DONG Wei-wei, LI Jing. Analysis on Ethical Compromise of Administrative Behavior——A Critical and Constructive Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(2): 150-155.
Citation: DONG Wei-wei, LI Jing. Analysis on Ethical Compromise of Administrative Behavior——A Critical and Constructive Perspective[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 28(2): 150-155.

Analysis on Ethical Compromise of Administrative Behavior——A Critical and Constructive Perspective

  • Received Date: 2011-10-12
    Available Online: 2021-06-24
  • Ethical compromise of administrative behavior is a temporary choice of the lower value behaviors in which the administrative subject who confronts the choice space of value is constrained by pressure.Its harm is mainly in the following four aspects: denying the administrator's virtue, destroying the normal organizational institution, creating a negative organizational culture, and lowering the legality of the public administration.The reasons of ethical compromise of administrative behavior include administrative ethical dilemma as objective realities, restrictions from superiors and organization, and the lack of ethical decision-making skills of administrators.To eliminate ethical compromise of administrative behavior, we should model the transcendence identities, establish the moralized institution, take the systematic and effective remedial measures, improve the ethical decision-making skills of administrators and build an ethical environment.

     

  • Relative Articles

    [1]NIU Lina, LU Chunxia, HOU Zhijiang. Ethical Undertones, Generative landscapes, and Ethical Traits of Xi Jinping’s Important Discourses on Scientific and Technological Innovation[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(6): 17-23. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024030161
    [2]FENG Ying, ZHANG Ming-lei. Analysis on the Functions of Administrative Legislative Hearing[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(6): 52-59,67.
    [3]LI Chun-yan. The Confucian Idea of Animal Protection in the Pre-Qin Period[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(4): 86-88.
    [4]PAN Jian-hong, LIU Jia-shun. Risk and Moral Principle of Genetically Modified Organism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(2): 164-168.
    [5]WANG Chang-zhu. The “Duty-kindness” Spirit and Construction of Modern Family Ethics[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 165-168.
    [6]HUO Zhen-yu. The Nature of Administrative Registration[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(4): 48-58,72.
    [7]DUAN Cheng-li. Analyzing Ethic Puzzlement of Political Compromise in Gender View[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(4): 154-158.
    [8]LI Xiao-guang. The Ethical Responsibility of Scientists[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(1): 151-156.
    [9]MO Guang-cai, WANG Wei-peng. The Evolution of Administrative Ecology to Ecological Administration: Insertion of Generational Fair Idea[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(4): 66-71.
    [10]MI Jing. On the Ethics of Teaching in University[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(1): 136-140.
    [11]WANG Shu-zhen, HUANG An-ming. Official Utility and Government Administrative Efficiency[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(4): 51-55.
    [12]LIU Wen-xia, YAN Feng, SONG Lin. Pondering on the Life Ethic[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(1): 9-13.
    [13]LI Wen-liang. Contract: the Basis of the Ethic Relationship in Public Administration in the West[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(4): 18-20.
    [14]LIU Wen-xia. Value of Nature and Ethics of Environment[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2002, 18(1): 65-69.
    [15]ZHANG Kang-zhi. The Moral Appeals in Administration Reform[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 17(2): 1-4,16.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-050510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 15.4 %FULLTEXT: 15.4 %META: 82.0 %META: 82.0 %PDF: 2.6 %PDF: 2.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 2.6 %其他: 2.6 %China: 0.2 %China: 0.2 %上海: 0.2 %上海: 0.2 %保定: 0.2 %保定: 0.2 %北京: 1.2 %北京: 1.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %天津: 0.4 %天津: 0.4 %常州: 0.2 %常州: 0.2 %张家口: 0.8 %张家口: 0.8 %扬州: 0.2 %扬州: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.2 %烟台: 0.2 %烟台: 0.2 %珠海: 0.8 %珠海: 0.8 %白城: 0.4 %白城: 0.4 %石家庄: 1.6 %石家庄: 1.6 %芒廷维尤: 11.5 %芒廷维尤: 11.5 %芝加哥: 0.2 %芝加哥: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.2 %襄阳: 0.2 %襄阳: 0.2 %西宁: 77.5 %西宁: 77.5 %西雅图: 0.2 %西雅图: 0.2 %郑州: 0.2 %郑州: 0.2 %长春: 0.4 %长春: 0.4 %其他China上海保定北京哥伦布天津常州张家口扬州洛阳烟台珠海白城石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥衡阳襄阳西宁西雅图郑州长春

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (404) PDF downloads(14) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return