Volume 37 Issue 2
May  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG Rui-jun, ZHAI Yu-hang. On the Normative Interpretation and Application of Sentencing Suggestions:Taking 91 Normative Documents as Analysis Samples[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(2): 167-176.
Citation: WANG Rui-jun, ZHAI Yu-hang. On the Normative Interpretation and Application of Sentencing Suggestions:Taking 91 Normative Documents as Analysis Samples[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(2): 167-176.

On the Normative Interpretation and Application of Sentencing Suggestions:Taking 91 Normative Documents as Analysis Samples

  • Received Date: 2020-12-08
    Available Online: 2021-05-19
  • The sentencing suggestion is an expression form of the procuratorial organ's right to ask for punishment. The sentencing suggestions can be divided into the sentencing suggestions in the case of pleading guilty and the sentencing suggestions in the case of not pleading guilty. “Lenient system of confession and punishment” and “judicial reform of standardized sentencing” are the key factors to realize the “qualitative leap” in the value and orientation of sentencing suggestions. Since the criminal procedure law has established the leniency system of pleading guilty and punishment, in the cases of applying the leniency procedure of pleading guilty and punishment, the sentencing suggestions show the characteristics of the compulsory proposal, accurate content and the principle that the court should adopt. It is a test of the procuratorial professional ability and the theoretical foundation of penalty discretion for prosecutors to put forward sentencing suggestions and achieve accuracy. The standard application of sentencing recommendations, first of all, from the perspective of macro value, the procuratorial organs need to carry out the concept of lenient judicial reform of confession and punishment from the perspective of the basic principles of penalty discretion, clarify the different value positions of sentencing suggestions in cases of confession and non-confession of punishment;Secondly, at the top-level design level, we need to further supplement and improve the current system of normative legal documents involving sentencing suggestions. Finally, on the level of judicial practice, we need the procuratorial organs to fully communicate and negotiate with other subjects of criminal proceedings, play the auxiliary role of the artificial intelligence judicial system, and improve the supporting mechanism of lenient sentencing suggestions.

     

  • loading
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (395) PDF downloads(12) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return