The Tentative Analysis of “<i>YOU</i>”-comparative Sentence from the Perspective of Cardiff Grammar

ZHANG Jing-yuan; ZHANG Yi

Volume 28 Issue 1

Jun. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2012 > 28(1): 34-40

ZHANG Jing-yuan, ZHANG Yi. The Tentative Analysis of “YOU”-comparative Sentence from the Perspective of Cardiff Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(1): 34-40.

Citation:

ZHANG Jing-yuan, ZHANG Yi. The Tentative Analysis of “YOU”-comparative Sentence from the Perspective of Cardiff Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(1): 34-40.

Citation:

PDF( 1041 KB)

The Tentative Analysis of “YOU”-comparative Sentence from the Perspective of Cardiff Grammar

School of Foreign Studies, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

Received Date: 2011-10-26
Available Online: 2021-06-24

Abstract

Abstract

This paper discusses YOU-comparative sentences within the framework of the Cardiff Grammar.The research results indicate that YOU-comparative sentences express not only the process of comparison under the label of event-relating process, but also the meaning of participant role and circumstantial role at the semantic level.At the syntactic level, YOU under discussion is a preposition, but not a verb.
- YOU-comparative Sentence,
- semantic,
- syntax,
- word class

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	YAN Shiqing. On the Philosophical Implications of the Semogenesis Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(2): 70-77. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023020064
[2]	ZHOU Wen-juan. On the Semantic and Grammatical Interpretations of Story, Discourse and Narrative[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(3): 272-280. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2021120095
[3]	FU Yi-qin, ZHAO Jia-dong. The Pragmatic Functions and Syntactic Features of Suo(所)-construction in Modern Chinese[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36(5): 1-8.
[4]	WANG Gen-lian. An Exploratory Analysis on the Semantic Character of Projecting Verbal Group Complex[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(4): 9-15.
[5]	HE Wei, LIU Jia-huan. A Contrastive Study of the Logico-semantic Relations and Their Representations between English and Chinese Clauses[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(2): 1-17.
[6]	LIU Yan. Study of Readability ofAlice's Adventures in Wonderland and Its Eight Adaptations: A Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspective of Reference[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(3): 20-29.
[7]	YI Yong. A Systemic Functional Syntactic Analysis of the “N+to+V”Construction in English[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(1): 44-49.
[8]	LI Zhan-zi. A Functional Syntactic Approach to Cultural Stereotypes[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2016, 32(4): 1-6.
[9]	WANG Gen-lian. An Interpretation of the Syntactics and Semantics of “Fact” Projection[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(3): 10-16.
[10]	DENG Ren-hua, LIANG Su-lian. The Syntactico-semantic Analysis of English Existential Clauses in the Sydney Grammar and the Cardiff Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(3): 1-9.
[11]	CHEN Yong. Try to Discuss the Dynamic Changes of Semantics under the Category of Language——Take Number-Categories in Chinese and English for Examples[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(3): 17-22,26.
[12]	XIA Hong. English Dynamic Modality for Logical Argumentation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(4): 50-53.
[13]	HE Wei, YAN Zhen-hua. Exploration of Discontinuity in Verbal Group from a Systemic Functional Approach[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(1): 25-33.
[14]	HUANG Guo-wen. “Paraphrase” as a Strategy in Translating Lun Yu(The Analects) into English: A Functional Linguistics Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(3): 16-21.
[15]	HUANG Guo-wen. A Systemic Functional Syntactic Analysis of the “V+to+V” Construction in English[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(1): 8-13.
[16]	FUSAITE Luo-bin. A Semantic System Network for MOOD in English[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(2): 83-98.
[17]	Written by Robin P. FAWCETT. A Semantic System Network for MOOD in English[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 89-100.
[18]	JIANG Wang-qi. Martin's Discourse Semantics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(4): 95-104.
[19]	HE Wei, PENG Yi. Extensions of the Cardiff Grammar over the Sydney Grammar[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 108-116.
[20]	HE Heng-xing, XU Li-juan. Syntax of Pictures: A Survey of the Semantic Construal of Material Process[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(4): 105-108.