LI Jiancheng, WANG Luozhong. Policy Instrument Choice for Collaborative Governance of Air Pollution in “2+26” Cities[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(4): 76-86. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2025010039
Citation: LI Jiancheng, WANG Luozhong. Policy Instrument Choice for Collaborative Governance of Air Pollution in “2+26” Cities[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(4): 76-86. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2025010039

Policy Instrument Choice for Collaborative Governance of Air Pollution in “2+26” Cities-An Analysis Based on Grounded Theory

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2025010039
  • Received Date: 2025-01-09
  • Publish Date: 2025-05-23
  • Based on the grounded theory analysis of policy texts, this paper constructs a theoretical model of policy instrument for collaborative governance of air pollution in “2+26” cities, and clearly depicts the realistic picture of collaborative governance of air pollution in “2+26” cities from the perspective of policy instrument. The study found that the realization of the collaborative governance goals of air pollution in “2+26” cities depends on the comprehensive application of the goal-oriented guiding tools, the process-oriented executive tools, the result-oriented guarantee tools, and the capability-oriented enabling tools. There are differences in the degree of application of different types of policy instrument in the collaborative governance of air pollution in “2+26” cities. The four types of policy instrument dedicated to collaborative governance of air pollution in “2+26” cities are not separate and independent from each other, but an organic combination of continuous advancement and connection. They constitute the basic policy toolbox for collaborative governance of air pollution in “2+26” cities. Therefore, in order to realize the long-term operation of collaborative governance of air pollution, it is necessary to attach importance to the guiding role of guiding tools, continue to play the key role of executive and guarantee tools, pay attention to the capacity building of collaborative governance of regional air pollution, so as to continuously empower the collaborative governance of regional air pollution.

     

