Volume 41 Issue 5
Oct.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
XU Wen. Challenges and Responses: Approaches to Protecting Personal Rights and Interests of Heroes and Martyrs in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(5): 125-134. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024110009
Citation: XU Wen. Challenges and Responses: Approaches to Protecting Personal Rights and Interests of Heroes and Martyrs in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(5): 125-134. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024110009

Challenges and Responses: Approaches to Protecting Personal Rights and Interests of Heroes and Martyrs in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024110009
  • Received Date: 2024-11-03
  • Publish Date: 2025-10-25
  • The flexibility of generative artificial intelligence represented by ChatGPT in cross-modal creation and the possibility of deep forgery have produced challenges and impacts on the traditional protection mechanism of personal rights and interests of heroes and martyrs, which need to be handled. In terms of the protection concept, the socialist core values should be fundamentally followed, and the requirements of truthfulness and credibility, sensitive labeling, and clear rights and responsibilities should be implemented from the three aspects of data collection channels, data labeling rules, and technical service agreements. In terms of protection framework, the subject of rights and interests should be reasonably defined, based on the dimension of life, the purpose of attribution, and the indication of groups, and different legal provisions should be applied according to the dual feature of personal rights and interests of heroes and martyrs and the classification of different rights and interests. In terms of protection approaches, the scope of application should be defined according to the attributes of rights and interests, the responsibility standards should be defined according to the types of rights and interests, and the responsibility mode should be defined according to the responsible subjects.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    王钢. 刑法新增罪名的合宪性审查——以侵害英雄烈士名誉、荣誉罪为例[J]. 比较法研究,2021(4):83-97.
    [2]
    刘艳红. 法秩序统一原理下侵害英雄烈士名誉、荣誉罪的保护对象研究[J]. 法律科学,2021,39(5):110-123.
    [3]
    阮健. 论《民法总则》185条侵害英雄烈士等人格利益之规定[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版),2017,38(S2):61-63.
    [4]
    周光权. 法秩序统一性的含义与刑法体系解释——以侵害英雄烈士名誉、荣誉罪为例[J]. 华东政法大学学报,2022,25(2):6-19.
    [5]
    杨清望. 国家客观文化法益的法理分析及其法律保护——以英雄烈士权益保护为切入点[J]. 法制与社会发展,2022,28(4):41-56.
    [6]
    李冠煜,石晓南. 论侵害英雄烈士名誉、荣誉罪的保护法益[J]. 中南大学学报(社会科学版),2023,29(2):70-82.
    [7]
    刘颖. 《民法总则》中英雄烈士条款的解释论研究[J]. 法律科学,2018,36(2):100-113.
    [8]
    袁明扬,陈林林. 《民法典》“英烈条款”的司法适用及完善——基于52份英烈人格保护判决的分析[J]. 法律适用,2022(6):102-111.
    [9]
    王春梅. 英烈人格利益保护的请求权规范基础及其裁判路径[J]. 东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),2022(1):125-133.
    [10]
    黄点点. 论《民法总则》对英雄烈士等姓名、肖像、名誉、荣誉的保护[J]. 理论月刊,2017(8):111-117,147.
    [11]
    迟方旭. 《民法总则》第185条的核心要义是维护社会公共利益[J]. 红旗文稿,2017(11):30-32.
    [12]
    黄忠顺. 英烈权益诉讼中的诉讼实施权配置问题研究——兼论保护英雄烈士人格利益的路径选择[J]. 西南政法大学学报,2018,20(4):44-52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-4355.2018.04.05
    [13]
    郭峻维. “英雄烈士保护”民事公益诉讼制度的完善[J]. 社会科学战线,2023(2):267-274.
    [14]
    康天军. 英烈保护司法实务问题探析[J]. 法学论坛,2018,33(6):126-131.
    [15]
    段泽孝. 英烈精神保护中公法与私法的衔接[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版),2019,40(6):117-126.
    [16]
    方盛举,杨睿哲. 和合文化与中华民族共同体建设[J]. 理论与改革,2023(4):39-51.
    [17]
    范进学. 论我国宪法上的言论自由及其义务边界[J]. 西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,50(4):155-167.
    [18]
    王泽应,张小枝. 中国式现代化建设中爱国主义的价值追求、精神特质和天下情怀[J]. 湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023,50(4):1-8,176. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4799.2023.04.002
    [19]
    吴毅,汪洋. 外向发力:近代以来中国爱国主义的发展简论[J]. 开放时代,2023(3):144-163,9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2938.2023.03.010
    [20]
    冯秀军,王先亮. 新时代中国共产党关于爱国主义的理论创新[J]. 思想理论教育导刊,2023(5):94-101.
    [21]
    高泽晋. 潘多拉的魔盒:人工智能训练数据的来源、使用与治理——面向100位AI开发者的扎根研究[J]. 新闻记者,2022(1):86-96.
    [22]
    栗瑜. 人工智能时代数据标注众包劳动的法律保护[J]. 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2023,45(1):64-77.
    [23]
    姚志伟,李卓霖. 生成式人工智能内容风险的法律规制[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2023,43(5):147-160.
    [24]
    尹田. 论人格权独立成编的技术障碍[J]. 政法论丛,2016(1):53-58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6274.2016.01.007
    [25]
    张新宝. 《中华人民共和国民法总则》释义[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2017.
    [26]
    孙宗龙. 论《民法典》第185条的司法适用:条件、样态及论证理路[J]. 私法,2022,39(3):43-56.
    [27]
    王叶刚. 论侵害英雄烈士等人格权益的民事责任——以《民法总则》第185条为中心[J]. 中国人民大学学报,2017,31(4):31-37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5420.2017.04.004
    [28]
    张惠彬,侯仰瑶. 从技术到法律:AI换脸短视频的侵权风险与规范治理[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2024,40(1):124-132.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1616) PDF downloads(9) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return