Equalitarianism,Utilitarianism, and Fair Social Contract

GAO Dong-zhuo

Volume 26 Issue 3

Jun. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2010 > 26(3): 158-164

GAO Dong-zhuo. Equalitarianism,Utilitarianism, and Fair Social Contract[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 158-164.

Citation:

GAO Dong-zhuo. Equalitarianism,Utilitarianism, and Fair Social Contract[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 158-164.

GAO Dong-zhuo. Equalitarianism,Utilitarianism, and Fair Social Contract[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 158-164.

Citation:

GAO Dong-zhuo. Equalitarianism,Utilitarianism, and Fair Social Contract[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 26(3): 158-164.

PDF( 445 KB)

Equalitarianism,Utilitarianism, and Fair Social Contract

GAO Dong-zhuo

Freiburg University Germany, Freiburg 79098, Germany

Received Date: 2010-05-29
Available Online: 2021-06-26

Abstract

Abstract

This paper mainly focused on description of statements of fairness from Rawls & Hansanyi and Ken Binmore separately in this domain.By introducing concepts of "Game of Morals" and the like, a reconsideration, from the new perspective of Ken Binmore, is made about whether the "Egalitarianism" and "Utilitarianism" is always incompatible during the formation and the realization of the fair social contract.
- original position,
- Difference Principle,
- interpersonal comparison,
- empathetic preferences,
- evolution