianism” interpretation has caused many far-fetched mistakes, it is not only helpful to release the researcher’s main spirit, but also encompass a wider world of meaning beyond the text.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    梁启超.论中国学术思想变迁之大势[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2001.
    [2]
    汪荣祖.康章合论[M].北京:新星出版社, 2006.
    [3]
    汤志钧.重论康有为与今古文问题[J].近代史研究,1984, (5):204-219.
    [4]
    吴雁南.心学、今文经学与康有为的变法维新[J].近代史研究,1989, (2):139-154.
    [5]
    黄开国.康有为“两考”与经学的终结[J].陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016,(3):90-93.
    [6]
    唐明贵.康有为的古经新解与经学的近代转型[J].孔子研究,2003,(6):97-106.
    [7]
    唐赤蓉,黄开国.康有为戊戌变法以后的新经学[J].哲学研究, 2015,(11):57-62.
    [8]
    陈壁生.晚清的经学革命[J].哲学动态,2017(12

    ).
    [9]
    翦伯赞.戊戌变法:第2册[M].中国史学会编.上海:上海人民出版社,2000.
    [10]
    [清]苏舆.苏舆集[M]. 胡如虹编.长沙:湖南人民出版社,2008.
    [11]
    刘学照.康有为的孔子观与今文经学的终结[J].江苏社会科学,2000,(2):126-132.
    [12]
    康有为.康有为全集:第1集 [M].姜义华,张荣华编校.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.
    [13]
    杨佩昌.钱玄同:国学文稿[M].北京:中国画报出版社,2010.
    [14]
    汤志钧.戊戌变法史[M].上海:上海社科院出版社,2015.
    [15]
    梁启超.清代学术概论[M].北京:中华书局,2010.
    [16]
    康有为.康有为全集:第3集 [M].姜义华,张荣华编校.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.
    [17]
    孔祥吉.康有为变法奏议研究[M].辽宁教育出版社,1988.
    [18]
    [清]翁同龢.翁同龢日记:第7集 [M].翁万戈编,翁以钧校订.上海:中西书局,2012.
    [19]
    萧公权.康有为思想研究[M].北京:新星出版社,2005.
    [20]
    康有为.康有为全集:第2集 [M].姜义华,张荣华编校.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.
    [21]
    康有为.康有为全集:第5集 [M].姜义华,张荣华编校.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.
    [22]
    康有为.康有为全集:第11集 [M].姜义华,张荣华编校.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.
    [23]
    康有为.康有为全集:第6集 [M].姜义华,张荣华编校.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.
    [24]
    [清]皮锡瑞.经学历史[M].北京:中华书局,1959.
    [25]
    章太炎.国故论衡[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2003.
    [26]
    章学诚.文史通义校注[M].叶瑛校注.北京: 中华书局,1994 .
    [27]
    冯友兰.三松堂全集:第:3卷 [M].郑州:河南人民出版社,1989.
    [28]
    杨天奇.超越“经学”、“国学”的“古典学”新境[J].海南大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2017, (2):154-165.
    [29]
    [德]伽达默尔.真理与方法(修订本)[M].洪汉鼎译.北京:商务印书馆,2007.
    [30]
    [德]伽达默尔.哲学解释学[M].夏镇平,宋建平译.上海:上海译文出版社,2004.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (183) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return