  • [1]
    孟庆国,魏娜. 结构限制、利益约束与政府间横向协同——京津冀跨界大气污染府际横向协同的个案追踪[J]. 河北学刊,2018,38(6):164-171.
    [2]
    赵新峰,袁宗威. 京津冀区域大气污染协同治理的困境及路径选择[J]. 城市发展研究,2019,26(5):94-101. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2019.05.021
    [3]
    刘华军,雷名雨. 中国雾霾污染区域协同治理困境及其破解思路[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(10):88-95.
    [4]
    戴亦欣,孙悦. 基于制度性集体行动框架的协同机制长效性研究——以京津冀大气污染联防联控机制为例[J]. 公共管理与政策评论,2020,9(4):15-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4026.2020.04.002
    [5]
    乔花云,司林波,彭建交,等. 京津冀生态环境协同治理模式研究——基于共生理论的视角[J]. 生态经济,2017(6):151-156.
    [6]
    ZHOU W & RUI M. Exploring coordinative mechanisms for environmental governance in Guangdong−Hong Kong−Macao greater bay area:An ecology of games framework [J/OL]. Sustainability (2019-06-03) [2024-10-10]. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/11/3119.
    [7]
    谢宝剑,陈瑞莲. 国家治理视野下的大气污染区域联动防治体系研究——以京津冀为例[J]. 中国行政管理,2014(9):6-10. doi: 10.3782/j.issn.1006-0863.2014.09.01
    [8]
    胡光旗,踪家峰,甘任嘉. 中央督察下的地方环境竞赛与区域协同治理模式[J]. 人文杂志,2022(2):50-60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0447-662X.2022.02.006
    [9]
    司林波,张锦超. 跨行政区生态环境协同治理的动力机制、治理模式与实践情境——基于国家生态治理重点区域典型案例的比较分析[J]. 青海社会科学,2021(4):46-59.
    [10]
    胡宗义,杨振寰. “联防联控”政策下空气污染治理的效应研究[J]. 工业技术经济,2019,38(7):129-135. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-910X.2019.07.016
    [11]
    WANG H,ZHAO L,XIE Y,et al. “APEC blue” — The effects and implications of joint pollution prevention and control program [J]. Science of the Total Environment,2016,553:429-438. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.122
    [12]
    赵志华,吴建南. 大气污染协同治理能促进污染物减排吗?——基于城市的三重差分研究[J]. 管理评论,2020,32(1):286-297.
    [13]
    柴发合,云雅如,王淑兰. 关于我国落实区域大气联防联控机制的深度思考[J]. 环境与可持续发展,2013,38(4):5-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-288X.2013.04.002
    [14]
    GUO S. Environmental options of local governments for regional air pollution joint control:Application of evolutionary game theory [J]. Economic and political studies,2016,4(3):238-257. doi: 10.1080/20954816.2016.1218691
    [15]
    TRELL E & VAN G. The governance of local urban climate adaptation:Towards participation,collaboration and shared responsibilities [J]. Planning Theory & Practice,2019,20(3):376-394.
    [16]
    WANG P,LIU D,MUKHERJEE A,et al. Air pollution governance in China and India:Comparison and implications [J]. Environmental Science & Policy,2023,142:112-120.
    [17]
    CHENG K & LÜ F. Environmental pollution status quo and legal system of third-party governance in Hebei Province,China [J]. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology,2019,18(1):89-96.
    [18]
    刘琳,吴云飞. 政治经济学语境下对资本主义生态治理的批判与扬弃[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2024,40(5):24-31.
    [19]
    王学栋,张定安. 我国区域协同治理的现实困局与实现途径[J]. 中国行政管理,2019(6):12-15.
    [20]
    李雪松,孙博文. 大气污染治理的经济属性及政策演进:一个分析框架[J]. 改革,2014(4):17-25.
    [21]
    李倩. 跨界环境治理目标责任制的运行逻辑与治理绩效——以京津冀大气治理为例[J]. 北京行政学院学报,2020(4):17-27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7621.2020.04.003
    [22]
    胡一凡. 京津冀大气污染协同治理困境与消解——关系网络、行动策略、治理结构[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2020,41(2):48-56.
    [23]
    赵新峰,袁宗威. 区域大气污染治理中的政策工具:我国的实践历程与优化选择[J]. 中国行政管理,2016(7):107-114. doi: 10.3782/j.issn.1006-0863.2016.07.16
    [24]
    王雁红. 政府协同治理大气污染政策工具的运用——基于长三角地区三省一市的政策文本分析[J]. 江汉论坛,2020(4):26-32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-854X.2020.04.004
    [25]
    吴芸,赵新峰. 京津冀区域大气污染治理政策工具变迁研究——基于2004—2017年政策文本数据[J]. 中国行政管理,2018(10):78-85.
    [26]
    郑石明,罗凯方. 大气污染治理效率与环境政策工具选择——基于29个省市的经验证据[J]. 中国软科学,2017(9):184-192. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2017.09.018
    [27]
    周付军,胡春艳. 大气污染治理的政策工具变迁研究——基于长三角地区2001—2018年政策文本的分析[J]. 江淮论坛,2019(6):134-141. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-862X.2019.06.021
    [28]
    王红梅,谢永乐. 基于政策工具视角的美英日大气污染治理模式比较与启示[J]. 中国行政管理,2019(10):142-148.
    [29]
    LI Z,YUAN X,XI J,et al. The objects,agents,and tools of Chinese co-governance on air pollution:A review [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2021,28(31):24972-24991.
    [30]
    熊烨. 我国地方政策转移中的政策“再建构”研究——基于江苏省一个地级市河长制转移的扎根理论分析[J]. 公共管理学报,2019,16(3):131-144.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHANG Xinpeng, LIU Li. Analysis on the Problem of “Instrumentalized Reason” from the Perspective of Historical Materialism[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(1): 111-119. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2023090062
