Marxism as Reflected in the Hallidayan Approach to Ecolinguistics

LIU Yan; YU Hui

May 2021

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2018 > 34(6): 10-17

LIU Yan, YU Hui. Marxism as Reflected in the Hallidayan Approach to Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 10-17.

Citation:

LIU Yan, YU Hui. Marxism as Reflected in the Hallidayan Approach to Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 10-17.

LIU Yan, YU Hui. Marxism as Reflected in the Hallidayan Approach to Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 10-17.

Citation:

LIU Yan, YU Hui. Marxism as Reflected in the Hallidayan Approach to Ecolinguistics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(6): 10-17.

PDF( 541 KB)

Marxism as Reflected in the Hallidayan Approach to Ecolinguistics

LIU Yan^1,2,
YU Hui¹

1. School of Foreign Languages and Literature, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
2. Beijing Electronic Science and Technology Institute, Beijing 100070, China

Received Date: 2018-01-17
Available Online: 2021-05-22

Abstract

Abstract

Ecolinguistics addresses the relationship between language and ecology.Two major approaches have been identified,i.e.Haugenian Approach and Hallidayan Approach.The present study aims to uncover the inheritance and development of Marxist views on language and ecology by the Hallidayan Approach.Among the views are the social nature of language,the relationship between language, matter and consciousness, and linguistic constructivism.Influenced by the “two reconciliations”of Marxist views on ecology,the Hallidayan Approach is also critical of capitalism,which is by nature anti-ecological.The task of a Hallidayan ecolinguist is therefore to uncover“how our ways of meaning affect the impact we have on the environment”.
- ecolinguistics,
- Hallidayan Approach,
- Marxist views on language,
- Marxist views on ecology

FullText(HTML)

References(42)

References

[1]	黄国文.生态语言学的兴起与发展[J].中国外语,2016,13(1):1+9 -12.
[2]	Fill, A.Ecolinguistics:states of the art 1998[A].In Fill,A. & Mühlhǖāusler, P.(eds.).The Ecolinguistics Reader:Language,Ecology and Environment[C].London:Continuum, 2001:43-53.
[3]	黄国文.从系统功能语言学到生态语言学[J].外语教学,2017,38(5):1-7.
[4]	严世清.论韩礼德的语言哲学思想[J].外语研究,2002,(2):7-19.
[5]	常晨光.系统功能语言学理论与实践的辩证关系——适用语言学探索[J].外语与外语教学,2010,(5):11-14.
[6]	何远秀.韩礼德新马克思主义语言研究取向[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2016.
[7]	乔瑞金.生态文明是可能的“马克思主义与生态文明”国际学术会议综述[J].马克思主义与现实,2007,(6):51-58.
[8]	董强.马克思主义生态观研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2015.
[9]	《马克思主义基本原理概论》编写组编.马克思主义基本原理概论[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2015.
[10]	李忠尚.第三条道路——“新马克思主义”与中国崛起之真谛[M].北京:人民出版社,2010.
[11]	Halliday,M.A.K.The influence of Marxism[A].In Webster, J.J.(ed.).The Bloomsbury Companion to M.A.K.Halliday[C].London:Bloomsbury, 2015:94-100.
[12]	Martin,J.Interviews with M.A.K.Halliday:Language Turned Back on Himself[C].London and New York:Bloomsbury,2013.
[13]	Martin,J.R.Grammar meets genre:reflections on the Sydney School[J].Arts:The Journal of the Sydney University Arts Association, 2000, (22):47-95.
[14]	Webster,J.J.Towards a Marxist Linguistics[R].Guangzhou:School of Foreign Languages,Sun Yat-sen University,2011.
[15]	Halliday,M.A.K.Language as Social Semiotic:The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning[M].London:Arnold,1978.
[16]	于晖.语篇体裁结构潜势及其应用[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2001,(1):6-10.
[17]	Halliday,M.A.K.Is the grammar neutral?Is the grammarian neutral?[A].In Webster, J.J.(ed.).On Language and Linguistics(Vol.3 in The Collected Worksof M.A.K.Halliday)[C].London:Continuum/Beijing:Peking University Press, 2003/2007:271-292.
[18]	张冰.马克思主义与语言哲学,是马克思主义的吗?[J].中国人民大学学报,2013,(6):123-129.
[19]	马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集(第1卷)[C].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[20]	马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯文集(第9卷)[C].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[21]	Halliday, M.A.K.& Matthiessen, C.M.I.M.Construing Experience through Meaning:A Language-based Approach to Cognition [M]. London and New York:Continuum,1999.
[22]	何远秀,杨炳钧.韩礼德的马克思主义语言哲学观与方法论[J].东南学术,2014,(5):20-25.
[23]	朱永生,严世清.系统功能语言学再思考[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2011.
[24]	Halliday,M.A.K.The evolution of a language of science[A].In Webster, J.J.(ed.).Aspects of Language and Learning[C].Berlin /Heidelberg:Springer-Verlag,2016:17-34.
[25]	Halliday,M.A.K.On the grammar of pain[J].Functions of Language, 1998, 5(1):1-32.
[26]	(美)赫伯特·马尔库塞.单向度的人[M].刘继译.上海:上海译文出版社,1989.
[27]	张秀琴.弗洛伊德式阐释与实践唯物主义阐释——马尔库塞与马克思意识形态理论之比较[J].学术界,2005,(6):166-171.
[28]	Lemke, J.L.Discourse, dynamics,and social change[J].Cultural Dynamics, 1993, 6(1):243-275.
[29]	Halliday,M.A.K.On grammar and grammatics[A].In Hasan, R., Cloran, C.& Butt, D.G.(eds.).Functional Descriptions:Theory and Practice[C].Amsterdam:Benjamins, 1996:1-38.Reprinted in Webster, J.J.(ed.).On Grammar(Vol.1 in The Collected Works of M.A.K.Halliday)[M].London:Continuum/Beijing:Peking University Press, 2002/2007:384-417.
[30]	辛志英.语法学研究的生态系统范式[J].中国外语,2014,11(1):15-21.
[31]	Halliday,M.A.K.New ways of meaning:the challenge to applied linguistics[J].Journal of Applied Linguistics,1990, (6):7-16.
[32]	辛志英,黄国文.系统功能语言学与生态话语分析[J].外语教学,2013,34(3):7-10 +31.
[33]	Halliday,M.A.K.Applied linguistics as an evolving theme[A].In Webster, J.(ed.).Language and Education:Collected Works of M.A.K.Halliday[C].London:Continuum, 2007:1-19.
[34]	乔瑞金.英国的新马克思主义[M].北京:人民出版社,2013.
[35]	马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集(第42卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1979.
[36]	王学俭,宫长瑞.马克思、恩格斯“两个和解”思想及其当代价值[J].探索,2010,(1):154-157.
[37]	吴巨培.马克思的双重生态忧患及其现实启示——以马克思的异化劳动思想为线索[J].求索,2013,(8):107-109.
[38]	王雨辰.反对资本主义的生态学——评西方生态学马克思主义对资本主义社会的生态批判[J].国外社会科学,2008,(1):4-12.
[39]	于晖.伯恩斯坦知识结构理论的系统功能语言学解读[J].中国外语,2012,9(6):43-50.
[40]	黄国文.生态话语分析的缘起、目标、原则和方法[J].现代外语,2017,(5):585-595.
[41]	何伟,魏榕.话语分析范式与生态话语分析的理论基础[J].当代修辞学,2018,(5):63-73.
[42]	何伟,张瑞杰.生态话语分析模式构建[J].中国外语,2017,14(5):56-64.