Research on the Litigant's Truthfulness Obligation in the Civil Procedure

KE Yang-you; WU Ying-qi

Volume 21 Issue 3

Jun. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2005 > 21(3): 26-32

KE Yang-you, WU Ying-qi. Research on the Litigant's Truthfulness Obligation in the Civil Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(3): 26-32.

Citation:

KE Yang-you, WU Ying-qi. Research on the Litigant's Truthfulness Obligation in the Civil Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(3): 26-32.

Citation:

PDF( 300 KB)

Research on the Litigant's Truthfulness Obligation in the Civil Procedure

College of Politics and Law Hebei University, Baoding 071002, China

Received Date: 2005-04-19
Available Online: 2021-06-30

Abstract

Abstract

Forming the Obligation of truthfulness in the civil procedure is in order to meet the need of complexity and change of lawsuit.As a filter for the court to propeny interefere the litigant's behavior,Obligation of truthfulness can promote the lawsuit action operating according to the intention of lawmakers; moreover it can help to form a system environment,in which,the judges can distinguish the truthfulness of the lawsuit material,which is a foundation of judgement.
- civil procedure,
- litigant,
- obligation of truthfulness

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	SUN Chenxi. The Nature Orientation and Enlightenment of Primary-face Proof[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(1): 51-60. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023120018
[2]	LIAO Li-huan. The Normative Structure of Preventive Environmental Public Interest Litigation: Taking Article 1 of “The Interpretation of Several Issues on the Application of Law to Civil Public Interest Litigation Cases” as the Center[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(1): 66-73.
[3]	HUANG Zhong-shun. On the Theoretical Source of the System of Alteration and Addition of the Person Subjected to Execution[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(2): 99-103,108.
[4]	WANG Yang. On the Collateral Obligation and the Safety Guarantee Obligation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(1): 132-135.
[5]	XIAO Jian-guo, CHEN Wen-tao. Study on Constructing Noncontentious Procedure of Realizing the Mortgage Right[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(1): 50-54,72.
[6]	WU Ru-qiao. Division and Cooperation: Relationship between the Subject and Object in Civil Evidence-collecting Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 77-84,89.
[7]	BAI Xiao-feng. Substantial and Procedural Issues on Protection of the Unborn[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(1): 70-74.
[8]	XIAO Jian-guo, HUANG Zhong-shun. Research on Problems in the Application of Discretional Undertaking[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(1): 54-62.
[9]	KE Yang-you, KONG Chun-chao. On the Attacking and Defending Methods in Civil Action——From the Perspective of Japanese Ordinary Civil Procedure[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(4): 52-59,70.
[10]	KE Yang-you. On The Theory of Issue Preclusion Validity in Civil Litigation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(3): 59-64.
[11]	LI Yu-xiang. The Thinking of Setting up Minimum Financial Guarantee System within Compulsory Education[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(1): 148-153.
[12]	XIAO Jian-guo. On the Nature and the Effect of Civil Enforcement[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(4): 11-18.
[13]	LIAO Yong-an, ZHAO Xiao-wei. The Comparative Study of Civil Expense of Proceeding System between Japan and China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(2): 41-47.
[14]	MA Liu-ying. On Amelioration of the System of Civil Witness in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 20(1): 87-90.
[15]	XIAO Jian-hua. The Construction of the System of Judicial Assistance between the Main Land and Taiwan[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(1): 10-16.
[16]	LIU Xue-zai. An Analysis of Puzzle of Res Judicata in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(3): 30-35.
[17]	MAO Ling. Research on the Civil jurisdiction system[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(4): 26-32.