    [2]WANG Zhuoshi, CHANG Xinyu, DENG Wang. Research on the Development Path of Comprehensive Services in Colleges and Universities from the Perspective of Grounded Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 40(5): 54-64. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024010051
    [3]AN Jing, ZHANG Ni. Policy Research on the Governance of Chaos in Fan Club[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 38(5): 510-516. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2022050063
    [5]WANG Li, SONG Hong-qing, SHAO Li-hua. Research on Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education in Colleges and Universities from the Perspective of Synergy Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 37(6): 638-644.
    [6]Jhony Choon Yeong Ng, XU Lu-xi, TAN Qing-mei. Multi-tasking Value Sphere of Chinese Youths: A Classical Grounded Theory Research on Multi-tasking Behavior and Logic[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(5): 46-56.
    [7]LI Hong, ZHOU Ke, ZHAO Zhi-yi. Research on the Formation of the Construction Policy of“New Engineering”Based on the Theory of Multiple-source Stream[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 35(2): 109-114.
    [8]ZHANG Li-wei, YANG Xiu. Urban Community Governance under the Theory of Inclusion and Democracy[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 34(2): 86-91.
    [9]GAO Ming, WU Xue-ping. Behavior Logic and Compensation of Air Pollution Control in Enterprises[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(6): 84-89.
    [10]ZHANG Xiao-ming. Theoretical Analysis of Public Policy Process: Western Reference and Local Resources[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 29(4): 95-104.
    [11]FENG Hu, ZHANG Xuan. Regional Differences in Internet Development in China and Policy Management[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 27(3): 150-157.
    [12]SHEN Min-rong. Law and Law Teleology——Teleology and Tool-oriented Theory in Modern Law[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 25(3): 61-69.
    [13]ZHAO Xiu-ling. Putting People First and Governance of the Chinese Government: Aanalysis on the Policy of Benefiting the People[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2008, 24(1): 40-46.
    [14]WAN Shao-he. On the Stability of the Rule of Law——the Premise Analysis of the Theories of the Rule of Law[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(3): 65-71.
    [15]HUAN Jian-li. State Policies, Peasants and the Rural Poverty in Contemporary China: A Perspective from Structurization Theory[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2007, 23(3): 6-12,25.
    [16]CAO Fu-guo. Shareholding Structure and Corporate Governance: Rethinking of the Theoretical Logic of the Two Corporate Governance Models[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 22(2): 63-72.
    [17]SONG Xiao-mei. Innovation of the Analysis Tools Used in the Studies of Human Capital——Origin and Meanings of System Analysis[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 21(2): 94-98.
    [18]XUN Jian-li. Assisting-the-poor Policy and Rural Poverty[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 19(1): 7-9.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-062025-07010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 31.4 %FULLTEXT: 31.4 %META: 65.7 %META: 65.7 %PDF: 2.9 %PDF: 2.9 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 9.5 %其他: 9.5 %Central District: 1.0 %Central District: 1.0 %Springfield: 2.9 %Springfield: 2.9 %上海: 1.0 %上海: 1.0 %保定: 1.0 %保定: 1.0 %包头: 2.9 %包头: 2.9 %北京: 3.8 %北京: 3.8 %十堰: 1.0 %十堰: 1.0 %南通: 2.9 %南通: 2.9 %大连: 1.0 %大连: 1.0 %天津: 2.9 %天津: 2.9 %宣城: 2.9 %宣城: 2.9 %常州: 1.0 %常州: 1.0 %张家口: 2.9 %张家口: 2.9 %扬州: 2.9 %扬州: 2.9 %新加坡: 1.0 %新加坡: 1.0 %景德镇: 1.0 %景德镇: 1.0 %朝阳: 1.9 %朝阳: 1.9 %杭州: 1.0 %杭州: 1.0 %淄博: 1.0 %淄博: 1.0 %淮安: 1.0 %淮安: 1.0 %清远: 1.0 %清远: 1.0 %温州: 3.8 %温州: 3.8 %漯河: 2.9 %漯河: 2.9 %潍坊: 1.0 %潍坊: 1.0 %益阳: 1.0 %益阳: 1.0 %石家庄: 8.6 %石家庄: 8.6 %福州: 1.0 %福州: 1.0 %芒廷维尤: 19.0 %芒廷维尤: 19.0 %芝加哥: 1.0 %芝加哥: 1.0 %西宁: 8.6 %西宁: 8.6 %邯郸: 2.9 %邯郸: 2.9 %重庆: 1.0 %重庆: 1.0 %长沙: 2.9 %长沙: 2.9 %其他Central DistrictSpringfield上海保定包头北京十堰南通大连天津宣城常州张家口扬州新加坡景德镇朝阳杭州淄博淮安清远温州漯河潍坊益阳石家庄福州芒廷维尤芝加哥西宁邯郸重庆长沙

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (69) PDF downloads(3) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return