Current Status and Recommendations of Talent Evaluation Mechanisms in Chinese Universities in the New Era

ZHU Baoshan; NI Yang; CHEN Xiaohong

doi:10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024080033

Volume 41 Issue 2

Feb. 2025

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition) > 2025 > 41(2): 27-35

ZHU Baoshan, NI Yang, CHEN Xiaohong. Current Status and Recommendations of Talent Evaluation Mechanisms in Chinese Universities in the New Era[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(2): 27-35. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024080033

Citation:

ZHU Baoshan, NI Yang, CHEN Xiaohong. Current Status and Recommendations of Talent Evaluation Mechanisms in Chinese Universities in the New Era[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing ( Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 41(2): 27-35. doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024080033

Citation:

PDF( 849 KB)

Current Status and Recommendations of Talent Evaluation Mechanisms in Chinese Universities in the New Era

doi: 10.19979/j.cnki.issn10082689.2024080033

1.
Personnel Division, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
2.
Office of the Party Committee & Office of the President, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
3.
School of Humanities and Social Science, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

Received Date: 2024-05-07
Publish Date: 2025-02-01

Abstract

Abstract

It is imperative to deepening the reform of talent systems and mechanisms, especially addressing the issue of talent evaluation mechanisms in universities. Based on a text review of literature research and participatory observation through field research, this paper focuses on analyzing the theoretical foundations and characteristics of talent evaluation mechanisms in universities, as well as the current state and specific measures of talent evaluation reform in Chinese universities. Grounded in theoretical and practical research, this paper proposes the principles of talent classification management and scientific research quality priority, highlights the trends of addressing practical issues through talent and the integration of industry-university-research collaboration, and emphasizes the enhancement and suggestions for the application of artificial intelligence in education and teaching in the context of the new era. Theoretically, it helps provide a comprehensive understanding of the internal logic and theoretical connotations of talent evaluation mechanisms, enriching the research framework. Practically, it contributes to optimize and improve the talent evaluation mechanisms in universities, providing decision-making reference and guidance for managers and policymakers.
- universities,
- talent evaluation mechanisms,
- current status,
- recommendations

FullText(HTML)

References(28)

References

[1]	张越,郭玥,余江. 通用人工智能驱动的科研新范式:理论与实践[J/OL]. 科学学研究,https://doi.org/10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20240829.001.
[2]	中国政府网. 中共中央印发《关于深化人才发展体制机制改革的意见》[EB/OL]. (2016-03-21)[2023-06-12]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2016-03/21/content_5056113.htm.
[3]	中共中央办公厅国务院办公厅印发《关于深化项目评审、人才评价、机构评估改革的意见》[EB/OL]. (2018-07-03) [2023-06-12]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/202203/content_3635312.htm.
[4]	人民网. 坚决克服“五唯”痼疾[EB/OL]. (2018-09-10)[2023-06-12]. http://theory.people.com.cn/GB/n1/2018/0919/c40531-30301877.html.
[5]	李杨. 科技治理范式下的人才评价:理论指向与实践进路[J]. 中国科技论坛,2024(1):93-104.
[6]	李永全,胡钦晓. 从“五唯”到“五维”:学术评价范式的转换[J]. 江苏高教,2023(1):25-34.
[7]	贺武华,娄莹莹. 高校“五唯”评价的形成机理与治理反思——以破“唯帽”评价为例[J]. 教育发展研究,2020(9):8-14.
[8]	周光礼. 破“五唯”立新标:建构中国特色哲学社会科学评价体系[J]. 中国人民大学学报,2022,36(3):15-18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5420.2022.03.004
[9]	刘苏雅. 我国科技人力资源总量超1.1亿人规模继续保持世界第一[EB/OL]. (2022-06-27)[2024-03-14]. https://tech.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202206/27/WS62b92958a3101c3ee7adcd03.html.
[10]	科技部:我国研发人员总量多年保持世界首位[EB/OL]. (2023-02-24)[2024-03-14]. https://www.chinanews.com.cn/cj/2023/02-24/9959795.shtml.
[11]	常乐融融. 研究生学术类微信公众号阅读行为研究[D]. 上海:华东师范大学,2022.
[12]	DILL D. The management of academic culture:Notes on the management of maning and social integration[J]. Higher Education,11:303-320.
[13]	金顶兵,闵维方. 研究型大学组织整合机制的案例研究[J]. 北京大学教育评论,2003(2):86-92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9468.2003.02.013
[14]	金顶兵,闵维方. 论大学组织的分化与整合[J]. 高等教育研究,2004,25(1):32-38.
[15]	周金毅,常桥,张剑. 行业特色高校师资队伍管理体制建设优势分析[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2022,38(3):312-318.
[16]	陈敏,王轶. 破“五唯”政策视角下的学术成果评价研究[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2021,27(4):60-70.
[17]	邱均平,任全娥. 国内外人文社会科学科研成果评价比较研究[J]. 国外社会科学,2007(3):58-66.
[18]	巫锐,陈洪捷. 质量何为:德国学术评价机制转型研究[J]. 中国高教研究,2021(1):83-88.
[19]	科技部. “十三五”国家科技人才发展规划[EB/OL]. (2017-04-21) [2024-03-28]. http://www.xiongan.gov.cn/2017-06/29/c_136835304.htm.
[20]	教育部. 关于正确认识和规范使用高校人才称号的若干意见[EB/OL]. (2020-12-08) [2024-03-30]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A04/s8132/202012/t20201216_505893.html.
[21]	刘颖. 构建多元化创新科技人才评价体系[J]. 中国行政管理,2019(5):90-95.
[22]	杜领军. 基于BSC理论的高校绩效评价体系优化构想[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2018,34(4):68-74.
[23]	杨河清,王静. 人才评价体系的哲学探索——对非公经济代表人士综合评价体系的探讨[J]. 首都经济贸易大学学报,2007(6):9-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2700.2007.06.002
[24]	李菲,胡金凤. 我国科技人才评价的现状与思考[J]. 中国医药科学,2020,10(20):237-240. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0616.2020.20.062
[25]	BRAUN V & CLARKE V. Using thematic analysis in psychology [J]. Qualitative Research in Psychology,2006,3(2):77-101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[26]	对外经济与贸易大学. 专职教师/科研人员岗位聘任与考核指导意见[EB/OL]. (2019-09-29) [2024-03-04]. https://xxgk.uibe.edu.cn/rssz/rszd2/77727.htm.
[27]	赵姝婧,高原. 清华大学发布《关于完善学术评价制度的若干意见》[N/OL]. 清华新闻网(2019-04-20) [2024-04-14]. https://www.tsinghua.edu.cn/info/1173/17623.htm.
[28]	张洋,黄楠,余厚强,等. 基于政策文本分析的我国科技人才评价导向研究[J]. 情报科学,2024,42(3):10-17.