Gift Relationship “Rebuilding”?——Debate on Social Relations Which Gift and Commodity Direct

ZHAO Shuang; YANG Bo

Jun. 2021

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2018 > 34(4): 88-94

ZHAO Shuang, YANG Bo. Gift Relationship “Rebuilding”?——Debate on Social Relations Which Gift and Commodity Direct[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(4): 88-94.

Citation:

ZHAO Shuang, YANG Bo. Gift Relationship “Rebuilding”?——Debate on Social Relations Which Gift and Commodity Direct[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(4): 88-94.

Citation:

PDF( 711 KB)

Gift Relationship “Rebuilding”?——Debate on Social Relations Which Gift and Commodity Direct

School of Public Administration and Humanities, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116023, China;Management Department, Liaoning Police College, Dalian 116036, China

Received Date: 2018-05-14
Available Online: 2021-06-01

Abstract

Abstract

Gift exchange is the main concern of sociologists to research social relations.As a kind of exchange system,gift exchange contributes to the formation of cohesion among groups and communities.In contrast,commodity exchange is considered to be a form of exchange that occurs in the market society,and easy to create individualized and atomized social relationships.This paper points out that sociologists advanced by reading the relevant literature:one view is that gift is a hidden commodity,in contrast,another view is that gifts and commodities point to completely different forms of social relations.By making in-depth analysis,this paper further points out that the rebuilding of gift relationship in modern society may be an unachievable task.
- gift,
- commodity,
- social relation

FullText(HTML)

References(25)

References

[1]	李秀辉.从货币到礼物:社会等级秩序的型构机制与优化策略[J].学术研究,2018,(3):67-74.
[2]	Simpson, B., Harrell, A.,et al.The roots of reciprocity:gratitude and reputation in generalized exchange systems[J].American Sociological Review,2018,83(1):88-110.
[3]	山口重克主编.市场经济:历史·思想·现在[M].张季风等译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2007.
[4]	Cheal,D.The Gift Economy[M].London:Routledge,2017.
[5]	Carrier, J.Gifts, commodities, and social relations:a maussian view of exchange[J].Socialogical Forum,1991,(6):119-136.
[6]	Belk, R.W.Gift-giving behavior[A].Parvatiyar, A. & Sheth,J.N.(ed.).Research in Marketing.New York:JAI Press Inc,1997:100-122.
[7]	Sanchez,A.Carrier, J.G.,et al.The Indian gift:a critical debate[J].History & Anthropology, 2017,(28):553-583.
[8]	阎云翔.礼物的流动:一个中国村庄中的互惠原则与社会网络[M].上海:上海人民出版社:2000.
[9]	Sahlins,M.D.Stone Age Economics[M].London:Routledge,2017.
[10]	Gouldner,A.W.The norm of reciprocity:a preliminary statement[J].American Sociologist Review, 1960,25(2):161-178.
[11]	Blau,P.M.Exchange and Power in Social Life[M].New York:John Wiley & Sons,1964.
[12]	汲喆.礼物交换作为宗教生活的基本形式[J].社会学研究,2009,(3):1-25.
[13]	Malinowski,B.Argonauts of the Western Pacific:An Account of Native Enterprise,and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea[M].London:Routledge & Kegan Paul,1984.
[14]	Leach,E.R.Political Systems of Highland Burma:A Study of Kachin Social Structure[M].London:Athlone Press,1954.
[15]	刘拥华.礼物交换:“崇高主题”还是“支配策略”?[J].社会学研究,2010,(1):157-176.
[16]	Mauss,M.The Gift:The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies[M].New York:Free Press,1954.
[17]	Gregory,C.A.A conceptual analysis of a non-capitalist gift economy with particular reference to Papua New Guinea[J].Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1981,5(2):119-135.
[18]	Strathern,M.Qualified value:the perspective of gift exchange[A].Humphrey, C. & Hugh-Jones, S.(eds.)Barter,Exchange and Value:An Anthropological Approach[C].New York:Cambridge University Press,1992.
[19]	Weiner,A.B.Inalienable Possessions:The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving[M].Berkeley:University of California Press,1992.
[20]	Lawler,E.J.An effect of social exchange[J].The American Journal of Sociology, 2001, 107(2):321-352.
[21]	李秀辉.货币与礼物:社会交往的两种逻辑——兼论货币的真实起源[J].社会科学战线,2015,(6):52-61.
[22]	[美]霍贝尔.原始人的法——法律的动态比较研究[M].严存生等译.北京:法律出版社,2006.
[23]	Befu,H.Social exchange[J].Annual Review of Anthropology, 1977,(6):255-281.
[24]	Johnson, C.L. & Johnson, F.A.Interaction rules and ethnicity:the Japanese and caucasians in Honolulu[J],Social Forces, 1975,54(2):452-466.
[25]	毛丹.村庄的大转型[J].浙江社会科学,2008,(10):2-13.