New study on the Object of Criminal Procedure

WANG Meng-fei

Volume 20 Issue 3

Jul. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2004 > 20(3): 48-51

WANG Meng-fei. New study on the Object of Criminal Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(3): 48-51.

Citation:

WANG Meng-fei. New study on the Object of Criminal Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(3): 48-51.

WANG Meng-fei. New study on the Object of Criminal Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(3): 48-51.

Citation:

WANG Meng-fei. New study on the Object of Criminal Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(3): 48-51.

PDF( 350 KB)

New study on the Object of Criminal Procedure

WANG Meng-fei

Law School An hui University, Hefei 230039, China

Received Date: 2004-03-20
Available Online: 2021-07-06

Abstract

Abstract

Present main viewpoints about the content of the object of criminal procedure in China are open to discussion.By analyzing the definition and original word meaning of the object of criminal procedure and using the theories of litigation aim,litigation construction and litigation act to study the object of criminal procedure,we can find the object of criminal procedure is substantive and procedural facts which have legal meaning and substantive and procedural laws which should be applied.The object of criminal procedure has several characteristics.
- object of criminal procedure,
- fact and law,
- characteristic of object of criminal procedure

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	LIU Jinlin. Exploring the Personal Information Protection from the Perspective of Prosecutorial Public Interest Litigation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(3): 99-108. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023090022
[2]	ZHOU Jie, HU Kun. Contingent Logic and Practical Orientation of Flexible Criminal Justice Governance in the Age of Misdemeanors[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(3): 89-98. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023090120
[3]	HAN Xiao. The Rational Regression of Judicial Justice in the Administration of Wrongful Convictions[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 39(3): 320-329. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022080064
[4]	ZHAO Wei-zhong, WEI Yue-ning. On the Legal Dogmatics of the Coherence of Evidence between Supervision Law and Criminal Procedure Law[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(6): 706-713. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050017
[5]	LIAO Li-huan. The Normative Structure of Preventive Environmental Public Interest Litigation: Taking Article 1 of “The Interpretation of Several Issues on the Application of Law to Civil Public Interest Litigation Cases” as the Center[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(1): 66-73.
[6]	WANG Gen-lian. An Interpretation of the Syntactics and Semantics of “Fact” Projection[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 30(3): 10-16.
[7]	WU Ru-qiao. Division and Cooperation: Relationship between the Subject and Object in Civil Evidence-collecting Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 77-84,89.
[8]	SUN Jing-jing. The Saiban-in System and Its Impact on Criminal Justice in Japan[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(4): 97-101.
[9]	KE Yang-you, KONG Chun-chao. On the Attacking and Defending Methods in Civil Action——From the Perspective of Japanese Ordinary Civil Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 52-59,70.
[10]	XIAO Jian-guo, HUANG Zhong-shun. Research on Problems in the Application of Discretional Undertaking[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(1): 54-62.
[11]	ZHAO Wei. Study on the Principle of Direct and Verbal Trial and Criminal Witnesses to Testify in Court[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(3): 80-85.
[12]	KE Yang-you. On The Theory of Issue Preclusion Validity in Civil Litigation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(3): 59-64.
[13]	XIAO Jian-guo, XIE Jun. Research on the Distribution of Burden of Proof to Limitation of Action[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(1): 55-61.
[14]	LIU Dong-gen. Restorative Justice and Its Implication to Our Country's Criminal Justice Practice[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(2): 60-65.
[15]	KE Yang-you, WU Ying-qi. Research on the Litigant's Truthfulness Obligation in the Civil Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(3): 26-32.
[16]	JIN Yong-jun. Are E-bank Related Business Methods Patent Object?[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(2): 48-53.
[17]	WANG Chao. What Is Witness: Rethinking And Remolding——Based on Criminal Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(3): 71-78.
[18]	XIAO Jian-hua. Analysis of Subjectivity on Process of Judicial Provement[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 53-60.
[19]	PENG Bo. The Relationship between the Defend Attorney and Client in Criminal Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 68-75.